Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Thanks for your quick reply, Arno. Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix thanks Hi Daniel, On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc First let me point out, I don't see much reasons to upload this package to Debian (not that I could anyway). It was orphaned and should rather be removed than uploaded. You even say yourself your primary purpose is to learn packaging [1], hence I'd suggest you to pick a package you really care for instead. Of course. I did not know packages could be left aside for that reason; thanks for pointing that out The package you picked has a low popcon [2] no reverse dependencies and seems generally not helpful at all. That said, if you really want to maintain this package that's up to you. Here is a review: * You modified the orig.tar.gz tarball somehow: $ md5sum deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz afc838ca6174ac98d67b1580832e24d4 deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz 68893c38485b8063cdd6fbe81da76e11 mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz That's not acceptable, especially since the tarball was already uploaded to Debian archives. Thus, you are not allowed to change the tarball anymore, once it was uploaded without pushing a new upstream version. Hmm, I don't know what happened there. I don't recall modifying orig.tar.gz. Feel free to remove the wontfix tag once you addressed the tarball issue. Everything else is of lower importance. Since I won't adopt this package, should I re-orphan it and close this bug? Or is there something else I should do? * debian/compat 6 is somewhat outdated these days. Joey released debehelper 9 just recently. Note, using compat 6 is not a tragedy, but you would profit from using compat 7 or higher a lot. * The synopsis line of the package is not really helpful (yet another whatever does not help anyone) and does not match our guidelines [3]. * You use the old copyright format, consider upgrading to DEP-5 instead (that's optional of course). * Why do you install manpages manually in debian/rules? You should use dh_installman instead. This makes both, the install rule and the dirs file unneeded. * You should use the short dh form. Check [5] and dh(1) for examples. Most people consider the old-style debhelper form deprecated. While you are it, remove the source and diff targets. They are obsolete since ages it appears. * The package breaks the hardening release goal [6]. See [7] to learn how to apply hardening flags. * Since you upgraded to 3.0/quilt there is no point to add manpages as a patch anymore. Just put the file into debian/ and install it as I outlined above. * patches/xeji_c.patch misses an appropriate DEP-3 header (that's optional again) * Don't override I: and W: tags in Lintian. Moreover, note your explanation for overriding copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl is wrong. That's not what the tag is about. * Remove the README.Debian file. The URL is dead and its information is redundant to debian/copyright. Thanks for the feedback. Apart from the switch to quilt, all the comments above refer to stuff that the old maintainer did without much documentation. [1] bugs.debian.org/592977 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xeji [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis [4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny [6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags [7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html [8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK0SpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQKMP/jktuMN/RzQDF2YfoKnCzbLx VXb9mB9jx1fdFTpqAXu6ANpnTeaa1gvBhoMrpqxVWGakgqFT2ctbp3l9xHmTEKhB /SftLz+/AyDPREt99p3Mv1GXbWeo7tWLrIr++vnW95fm62g2VNxR0qpjzyejvK6S agE/oOiQU2R1OoSj10GhMREZOWCU77DkVOd99XJjC77/4N7BLOC0xk+SKKtsz+9d 2ARsS+VfypBnvtF6rphvoHiV4r8gZOrSJ3KvWo5VNJ+S+d3YLlZIgRx4anoqe1dx 3inUhWPTxDO45tGNP7f5vwbWwDBykqjCsAKM/Vl5HVcJf+pOQ9IHxcSiBXFfq1Zs HDd7YfrtogZB570OINvoMBgOtVIFf5scpsyI2/F5VqVA7NtUZaIWWpbr3Tb6qzWD V1n3HuXmnv3CpW/DKrMt/psK1QR2PvqH2R5x6fE4xggTgKG+VdRXMmVJKO7vvPlT /XEpWvNCA7uWhb3x8oXM2X0FHe5b9Na6ISZbyWprzPVRdUAD1JoPHjeAC16xG6Et k77bCT9fp2GaWzs3IYq8nzwiK56q5307ouAXZwNrj7/EgQbhFTrJufE/nWnNnrrF 4F/PXAHBbt82WTaskRaabD8RbqWVt4IyJeHTav4qJvulb057dzeHYp4bN9RHPZJH 0ezb6XBuHhAhK7DBgtqT =6oHw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/38a9b975-cfd1-4e16-9ef7-0c634560e...@email.android.com
