Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote: I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can imagine that takes a lot of time.

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
David Roguin nesda...@gmail.com wrote on 2012-02-20 21:40: Hi, I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can imagine that takes a lot of time. That's why I'm asking if there's a faster way to

regarding the code to test from Carl-Valentin Schmitt

2012-02-21 Thread Martin Steigerwald
I am not subscribed to this list. Hi! I suggest you not to put any more energy into it - in case you didn´t already notice yourself. From what I have seen from Carl-Valentin Schmitt - whether that is his real name or not I do not know - on debian-user-german[1], kernel-testers

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client

2012-02-21 Thread Benoît Knecht
block 660125 with 660128 thanks Hi Daniel, Daniel Martí wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package heybuddy. * Package name: heybuddy Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Jezra Johnson Lickter je...@jezra.net * URL :

Processed: Re: Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client

2012-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 660125 with 660128 Bug #660125 [wnpp] ITP: heybuddy - light identi.ca microblogging client Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 660125: 660128 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote: I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want to test a tiny change I build a deb, install

Bug#660049: typo

2012-02-21 Thread David Banks
Obviously I meant mosh and not 'hello'. It was late. :) Cheers, -- David Banks  amoe...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Is there a public-facing page of the various autobuilders ? more specifically hardware specs.

2012-02-21 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, First of all I'm not a coder or a developer in anyway. So sorry for butting onto the mailing list like this but don't know any place better. So please either tell/share if there is a better mailing list for the same or answer it here. Please CC me in replies as I'm not subscribed to

Re: Is there a public-facing page of the various autobuilders ? more specifically hardware specs.

2012-02-21 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- 2012/2/21 shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com: Unfortunately though, most of the URI's shared don't  seem to get/have a public-facing webpage . For instance to take the above e.g. both [09] [10]  and don't seem to have a public-facing webpage via browser. Did get my answer

Re: Is there a public-facing page of the various autobuilders ? more specifically hardware specs.

2012-02-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, I think -project@ might be a better list for this. On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote: The info. I'm looking for is the physical infrastructure as to the kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network are and if they are located at diverse locations (or not). [DB]

Re: Is there a public-facing page of the various autobuilders ? more specifically hardware specs.

2012-02-21 Thread shirish शिरीष
in-line :- 2012/2/21 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org: Hi, I think -project@ might be a better list for this. On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote: The info. I'm looking for  is the physical infrastructure as to the kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network are

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwarf-fortress. That's good news. Unfortunately, the package is not ready yet. dwarf-fortress-bin - Dwarf Fortress binaries dwarf-fortress-data - Dwarf Fortress data files

Re: Mentors upload authentication

2012-02-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Michael Gilbert In this case, I think it would be possible to use ssh public keys as that authentication. The process would be: This seems overly complex, why not just have the user put all those files in a well-known location on alioth (or some other host) and have the mentors code

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Beren Minor
Hi and thanks for you interest, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: Did you try to contact the previous ITP owner? I did, a year ago and before as well. The answer I got was it's still work in progress, we are trying to talk with the upstream author to have

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Etienne Millon
I'm not a Debian Maintainer and I'm also looking for advices and comment on the way the game has been packaged, as the available upstream binaries are 32bits only, and I had to embed 32bit libraries with the package in order to have it work. You should not embed libraries. You also

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:48:50PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: The other correct way, as far as I could see, to have an i386 package available on amd64 is to use ia32-libs package, however this package does not contain all the required dependencies for dwarf-fortress (sdl-ttf, sdl-image and glew

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Beren Minor
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: For the reference: #598909. Also, glew doesn't seem to be needed. That's what I was talking about. There's no answer to this bug and no willing to add the sdl libraries to ia32-libs, because the ia32-libs is though to be

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:15:00PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: I'm not talking about patches, gbp and gbp-pq. I mean git checkout magic in your Makefile. As with any other standalone Debian package, dget --build for .dsc URL or dpkg-source -x and dpkg-buildpackage for downloaded one. You

