Dear mentors and games team,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package steam-powered.
* Package name: steam-powered
Version : 5
Upstream Author : Michael Gilbert
* URL : no website
* License : gpl
Section : contrib/games
It builds these binary
So you think having it debian native is a good thing?
sure, why not? the guts of the program are so simple that i don't
think it would really be that useful to set up a website or svn. in a
sense www.steampowered.com perhaps should be considered the upsteam?
this package is just a wrapper to
Bjoern Boschman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I build your packages and installed steam-powered and counter-strike
steam-powered downloaded
http://www.steampowered.com/download/SteamInstall.msi but it seems that
it was not installed
when I run
Are there free games available on the steam plattform?
sadly there are no steam games that are free of cost. however, it is
free of cost to run the steam application itself, to use it to browse
their pages, to use their communicator to chat with friends, and to
play no-cost game demos.
I ask
The users *are* free to choose the software that's out there. The
Debian project is also free to refuse to choose what software it
distributes.
the key word is distribution. the question is whether the part of
the software to be added to the archive is distributable. for
steam-powered, all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: steam-powered
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Michael Gilbert
* URL : no website
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : Valve's steam game content
This sub-thread is discussing whether we *want* software in Debian
whose only purpose is to sell non-free software.
like i said before, the purpose of the package is to help the average
user to easily run the software of their choice on linux. steam does
include a store, but it is by no means
I for one would prefer not to concentrate too much in adding that
kind of software to Debian, and even less in trying to promote it
if there's no real demand for it beforehand.
there is demand. 90% of computer users play games, and steam has a
lot of users (3 million players per month [1]).
hello,
i tried to sign up for a mentors account today
(http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-signup), but got the
following error, which appears to be a mailserver failure:
Traceback (most recent call last): File
/home/www/mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-signup, line 99,
in ?
Dear mentors and game maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package steam-powered.
* Package name: steam-powered
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Michael Gilbert
* URL : no web site
* License : gpl for steam-powered script, non-free for
downloaded
On 6/27/07, Ben Finney wrote:
What license do you have for the package? non-free isn't a license,
it's a descriptor.
the entire contents of the steam-powered package are fully licensed
under the GPL (there is no non-free content in the package). however,
the steam-powered script does download
On 6/29/07, Rob Andrews wrote:
The Architecture entry in the control file is any - wine is only
available[0] on i386 and amd64, so build will fail on other architectures.
You should match wine's Architecture line.
i've now modified the control file so that the package will be built
only for
On 6/29/07, Jon Dowland wrote:
Just a few suggestions:
1) I'd add 'set -u' and 'set -e' to the top of
steam-powered: I do this for every shell script I write.
This might require some of the script to be re-written
to cope with unbound variables, etc.
i've added set -u to the script.
Hi,
I just wanted to join the growing chorus of supporter for this
proposal. I think its wonderful, and that's only partially because I
resurrected the discussion a few months ago.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Wed Jan 18, 2012 at 08:40:34 +0100, Raphael
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 18.01.2012 08:40, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Dear DSA, do you think it's possible to have a CNAME mentors.debian.org
pointing to mentors.debian.net? It's currently not hosted on a .d.o
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
difficult to follow for newcomers.
That statement actually describes the Debian project as a
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu, 2012-01-19, 17:24:
I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
checking only package with with
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting
facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making
mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian,
just like any other core team,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
Hence, please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package with
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package owner and we can get started.
This seems like a good name to me as well.
I still need the text
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
'new': a sponsorship request for a brand new package,
'update': a sponsorship request for an update to a
package you've gotten sponsored and uploaded
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
One thought I had recently was to move the file hosting functionality
over to alioth, which already has the necessary authentication
infrastructure. The process
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get
SSH access to alioth:
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_...
They could be made part of a new contributors project to start them
out.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Michael Gilbert said:
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
One thought I had recently was to move the file
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
In terms of gpg public keys, the user could simply upload theirs to a
public_html alioth location, which would allow the mentors scraping
algorithms to pick that up. That process itself would be rather
simple, and could be documented in a
Hi,
I'm going to be making some of my time available to review packages.
So, I'm primarily interested in looking at work that fixes
release-critical bugs, security issues, and just regular bugs as well
(i.e. non-maintainer uploads, NMUs). So, if you're the bug fixing
type, this is for you. I
Changes since the last upload are:
* Fixed buffer overruns.
* Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
for their help and for pointing this out.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this package. Since this apparently fixes some
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes since the last upload are:
* Fixed buffer overruns.
* Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
for their help and for pointing
Hi,
I've reviewed this package, and it looks good. A couple other tasks
need to be done though:
1. Please send your nmu debdiff to #658830.
2. Since this is fixing a potential security issue, please send a
message (including patch and a good description of the problem) to
oss-sec [0]
Hi,
I just reviewed this package. It looks good except for a couple issues:
1. bin/credits.rpl seems to be a binary file in the repacked upstream
source (there may be others, but I stopped at that one)
2. I'm not sure that it's good practice to apply the patch directly
within the upstream
Since the last time I did the 20111012-1 package from 2090925-1 it
worked flawlessly with the same dpatch - quilt script, I'm assuming
some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this
package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch.
