Bug#901134: RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP]

2018-06-13 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi Ben! Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)? This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and binder) that are already in mainline since a long time ago. This strikes me as thoroughly wrong, yet I'm very ignorant about packaged kernels, thus I can't

Bug#901485: RFS: runescape/0.2-2 -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world

2018-06-13 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runescape" * Package name: runescape Version : 0.2-2 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://gitlab.com/coringao/runescape * License

Bug#901134: RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP]

2018-06-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi Ben! > Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)? > > This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and > binder) that are already in mainline since a long time ago. This strikes me > as thorough

Bug#901134: RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP]

2018-06-13 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:09 AM Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > I do wonder what the value of enabling these as in-tree modules would > be. I don't think we package the many Android userspace services and > libraries that would be needed to run Android apps. So how would these > modules be useful?

Bug#901134: RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP]

2018-06-13 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:09:39AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Hi Ben! > > Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)? > > > > This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and > > binder) that ar