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, On 03.02.2012 09:08, Daniel Martí wrote: Since I won't adopt this package, should I re-orphan it and close this bug? Or is there something else I should do? Orphan it again. Regarding this bug you can either close it or we reassign to ftpmaster and ask them for a package removal. Thanks for the feedback. Apart from the switch to quilt, all the comments above refer to stuff that the old maintainer did without much documentation. Yes, I understood. However, times change as do packaging styles and available technologies. This package wasn't touched for years. It is your job to bring a package in shape if you want to take it over. :) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK7yuAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQaIP/j522KKSHBK2x8bhQmwakUFO p9Ylr9YXk2fmHZ2Wag5FU7OLYXjHIsCvwzdtsWUaGgWqErdgO8wNcn+mm+UVes1L iCQEOGyfvGZRYb6pmkGg1b1ZzmsP/zLarshj2+7zvhBQfPIMDQfOuCROhsJZK9UV RNBvEzUO0xnCPC7XyPsK4EtPTSfH5A+o2//w4xEN6LH7D3uojfNRAj4UuxBYF4Rg sHXpRmGoyCYnvP7/tS3lVCVmUsEGyQSZgPuTeWfwOhC2g3k0ydEYnwhJW/zHYW/A kp0Hwn/E00pGK1z/cLknQkHC10jCa/EbrNryFhX405hoWiZHpjPjDK4CucLcXKWS KVr5McMBZsDmzxXbrvvPicPZbnKQswVMFhwPGNcUh9uAgbfN/wsvnavTUcAW+4RJ KzyeISli9XBP0uWuOOeVeBmGfJSCzt9TYz8PYoCkc2pKMDtty58q47AWZFJhPs6A 8/wPx/YcSDeC+KiNPOTpkumVjjv/W1ebJI3cxOZjJpEFNmTc/5f4vLNnvyRgMD3J B6tYPbgVKvc4VDurNkMoHDNhTe6CyOWMA/uALkQDnX1qlMG+ZQ1sWlAKcn6VDC0L f8LefxEu3YP744IUHEviBVkFgkhzDjmHhZMaNfTqGnCl3d6GGLir7BsD+5D1EFnh IcrEtV5sCgEy1JHWKxEe =6Hd6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2bbcae.9040...@toell.net
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Orphan it again. Regarding this bug you can either close it or we reassign to ftpmaster and ask them for a package removal. Orphaning again, OK. And as far as this bug, I'll leave it up to you :-) Yes, I understood. However, times change as do packaging styles and available technologies. This package wasn't touched for years. It is your job to bring a package in shape if you want to take it over. :) Agreed. I didn't mean I wouldn't solve those issues, the fact is that since support for this package will be dropped, there's no need in talking about them :-) Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85c2dafc-4510-4719-9501-113fd24a6...@email.android.com
Re: Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03.02.2012 12:36, Daniel Martí wrote: Agreed. I didn't mean I wouldn't solve those issues, the fact is that since support for this package will be dropped, there's no need in talking about them :-) I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it. *I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK8gCAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtK+4P/jh/tjp8rOeJ0HHqU1YIMUNv FvtNYf1MvBniRjh5pFp3QPpQCVkC+tCRZDnhzC4uVmVZN1aqaObnLksnInzcvdFv P1R4Qri6hgxE1CBe+VYL5ZGbFPv/764sddyIh6wYaCZsxJwsoyMIGsFdW5emR5hC gyHA24f4Z8o26QafR4YUoeUINLmG1BDdoiiWINER/VSj6Qh38om3VnFoYMo9b/yL BQenPArrgkVuVLDpBPdWvF1VRY8gQWqUYzHBfeJMmgMTW+J7EBOUnVwS9goHULHe a/W6zummRgVBa29Z3yP49PpdQFF+9xynlSaa0jzTPrj1wU4Jjra2Gp7ycuocF9jO z/0UDtzP/lPISkanYark30R+muU9oShPcGl5K2ovaP7Te2M30xzvuQSKJecOEMFq KI2nsx599bWXUV+hMo9+M2ssmbGjcxPwG7omlXxpiibRoHlzC0Gjg4OMG04qMAka ayUXjFXsLYWqvfoRelWrZzsxsLe+SbCCy48dT1A6OP2PNn6Xq1BQ4YokFujyjy+7 J6ip/1wKP5OZU9yk76QWrFzUikpe3h68pa1pknV/l8lCCNFjVSHs3TEW9Or7hPfA zNnzhxfsPAQkq3QFEXRcXVti99e0+8YttTsMKcYojMQheu+unGolAUFi7/sKnSpN 3WtlkVTe9311RXCALEs1 =kX6+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2bc802.6010...@toell.net
