Re: upload with name of sponsored person?

On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote: I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible? My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not a debian maintainer yet Ah, finally something I

the right way to handle caps in package/program names

I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a "ripperX" binary. When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package.

Re: Custom package versioning

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote: At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with a newer upstream one. I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from setting the debian

Re: Perl Packages

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL

Re: no arch debs

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote: I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? Hi David, if I understand correctly, all you

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

Hi Paul, I must have missed your previous email. I'm a long-time nedit user, and so am happy to see it continue to be supported. Give me a little time to get a few other things taken care of on my side and I'll review it and prepare an upload. Thank you, Tony On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:45

Re: Building localy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello mentors, Can somebody help me with this error please? $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S is runnig fine... $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc giving me this error Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot? Also,

Re: RFS: prips (adopted and updated)

Uploaded. Feel free to contact me directly for subsequent uploads of this package. Thank you, Tony On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-1 of my package prips. I've adopted the Debian package, and since

Re: RFS: hexer (adopted updated package)

Uploaded. You can contact me directly for future uploads of this package. On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:24 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: - dget

Re: RFS: libj2ssh-java

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:47:43PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: (CC'ed to Debian Mentors). Dear Mentors, Myself and a friend have managed to package libj2ssh-java.

Re: RFS: distributed-net

I'll sponsor this. Cheers, tony On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:54:01PM -0400, James Stark wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package distributed-net. * Package name: distributed-net Version : 2.9012.497-1 Upstream Author : distributed.net * URL

Re: changelog of debian policy?

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hello Harri, Is there a changelog of the Debian policy online? Actually I would have expected a pointer on http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, but maybe I am too blind to see. That depends on what information you need. If you're refering to the packaging of

Re: RFS: ace-of-penguins -- Solitaire-games with penguin-look

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Uploaded. tony Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: * Sat 2006-07-01 jari.aalto AT cante.net (Jari Aalto+mail.linux) I'm looking for sponsor for followin package. Details below. ITA: ace-of-penguins -- Solitaire-games with penguin-look -BEGIN PGP

Re: RFS: python-htmlgen -- library for the generation of HTML

Kevin Coyner wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'python-htmlgen'. This is a great little Python module that generates html pages on the fly. Sponsored. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: libnet-ping-external-perl (updated package)

Hello Eugene, I'm looking at your package now and agree to sponsor it. It appears that you've erased the changelog entry for the NMU of 0.11-0.1 which closed a couple of those bugs. Instead of removing that entry, I suggest that you leave it intact, and then request that the sponsor build with

Re: RFS: xsysinfo

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7-4 of my package xsysinfo. uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: mysql-navigator

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.2-8 of my package mysql-navigator. Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: tstat

Sandro Tosi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tstat. * Package name: tstat Version : 1.01-1 Upstream Author : Dario Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marco Mellia [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/ * License :

Re: RFS: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures

Niko Tyni wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jzip I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sponsored. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Please tell if you found a sponsor

Bart Martens wrote: On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 18:59 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: Dear package maintainers... a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net support email address and I would like to forward the suggestion here. Please tell us if you found a sponsor.

Re: RFS: wmfishtime (updated package)

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.24-5 of my package wmfishtime. Sponsored. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmtz (updated package)

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-7 of my package wmtz. sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmdonkeymon (updated package)

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.91-3 of my package wmdonkeymon. sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmspaceweather (updated package)

Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18 of my package wmspaceweather. sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Subject: RFS: c++-annotations

Hello George, I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far: debian/control: * The package Architecture should be all instead of any - this will prevent the (identical) package from being built for every Debian architecture. * You can remove ${shlibs:Depends} from Depends:

Re: question about reporting bugs on my own package

Satoru Takeuchi wrote: Hi mentors, I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or should I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I briefly read Debian Developer's Reference, but

Re: RFS: rpl -- intelligent recursive search/replace utility

Sponsored (but not yet uploaded). Kevin Coyner wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.4 of my package rpl. The package was recently orphaned. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: logwatch (temporary sponsor)

Sponsored. Cheers, tony Willi Mann wrote: Hi! I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's available from http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: zim (updated package) [sponsored]

Emfox Zhou wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-1 of my package zim. zim_0.16 has been uploaded. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Subject: RFS: shc (updated package) [sponsored]

George Danchev wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.8.6-2 of my package shc. Uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: moc - ncurses based console audio player [sponsored]

Sponsored. By the way, I made one change to the package in debian/changelog; I modified bug number #36452 to be #364524. Regards, tony Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Hi all, could one please upload the new vwrsion of moc? moc (2.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version. *

Re: RFS: wormux (updated package) [sponsored]

