* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-13, 20:13:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over source
from Micahel. After reading man page for *ld*
On 11:18 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-13, 20:13:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over
source
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-15, 17:22:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over
source from Micahel. After reading man page for *ld*
On 17:08 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-15, 17:22:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took
over source from
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:46:14 +0100
with message-id 20121115194614.ga5...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683184,
regarding RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-13, 20:13:
Changelog now reads: Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X
Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License name. But
in 38-2 there were no spaces in short license names.
[...]
Ah this is what happened in previous mail
On 18:37 Wed 14 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-13, 20:13:
Changelog now reads: Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X
Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License
name. But in 38-2 there were no spaces in short license names.
On 18:49 Mon 12 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-11, 12:55:
Done changed to Expat License.
Changelog now reads: Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X
Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License name.
But in 38-2 there were no
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-11, 12:55:
Done changed to Expat License.
Changelog now reads: Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X
Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License name. But
in 38-2 there were no spaces in short license names.
Please
Jakub Wilk wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:38:28 GMT) :
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that intentional?
As far
as I can see, this change is not documented in the changelog.
Yes file is introduced to suppress the
On 09:20 Sun 11 Nov , intrigeri wrote:
Jakub Wilk wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:38:28 GMT) :
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
intentional? As far
as I can see, this change is not documented in the
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
intentional? As far as I can see, this change is not documented in the
changelog.
Yes file is introduced to suppress the lintian warning. Do you think I
need to remove that
On 01:38 Sun 11 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
intentional? As far as I can see, this change is not documented
in the changelog.
Yes file is introduced to suppress the lintian
On 17:55 Wed 07 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
Addition of debian/README.slock.Debian doesn't seem to be documented
in the changelog.
Done now.. Sorry I missed that file also I updated the file now to
reflect changes in slock 1.1
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
Addition of debian/README.slock.Debian doesn't seem to be documented in
the changelog.
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
intentional? As far as I can see, this change is not documented in the
changelog.
* Merge new version 39 - sorry, what does it mean? AFAIUI the
On 20:33 Sun 04 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-30, 20:32:
.hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be
removed from the repository, too.
Done and changes back in the git.
I don't see any relevant changes in the repository…
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-30, 20:32:
.hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be
removed from the repository, too.
Done and changes back in the git.
I don't see any relevant changes in the repository…
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 17:59 Mon 29 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 23:06:
Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted
copyright to its original format and modified create_orig_source
to refer dl.suckless.org.
I can't build source package anymore:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 23:06:
Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted copyright to
its original format and modified create_orig_source to refer
dl.suckless.org.
I can't build source package anymore:
| dpkg-source: info: local changes detected,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
I can't build source package anymore:
| dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
| git/sprop/.hg_archival.txt
| dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source
--commit
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 10:45:
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific revision
of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. That would make
the script more deterministic.
Done.
Okay, how about this patch? (see attachment)
I wonder what
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 10:45:
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific
revision of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip.
That would make the script more deterministic.
Done.
Okay, how
On 19:27 Sun 28 Oct , Vasudev Kamath wrote:
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 10:45:
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific
revision of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip.
That would make
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
snipped out as this is not relevant for this reply
Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted copyright to
its original format and modified create_orig_source to refer
dl.suckless.org.
Changes are back in the git
Best Regards
--
On 16:09 Thu 25 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-25, 11:54:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for
sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific
revision of prop (currently
On 22:23 Tue 09 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for
sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific revision
of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. That would make
the script more
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-25, 11:54:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop
(i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific revision of
prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. That would make
Vasudev Kamath wrote (15 Oct 2012 17:38:41 GMT) :
On 19:08 Mon 15 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
I think you should read the documentation about -s ours,
before concluding you can't merge it back to master.
Tried that but what here happens is wheezy branch is based on master
which doesn't have
::control_line('line', 'close -2',
'clonebugs', 'HASH(0x1b19e50)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x1b21ff0)',
'common_control_options', 'ARRAY(0x1b220c8)', 'errors', ...) called at
/usr/lib/debbugs/process line 1035
retitle -1 RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
Bug #683184 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: suckless-tools/38
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: close -2
Control: retitle -1 RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
I uploaded suckless-tools 38-2. Release Team normally notices and
unblocks uploads fixing RC bugs themselves, but if this doesn't happen
in a few days, please request an unblock (reportbug release.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:20:14 +
with message-id e1towlu-0005ut...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683184,
regarding RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Control: reopen -1
* Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org, 2012-10-17, 16:20:
Package suckless-tools has been removed from mentors.
That's not a reason to close an RFS.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #683184 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org}
[sponsorship-requests] RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #683184 to the same values
previously set
--
683184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On 23:28 Mon 15 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-15, 20:13:
Now understood the issue correctly. I was using pdebuild and I
don't know how it started considering 38-2 as the orig tarball!
Well now I used the git-buildpackage and it looks fine.
On 22:28 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-14, 16:09:
W: suckless-tools source: native-package-with-dash-version
Yeah I saw these but I think changing the version number will
cause lot of problem right?
It's not the version that is wrong.
On 14:53 Sun 14 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
(meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;)
Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) :
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me
FWIW it feels wrong to me to.
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (15 Oct 2012 03:43:55 GMT) :
* git checkout master git merge -s ours squeeze
Well I don't really think I can merge it back to master!
I think you should read the documentation about -s ours,
before concluding you can't merge it back to master.
Well unfortunately
On 19:08 Mon 15 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (15 Oct 2012 03:43:55 GMT) :
* git checkout master git merge -s ours squeeze
Well I don't really think I can merge it back to master!
I think you should read the documentation about -s ours,
before concluding you
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-15, 20:13:
Now understood the issue correctly. I was using pdebuild and I don't
know how it started considering 38-2 as the orig tarball! Well now I
used the git-buildpackage and it looks fine.