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Beren Minor
Or make use of format 3.0 multi-orig feature. That seems interesting, is it supported by git-buildpackage? #561071 makes me think it is not... -- Beren Minor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client

2012-02-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org, 2012-02-21, 13:36: In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it should only run during configure. What's wrong with running it unconditionally? As far as I know, none of the Python helpers in the wild create maintainer script

Bug#660774: RFS: gnash [DM uploads to bpo]

2012-02-21 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Package: sponsorship-requests Hi, following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. Could anyone please upload gnash to backports for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10-3~bpo60+1.dsc [it should go in testing tomorrow] Thanks. -- Gabriele [0]

Bug#658235: RFS: libjreen, the xmpp library (3rd try, 2 months later)

2012-02-21 Thread Vsevolod Velichko
Dear Benoît, I'm very thankful for your package review. I've just fixed most of the things you mentioned. However, there're a couple of moments I'm unsure. I: libjreen1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libjreen.so.1.0.1 There was a long C++ vs symbols discussion[1] recently with pros and

Re: RFS: lftp-gtk

2012-02-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, maintai...@lftp-gtk.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package lftp-gtk. * Package name: lftp-gtk Version : 1.5 * URL : [http://www.lftp-gtk.com] * License : [gpl-2.0] Section : web the package is far from meeting

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client

2012-02-21 Thread Benoît Knecht
Jakub Wilk wrote: * Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org, 2012-02-21, 13:36: In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it should only run during configure. What's wrong with running it unconditionally? Nothing wrong per se, it just seemed unnecessary... As far as I

Bug#658235: RFS: libjreen, the xmpp library (3rd try, 2 months later)

2012-02-21 Thread Benoît Knecht
Vsevolod Velichko wrote: I'm very thankful for your package review. I've just fixed most of the things you mentioned. However, there're a couple of moments I'm unsure. I: libjreen1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libjreen.so.1.0.1 There was a long C++ vs symbols discussion[1]

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Beren Minor
I've updated the packages on mentors and splitted the original one in two. There's the main dwarf-fortress with binaries, data files and scripts for modding support, and the default graphic mod package that is also required. I've not re-uploaded the other third-party mods for now but they would be

Processed: merge

2012-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 627141 with 660519 Bug #627141 [wnpp] ITP: manaplus -- Advanced client Evol for Online and The Mana World Bug #627142 [wnpp] ITP: manaplus -- Advanced client Evol for Online and The Mana World Was blocked by: 658713 Added blocking bug(s)

versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally released version 2.54, so now I plan to upload an upstream version of my package with version 2.54.

Re: Bug#652826: Bug#624991: Bug#652826: RFS: logkeys (fixing RC bugs)

2012-02-21 Thread Vedran Furač
On 19.02.2012 14:11, Julien Cristau wrote: Hi Vedran, Hey, On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote: On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the upload? I am and I would be willing.

Bug#660519: RFS: manaplus/1.2.2.19

2012-02-21 Thread Paul Wise
Here is another review of manaplus: If you contact upstream as a result of this review, please point them at these two pages: http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Games/Upstream Did you intend for this to be maintained as part of the Debian games team? Do you

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. You should have used 2.54~cvs20120219 instead, since that sorts before 2.54 (note the special ~ character). Meanwhile, more

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net, 2012-02-22, 01:46: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally released version 2.54, so now I plan to upload an

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the prompt reply. On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. You should have used 2.54~cvs20120219 instead, since that

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 22/02/12 02:41, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net, 2012-02-22, 01:46: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally released version

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread David Roguin
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:59 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote: I'm making some changes to the evolution package and

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Bartosz Feński
W dniu 22.02.2012 02:42, Jerome BENOIT pisze: Thanks for the prompt reply. On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version. You should

Re: versioning trouble

2012-02-21 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the precision: versionning with cvs really confused me. On 22/02/12 05:43, Bartosz Feński wrote: W dniu 22.02.2012 02:42, Jerome BENOIT pisze: Thanks for the prompt reply. On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Three days ago I