There were two patches applied in -2 that
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:11:30PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
There were two patches applied in -2 that were cherry-picked from the
upstream version you're working on now. The patch systems will still
be trying to apply those, but quilt
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Martí mv...@mvdan.cc wrote:
Dear Debian Mentors,
A new package can be found up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
Here is the full
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6
upload?
Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it
all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package.
I'm starting
I've read quite a bit on the kfreebsd-i386 problems with ELF, but I
have encountered a different solution in every thread on the internet.
Some said to patch libelf.h, which is sadly not shipped with prelink. We
have libelf-0.7.0.patch, but that patchs a nonexistent file. We do have
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
Dear mentors--
I'm not sure if the etiquette for nag requests has been sorted out
given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but I submitted this RFS two
weeks ago and have not received so much as a nibble. If anyone is able
to devote
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Rütten wrote:
Hi Mike,
do you still have some time available for reviewing NMUs?
If so I would like to point you attention to this one:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676927
Hi,
The bugs solved in your version are not release
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
I see it regularly that sponsors do little modifications of
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
Dear mentors--
I'm not sure if the etiquette for nag requests has been sorted out
given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but I submitted this RFS two
weeks ago and have
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
Hello,
I see that the package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Can the
RFS be closed, or can you restore the package at mentors ?
no package at mentors for RFS 664181 trustmanager 3.0.5-1
no package at mentors for RFS
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an
interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all
architectures, but it builds an Architecture: all package. Something
similar
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
There is no reason shipping 4.0 beta3 rather than latest 4.20.
If we check change Changelog, it is clear that the package get active
uploads until 4.0 beta3 is uploaded.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Christian Welzel wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.2+ds1-3
Hi,
I've just reviewed these changes. The fix
Just to let everyone know, I am making myself available to sponsor
uploads that fix RC bugs. Those uploads may be either NMUs or
maintainer uploads, just make sure to mark your sponsorship-request
with RC and I (and others) will notice it.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I feel like the current for-wheezy and fit-for-wheezy usertags
actually make the sponsorship-requests bug page harder to use than it
needs to be.
In actuality, any bug tagged ITP and QA should not have either of
those tags (since no itp or qa upload is going in until the freeze is
lifted
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
It is possible to target a package for testing during the freeze even
though it does not fix any RC bugs, see everthing other than item one
here:
http://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html
I am certainly well aware of the freeze
Hi,
I remember being rather frustrated during past freezes (before I was a
DD) at the lack of interesting things to do (since the fun stuff like
ITPs tend to go nowhere at these times). I assume there are a lot of
others in a similar situation now, so I just want to give a couple
suggestions.
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be
considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since
as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roundup. I have a dedicated
uploader (Toni Mueller), but another eye on my changes needn't hurt. It
fixes 3 outstanding bugs, one of which is an RC bug.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this.
+ * patch
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
First of all, you are free to view the bug page with the ordering you
prefer. Try using ordering=standard:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=standard
Thanks for the hint. Reverting to
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
mcrypt (2.6.8-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of
overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
I've reviewed this and it looks
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption
of
overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
I've reviewed this and it looks mostly good. However, can you explain
why you chose ERRWIDTH=PATH_MAX+1024
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
improved on that matter.
It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'.
This is more evidence that this tag doesn't actually provide anything useful.
This package was
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
I don't see the point to upload a version of just that to mentors.
Just use:
patch -p 1 80-width patch
, update the changelog and you're done with the NMU.
It gives you a chance to be the one contributing to the release. I'm
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your prompt review.
It seems I wasn't fully aware of the Freeze Policy. I was under a wrong
assumtion that I could make the package's state better during the freeze.
I've spoken with Salvatore who proposed an NMU for
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive enough:
* Fix a bug while upgrading from
control: retitle -1 RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
control: severity -1 normal
Downgrading the severity of this request since an nmu was uploaded to
fix the rc issue.
Before further review, the package will need to be updated to
incorporate the nmu, and at this point the upload should probably
target
control: severity -1 normal
control: retitle -1 RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.3.0
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Lazarus Longwrote:
- Download links updated (Closes: #618650)
(Reported by Sergio Fernandez)
Since there is already a deferred nmu fixing the rc issue, I'm
downgrading the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Lazarus Long wrote:
Hi:
The deferred NMU uploader has canceled it in behalf of mine.
I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I remove my version, or should
it be re-evaluated as a RC bug fix?
Preferably the nmu will be re-uploaded since it's a targeted
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
Hello,
As I wrote earlier on debian-devel [1] I have a few reports [2] about DM
upload
permissions. According to the announcement [3] the permissions only via
DMUA=yes will be revoked on 24th of November 2012, and that date is coming
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
* New Maintainer. (Closes: #544922)
* Eat the Whistle will be maintained in a Git repository from now
on. Change the Vcs-fields in debian/control accordingly.