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03.02.2012 12:36, Daniel Martí wrote: Agreed. I didn't mean I wouldn't solve those issues, the fact is that since support for this package will be dropped, there's no need in talking about them :-) I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it. *I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough. + mind note: Write to the bug, not to the list. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK8hgAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt5sIP/A97KPuZL7/UVLHFZxzTrNy8 whIxFciDQCUDVC2zIhvo/G5wGbMTXEu4VBGcQiljn0rg/P/PhtlLuh2aFdswyqrC 1ULaKfRsEXxgmz2DbuwUi2/ZIkffHS4HFs84om3BnIKp/fFbzLFBU8iz7hAzyOh8 V3iSfy74jMwMFtnclfyHOUc1Wk8Pe9S3oQH0U7mWiNeyHYydhmGcq4J+6Pvw/hO4 O21E91Vz5ZRz41SJ2IKJ0OQotbHF6TuDawClv/LzOM7Nvu0EyAu8KmMpKMWxzqC3 AwF0jFmd+soAnolwk+dF13kMJ/IwgNFpPMorgpPVakFHeMCgNyCIRrtdXA992ol5 z6pBVseGoByM33Ze4EBjGpTGSxvqNsI7cwSNYLtlEVv6o+NRdFxu2evV8E3jZq17 xjgBaQOXe0JsmdQ6407WMeYwsa6muJyKkx3X/oNbz5QECMEHMF5d4njotT6D/8Nf RL82XPiQid0ExzI/6fsYhVjcZRLhRELzB8QrgxA0WTiQ5ti5AhEil4yEv3Mi5EIZ HAsEy+lRGnriTCzwkQuq+N31wHIzIaDoOjY9TVZ1tIM4V2SLgz1p2giVAk0DdjXA ViKfBfiyY+F46NugswegAATpCZNUgV12hqbPsmCdy4w/QQN1ukNUU10GvNsVqEUQ l2j/Ury4lF0tAjch/S2E =cHhl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2bc860.8060...@toell.net
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it. *I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough. Oh, don't take me wrong - You pointed it out, I didn't feel in any way obliged to follow your suggestion. I just think you're right; the package has been abandoned upstream for years now. Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ed5303f5-73fd-4489-adc3-61e0f647a...@email.android.com
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 658432 ftp.debian.org retitle 658432 RM: xeji -- RoQA; unmaintained, low popcon thanks On 03.02.2012 13:34, Daniel Martí wrote: Oh, don't take me wrong - You pointed it out, I didn't feel in any way obliged to follow your suggestion. I just think you're right; the package has been abandoned upstream for years now. I'll request a removal then. Dear ftpmasters please refer to reasons outlined in for a longer explanation in my review why I think the package should be removed. * Low popcon * Orphaned (#592977) * no reverse dependencies * dead upstream * let's put it that way: limited usefulness - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK/ADAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtmUoP/3kN2WxmZxchnT9bIef69qXU Nskdot8Q42wF+xaWrgSvTGckpIxG1n3+Fa4Yw2SQXoxzDpTiIPja+8Mlrf8+WBJR efOka52V1sHsb2ukq24z6b3DUnK063Iz0VEtAgysg3sZsuspIeLwuzaAMnTBEsAm c2zZU2QNP8qbBlspMamOpdUdQF+pJ4tKQgl7UrYmzcf6HcVFHkDJ6iw36efGuhLn I7ru6VW9R2ru6RY14hxvST9Lg+QRe2gwpP9u04YZz78ceD/cCAa8BFqnls4LygMm 0VwDCkZgm0ORPAbVC/YgylFd3I3DuiAmaUCXEqOTNjaKynyv5R27fL871hWkd7ok L/PKpp4ttkqjcoseiX1frZNFiOxHgk+pcn5VqAiGYWRTzDjIe3IE12bfKOuiW2mg 8NQvbjuYa4p65Pl2Oi7fiSXnVNJEs9Y6FdObJOe7vSoz5eJ6yLus7amdkqNzrLkD zDBqi8lY8+UPTht0ydLlxG+ZzmKgsTYwFWogDCGxOLV4kgPJEtSyfxRbF+uEdrMk i8a5numt6JZOfrigdiC/3G96PiITgYxaA0k7NmLq5tyukrqJca/y/8v106a5F8E7 KNLHkWdDlEd0Jj1mp9POjDzhmmK+1ZjdcTYHXGYpte91DxSpzk54B8YVKMHBzIZl zMbWnbbNYzHbeRFryrHg =utis -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2bf003.30...@toell.net
Processed: Re: Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 658432 ftp.debian.org Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Bug reassigned from package 'sponsorship-requests' to 'ftp.debian.org'. retitle 658432 RM: xeji -- RoQA; unmaintained, low popcon Bug #658432 [ftp.debian.org] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Changed Bug title to 'RM: xeji -- RoQA; unmaintained, low popcon' from 'RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132827956015798.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