Indeed, it looks okay now.
Why are there 2
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Indeed, it looks okay now.
Why are there 2 newlines between the paragraphs in debian/control? It's not
clear to me whether this is compliant with Policy §5.1 (though admittedly
both dpkg and debhelper parsers are happy about
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-13, 22:10:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611)
Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy.
But in this case the required changes are small enough that
hopefully the Release Team won't mind.
Just
On 11:45 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-13, 22:10:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611)
Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze
policy. But in this case the required changes are small
enough that
Hi,
(meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;)
Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) :
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me
FWIW it feels wrong to me to. That's what branches are for.
Note that branches in the
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-14, 16:09:
W: suckless-tools source: native-package-with-dash-version
Yeah I saw these but I think changing the version number will cause lot
of problem right?
It's not the version that is wrong. -1 was a non-native package, and so
should be
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:23 PM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
(meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;)
Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) :
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me
FWIW it
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
It's not the version that is wrong. -1 was a non-native package, and so
should be -2. Quoting the tag description:
Native source packages are sometimes created by accident. In most cases the
reason is the location of the
On 20:53 Thu 11 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-11, 22:34:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
*
On 22:10 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 21:55:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
*
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-11, 22:34:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
* debian/copyright:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0.
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-11, 09:17:
Additionally I gave new repository name as suckless-tools-wheezy.git
I've not created it yet on collab just would like to know if name is
okay or you can suggest me better name ;)
I'm not a git expert, but isn't it usual to keep
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
license headers - what's that?
Err..
I noticed another flaw of the current copyright file: the license for
st/* is wrong. Please fix this, too.
Fixed!
You fixed the license short name (well, almost; it should be:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me, but I'm not really
qualified to give you any advice. Maybe other -mentors@ readers could chime
in?
Well it is actually wrong but I can't see other altenative but I
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 09:16:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop
(i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian
copyright-format [0] this field can be free form text which means I can
On 11:03 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 09:16:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for
sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian
copyright-format [0] this
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 21:55:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
* debian/copyright:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy. But in
this case the required changes are small enough that hopefully the Release
Team won't mind.
Do you think I should change the Phrase like added the
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop
(i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific revision of
prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. That would make the
script more deterministic.
Would you mind preparing
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop (i.e.
hg.suckless.org) too?
Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian
copyright-format [0]
this field can be free form text which means I
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong directory,
too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the current directory.” —
Policy §4.9)
Hmm.. So I need to leave the tarballs in the directory from where
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-08-31, 16:40:
Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong
directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the current
directory.” — Policy §4.9)
Hmm.. So I need to leave the tarballs in the directory from where rules
On 13:16 Fri 31 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-08-31, 16:40:
Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong
directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the
current directory.” — Policy §4.9)
Hmm.. So I need to leave the
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-08-25, 13:02:
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball in
the wrong directory.
Fixed
Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong
directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the current
On 20:32 Fri 24 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball
in the wrong directory.
Ok I messed up. It was fine till I didn't introduced the mktemp to
create secure tmp directory. But when I did I forgot to check where on
earth the .orig.tar.gz
On 20:32 Fri 24 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball
in the wrong directory.
Fixed
Why do you redirect tar's stderr to /dev/null?
Removed this too
I recommend passing these options to tar, so that the user's
name/group/umask are not
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball in
the wrong directory.
Why do you redirect tar's stderr to /dev/null?
I recommend passing these options to tar, so that the user's
name/group/umask are not leaked:
--owner root --group root --mode a+rX
Have you seen
On 15:49 Mon 20 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-08-18, 22:07:
get-orig-source: TMPDIR :=$(shell (mktemp --tmpdir -d suckless-tools.))
It looks like a nice hack, but... it will create a temporary
directory every time debian/rules is run (not only
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-08-18, 22:07:
get-orig-source: TMPDIR :=$(shell (mktemp --tmpdir -d suckless-tools.))
It looks like a nice hack, but... it will create a temporary directory
every time debian/rules is run (not only for the get-orig-source
target).
Since
On 20:46 Thu 16 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-07-30, 21:56:
It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it
s/unstable/experimental/.
Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release?
Yes, after wheezy is released.
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-07-30, 21:56:
It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it
s/unstable/experimental/.
Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release?
Yes, after wheezy is released.
+-$ $(tabbed -d /tmp/tabbed.xid); urxvt
This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review this
properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it for me. :)
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-07-29, 22:27:
dget -x
On 10:48 Mon 30 Jul , Jakub Wilk wrote:
This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review
this properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it
for me. :)
Thanks.. Wonder how many more silly stuffs show up on actual review
;-)
* Vasudev Kamath
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package suckless-tools
* Package name: suckless-tools
Version : 39-1
Upstream Author : Suckless community (multiple authors)
* URL : http://suckless.org
* License
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stummvoll mich...@stummi.org wrote:
I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package:
* dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe.
* included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package.
* changed slock to
Hi mentors,
I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package:
* dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe.
* included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package.
* changed slock to not suid root but setgid shadow
* changed to quilt sourceformat with
Hi, thanks.
Now i just need anybody who uploads it :)
Regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f192d08.30...@stummi.org
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my fresh adopted package suckless-tools.
* Package name: suckless-tools
Version : 39-1
Upstream Author : Serval (look at the projects in the URL for more info)
* URL : http://tools.suckless.org/
* License : MIT
Wow, thanks for that work.
Michael Stummvoll mich...@stummi.org wrote:
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my fresh adopted package
suckless-tools.
* Package name: suckless-tools
Version : 39-1
Upstream Author : Serval (look at the projects in the URL for more
info)
*
77 matches
Mail list logo