* debian/patches:
Add
Hi,
I had a quick look through the rc bugs that have a patch:
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_and_sidpatch=onlymerged=igndone=ignfnewerval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=ascchints=1ctags=1cdeferred=1
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
thanks for taking the time to review the changes. Indeed the author of
etw already checks for PATH_MAX in etw.c and stores the result in
TEMP_DIR. On the other hand he uses 1024 bytes for the buffer at most
and truncates the rest if it
Reviewed and uploaded. Thanks!
Make sure to send your debdiff to the bug report to stay in compliance
with nmu rules:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
potentially sponsored:
So, it's been almost a week, and I decided to take a look at where
things stand
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
potentially sponsored:
So, it's been almost
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package redmine
Hi, thanks for working on these issues. I'd like to see a few things
corrected in the changelog, but otherwise it looks good.
* NMU to fix RC bugs.
There is specific
Hi, I've taken a look at the bugs tagged patch, and the following 11
strike me as likely being rather easy to fix.
677861
681457
687396
687848
692129
693208 - seems to just need a tpu upload
693980
694015
694061
694340
694417
So, let's fix these easy 11 bugs!
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:29 AM, roucaries bastien wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package lcdf-typetools
I have found two license problem on this package:
- #694352 lcdf-typetool include non free adobe data; glyph
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil),
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone
uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yui-compressor/yui-compressor_2.4.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/alien-arena-data/alien-arena-data_7.33-0+nmu1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:17:02 -0500 Barry deFreese wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of alien-arena.
Version 7.31 fixed a nasty security issue (CVE-2009-3637), but
the debian package has not been updated even though the upstream
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:24:23 -0600 Scott Howard wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package enet.
I'm not a sponsor, but I work with a package that uses enet's library
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:41:09 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
libjs-protoaculous - A compressed library containing both prototype and
scriptaculous
...
My motivation for maintaining this package is: many
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:35:48 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package protoaculous.
* Package name: protoaculous
Version : 1
Section
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:51:14 +0100 Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 21:10:41, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
[context: I'm the owner of yuicompressor ITP #519938]
I have put together a protoaculous package for the packages currently
embedding it (which
on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/alien-arena
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/alien-arena-data
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:42:55 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yui-compressor.
* Package name: yui-compressor
Version : 2.4.2-1
It builds
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:11:11 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.33-1 of alien-arena
and alien-arena-data.
The package appears to be lintian clean
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:11:11 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
==
review of alien-arena:
==
+ * New upstream release with many feature enhancments
+(closes: #592770, #467387, #437461).
Could you please list the items like:
* New upstream
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:40:28 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Now they look like:
I: alien-arena source: quilt-patch-missing-description
kill-runaway-crded_tool_debianization.patch
I: alien-arena source: quilt-patch-missing-description
rcon_tool_debianization.patch
I: alien-arena source:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:34:49 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
In general it looks good, but you have missed one important thing, if
you split up packages: conflicts and replaces.
Now, if users upgrade from 7.0 to 7.33, dpkg would abort, because the
- -common package include files, which are also
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:56:37 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:34:49 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
In general it looks good, but you have missed one important thing, if
you split up packages
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:27:32 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:56:37 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:03:29 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:27:32 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010
main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/alien-arena/alien-arena_7.33-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
I have prepared an updated package for xpdf that fixes quite a few
security issues (and a couple cosmetic ones as well). The package is
available at [0]. Note that I've built updated etch and lenny packages
there as well, which I am getting sponsorship from the security team.
They can be
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:19:37 +0100 Nico Golde wrote:
Hey,
* Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com [2010-02-07 18:22]:
I have prepared an updated package for xpdf that fixes quite a few
security issues (and a couple cosmetic ones as well). The package is
available at [0]. Note
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:50:07 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:19:37 +0100 Nico Golde wrote:
Hey,
* Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com [2010-02-07 18:22]:
I have prepared an updated package for xpdf that fixes quite a few
security issues (and a couple
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:19:37 +0100 Nico Golde wrote:
Hey,
* Michael Gilbert [2010-02-07 18:22]:
I have prepared an updated package for xpdf that fixes quite a few
security issues (and a couple cosmetic ones as well). The package is
available at [0]. Note that I've built updated etch
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:19:37 +0100 Nico Golde wrote:
Hey,
* Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com [2010-02-07 18:22]:
I have prepared an updated package for xpdf that fixes quite a few
security issues (and a couple cosmetic ones as well). The package is
available at [0]. Note
regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100327145820.a3585b98.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:14:24 +0200 Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Hi Michael!
Il 27/03/2010 19:58, Michael Gilbert ha scritto:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.21-1+nmu1
of my package pulseaudio, which fixes CVE-2009-1299 (bug #573615).
Thanks for your work, I've uploaded
Hi,
I have prepared an update for xpdf, which fixes an RC issue among
others. Would anyone be kind enough to upload this new version?
Best wishes,
Mike
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
~git20100510-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best wishes,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
