Bug#989424: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec

2021-06-03 Thread Sven Hartge
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License

Bug#981794: RFS: gftools/0.5.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Google Fonts Tools

2021-06-03 Thread Tobias Frost
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 11:57:51PM +0200, Romain Porte wrote: > Hi tobi, > > On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:02:06 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote: > > I have fixed this issue by renaming the dependency to the correct name > (python3-ots instead of python3-opentype-sanitizer). New package version > has just

Bug#988484: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-06-03 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Bastian" == Bastian Germann writes: Bastian> There are H.264 patents that are applicable. I do not know Bastian> how the existing H.264 implementations in Debian handle Bastian> this, e.g. x264 or ffmpeg. According to the legal FAQ, Bastian> these seem to be ignored. I

Bug#989424: marked as done (RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Jun 2021 18:54:19 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec has caused the Debian Bug report #989424, regarding RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec to

Bug#981794: RFS: gftools/0.5.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Google Fonts Tools

2021-06-03 Thread Romain Porte
03/06/2021 09:27, Tobias Frost : > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 11:57:51PM +0200, Romain Porte wrote: >> Hi tobi, >> >> On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:02:06 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote: >> >> I have fixed this issue by renaming the dependency to the correct name >> (python3-ots instead of