This package is being uploaded to experimental now. (It takes a while for me to push 65MB.) Jean Parpaillon wrote: Dear mentors, I've built new packages of Wormux. This is an alpha version of Wormux upstream code so it should go to experimental distro. Is it possible ? It builds these

Re: RFS: radvd (updated package) [sponsored]

Uploaded to the archive. Thanks for updating the package (and for removing all of the {arch} stuff that was in the .diff.gz of the 0.8 version). Cheers, tony Andreas Rottmann wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-1 of my package radvd. It builds these

Re: RFS: zim (updated package) [sponsored]

This has been uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony Emfox Zhou wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.17-1 of my package zim. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFH: Need sponsor for debmirror [UPLOADED]

This has been uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for debmirror 20070123. Preferably someone using it but anyone will do. MfG Goswin http://mrvn.homeip.net/debmirror/ Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:53:14

Re: Better to run multiple configure/make cycles or use separate sources?

Another thing to realize is that the number of binary .debs generated from a source package is dictated by the contents of debian/control. Each Package: stanza indicates another binary .deb to be generated by the package. (Sorry if that's already been mentioned. I didn't see it, and couldn't

Re: RFS: ripit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told: Hi mentors, [...] ripit (3.6.0-0) unstable; urgency=low Fixed to 3.6.0-1. Please notice, that I am looking for an uploader. This isn't a new

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 689980 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-furniture-editor Hi Gabriele, I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload once I

Re: RFS: freeplane - A Java program to create and edit mind maps

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Eric, I have sponsored the upload. Please feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of freeplane. Regards, tony On 07/19/2010 01:15 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package freeplane. *

Re: RFS: cpptasks (fwd to d-java@l.d.o)

Sponsored. Cheers, tony On 07/23/2010 05:35 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2010-07-24 00:29, Chris Baines wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cpptasks. * Package name: cpptasks Version : 1.0~b5-1 Upstream Author : Unknown * URL :

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

On 08/06/2010 07:58 AM, Rémi Debay wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package service-wrapper-java. * Package name : service-wrapper-java Version : 3.5.3-1 Upstream Author : Tanuki Software Ltd * URL : http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/ * License : GPLv2 Section

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java [2nd try]

Hi Remi, I'm still willing to sponsor the package and have looked at your changes - I've just been a little slow. I'll upload this weekend. Thank you, tony On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Rémi Debay wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java [2nd try]

Hello Remi, I have uploaded the package to experimental archive instead of unstable, just for the duration of the freeze. Please feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of this package, and thank you for your contribution to Debian. Cheers, tony On 08/19/2010 04:46 AM, Rémi Debay

updates to upstream packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I have been working with the authors of wanpipe and have some assorted goodies that I'd like to include into my Debian package. dpkg-buildsource does like it when I just add the files to my source tree, I guess since there is nothing to diff them against.

using packages in slink

Hopefully this question isn't too dense, but I'm interested in seeing how others handle this problem. I pointed my hamm system at an ftp server carrying slink and updated my package list. Now dselect wants me to update about 80MB of software on my system. This is ok, I guess, but I happened to

packages with kernel version dependencies

Greetings mentors, I maintain the wanpipe package, which is a set of utilities for use with Sangoma WAN router cards. The binaries have to be compiled with a certain version of the kernel. Moreover, the kernel patches required for the drivers are not part of 2.0.36 or 2.0.37 (the package

Re: how best to maintain a patch

On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote: So I think I'll create a source patch file and add a rule to debian/rules to apply it for each build. The alternative, of course, would be to just apply the patch once to the working source tree, and let the .deb system handle it. I think I like

things broke when I went to dpkg-dev 1.4.1.6

Can anyone give me a clue on where to look for this one? My rules file has not changed (much), and now my package build gets almost to the end and dies with: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory Any help would be appreciated. TIA, tony [EMAIL

Re: debian version numbers for future-maintainers

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, David Coe wrote: I'm ready to create packages, as a future-maintainer, to be handed to my sponsor to be uploaded. Should I set the debian version number to -1 (currently it's -0.6, never had an official maintainer), or should I continue using NMU numbering (i.e. -0.7

Re: binary package version numbers?

On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a recompile of -2. I've seen

Re: RFS: freeplane (updated package)

On 06/08/2011 07:58 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1 of my package freeplane. It builds these binary packages: freeplane - Java program to create and edit mind maps. libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking library.

