Hi Ben!
Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)?
This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and
binder) that are already in mainline since a long time ago. This strikes me
as thoroughly wrong, yet I'm very ignorant about packaged kernels, thus I
can't
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runescape"
* Package name: runescape
Version : 0.2-2
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://gitlab.com/coringao/runescape
* License
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi Ben!
> Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)?
>
> This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and
> binder) that are already in mainline since a long time ago. This strikes me
> as thorough
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:09 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> I do wonder what the value of enabling these as in-tree modules would
> be. I don't think we package the many Android userspace services and
> libraries that would be needed to run Android apps. So how would these
> modules be useful?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:09:39AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Hi Ben!
> > Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)?
> >
> > This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and
> > binder) that ar
5 matches
Mail list logo