package: sponsorship-requests severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xeji. * Package name: xeji Version : 1.2-15 * URL : (No upstream available; abandoned) * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xeji - Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xeji Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix thanks Hi Daniel, On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc First let me point out, I don't see much reasons to upload this package to Debian (not that I could anyway). It was orphaned and should rather be removed than uploaded. You even say yourself your primary purpose is to learn packaging [1], hence I'd suggest you to pick a package you really care for instead. The package you picked has a low popcon [2] no reverse dependencies and seems generally not helpful at all. That said, if you really want to maintain this package that's up to you. Here is a review: * You modified the orig.tar.gz tarball somehow: $ md5sum deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz afc838ca6174ac98d67b1580832e24d4 deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz 68893c38485b8063cdd6fbe81da76e11 mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz That's not acceptable, especially since the tarball was already uploaded to Debian archives. Thus, you are not allowed to change the tarball anymore, once it was uploaded without pushing a new upstream version. Feel free to remove the wontfix tag once you addressed the tarball issue. Everything else is of lower importance. * debian/compat 6 is somewhat outdated these days. Joey released debehelper 9 just recently. Note, using compat 6 is not a tragedy, but you would profit from using compat 7 or higher a lot. * The synopsis line of the package is not really helpful (yet another whatever does not help anyone) and does not match our guidelines [3]. * You use the old copyright format, consider upgrading to DEP-5 instead (that's optional of course). * Why do you install manpages manually in debian/rules? You should use dh_installman instead. This makes both, the install rule and the dirs file unneeded. * You should use the short dh form. Check [5] and dh(1) for examples. Most people consider the old-style debhelper form deprecated. While you are it, remove the source and diff targets. They are obsolete since ages it appears. * The package breaks the hardening release goal [6]. See [7] to learn how to apply hardening flags. * Since you upgraded to 3.0/quilt there is no point to add manpages as a patch anymore. Just put the file into debian/ and install it as I outlined above. * patches/xeji_c.patch misses an appropriate DEP-3 header (that's optional again) * Don't override I: and W: tags in Lintian. Moreover, note your explanation for overriding copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl is wrong. That's not what the tag is about. * Remove the README.Debian file. The URL is dead and its information is redundant to debian/copyright. [1] bugs.debian.org/592977 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xeji [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis [4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny [6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags [7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html [8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK0SpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQKMP/jktuMN/RzQDF2YfoKnCzbLx VXb9mB9jx1fdFTpqAXu6ANpnTeaa1gvBhoMrpqxVWGakgqFT2ctbp3l9xHmTEKhB /SftLz+/AyDPREt99p3Mv1GXbWeo7tWLrIr++vnW95fm62g2VNxR0qpjzyejvK6S agE/oOiQU2R1OoSj10GhMREZOWCU77DkVOd99XJjC77/4N7BLOC0xk+SKKtsz+9d 2ARsS+VfypBnvtF6rphvoHiV4r8gZOrSJ3KvWo5VNJ+S+d3YLlZIgRx4anoqe1dx 3inUhWPTxDO45tGNP7f5vwbWwDBykqjCsAKM/Vl5HVcJf+pOQ9IHxcSiBXFfq1Zs HDd7YfrtogZB570OINvoMBgOtVIFf5scpsyI2/F5VqVA7NtUZaIWWpbr3Tb6qzWD V1n3HuXmnv3CpW/DKrMt/psK1QR2PvqH2R5x6fE4xggTgKG+VdRXMmVJKO7vvPlT /XEpWvNCA7uWhb3x8oXM2X0FHe5b9Na6ISZbyWprzPVRdUAD1JoPHjeAC16xG6Et k77bCT9fp2GaWzs3IYq8nzwiK56q5307ouAXZwNrj7/EgQbhFTrJufE/nWnNnrrF 4F/PXAHBbt82WTaskRaabD8RbqWVt4IyJeHTav4qJvulb057dzeHYp4bN9RHPZJH 0ezb6XBuHhAhK7DBgtqT =6oHw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b44a9.8060...@toell.net
Processed: Re: Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Added tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Added tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132823569524021.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