Re: new pkg: libcrypt-simple-per

Just to make sure we're all talking about the same thing, Sandro, are you referring to this: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/ If so, I think you should have read the introduction more carefully, where the author states: The intended use of such a newly created

Re: RFS: festvox-suopuhe-{mv,lj}: Finnish speakers for Festival

Sponsored. Thanks Niko. tony Niko Tyni wrote: Hi, I'm reposting this since I didn't get any comments last time (a month ago). These are quite simple packages. Please consider sponsoring them. Name: festvox-suopuhe-lj License: LGPL ITP: #341964 Description: Finnish female speaker for

Re: RFS: libcrypt-simple-perl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sponsored and uploaded to the archive. Thanks, tony Sandro Tosi wrote: Hi all, I'm here again in search for a sponsor for libcrypt-simple-perl . Since the first request I've corrected some warning at build-time, changed dependences in

Re: File a bug against my own package?

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl package, I discovered another bug related to the package version for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).

Re: dpkg-signpackage

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote: I would like to sponsor a package of a friend the first time, I (of course) check the package (lintian, install it, etc etc) but what about the next times? what is the best practice?

Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote: Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable, mean, and just generally a jackass ...

Re: File a bug against my own package?

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl package, I discovered another bug related to the package version for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Craig Small wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote: Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl libmng ) both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds to my

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM +1000: *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to put in

Re: How do you upload/build sponsored packages?

Hi Jerome, I build like this: dpkg-buildpackge -rfakeroot -us -uc (actually, I use a little script called dbuild that tacks a $* on the end of the line in case I need to dbuild -sa) Once the packages builds correctly and I've reviewed it, I use debsign [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote: Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable, mean, and just generally a jackass ...

Re: Bug#49648: plib1: Where is -dev package?

On 9 Nov 1999, Falk Hueffner wrote: [snip] Hence, a program compiled with the Version 1 header will crash if linked against the version 2 library. [snip] This makes distributing binary programs very hard if the library is a '.so' because it's very likely that the program will

Re: Devices and patches

Hi David, On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, David Fernandez Vaamonde wrote: The program needs a patch to be applied to the kernel... How can you mark this need in the package ? Should it be automatized? I went though this same thing with wanipe package. If the patch is stable, but unlikely to be part of

Re: ITP and sponsor needed: texdoctk

On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote: I would like to package texdoctk for Debian and I'm looking for a sponsor. Hello Adrian, I'll be happy to sponsor this for you. Regards, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Danger + Survival = Fun http://www.debian.org |(Neil Peart)

Re: How do I *really* get my GPGP key?

at the package. Regards, tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Race is not a competition http://www.debian.org | Sex is not a job description (Peart -) | We hold these truths to be self-evident... On Thu, 4 May 2000, Bruce Korb wrote: Hi, The instructions on: http

Re: what creates a Packages{,.gz} etc. file ?

I did this same thing to setup a Debian mirror at work. If you look carefully, all you have to do is delete the existings Packages.gz files (since they are for a single CD) and mv Packages-cd.gz Packages.gz (do the same for the uncompressed packages). It's a lot easier if you do this with a find

Re: Linux Beginner

On Fri, 12 May 2000, Jay Kelly wrote: I am currently running Windows 2000 as my file server with three clients running Windows 98. Can I replace the Windows 2000 server with Linux and still have the Windows 98 clients log into the Linux server just as before? Any help would be appreciated

Re: is this RC?

On Sun, 21 May 2000, Christian Hammers wrote: /home/gchavdarov/mysql32/mysql-3.22.32# dpkg-buildpackage dpkg-buildpackage: source package is mysql dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.22.32-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules clean

Re: upload with name of sponsored person?

On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote: I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible? My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not a debian maintainer yet Ah, finally something I

OT: Re: Sponsor's responsibilities

On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: On 2915T060004-0700, Rick Younie wrote: Sponsee? Tony made that one up didn't he? I can see the confusion in a couple years when the number of Debian maintainers hits a few million. What's that language you're speaking? Debian you

the right way to handle caps in package/program names

I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a ripperX binary. When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package.

Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball

On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it. It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author without any changes so that the md5sum compares to any

Re: Custom package versioning

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote: At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with a newer upstream one. I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from setting the debian

Re: Perl Packages

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upload packages

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, pp wrote: I make Midgard CMS packages from daily cvs. We already have sid and woody packages. Official existing packages do not work properly , and there is no info from its maintainers , so how may I uplod my packages? I would start by contacting the current Debian

Re: no arch debs

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote: I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? Hi David, if I understand correctly, all you

Bug#695588: RFS: jitsi/1.1.4365-1 [ITP]

On 03/15/2013 03:42 AM, Damian Minkov wrote: Hi, we've just updated the package on mentors.debian.net following the comments we recieved: The dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jitsi/jitsi_2.0.4506.10553-1.dsc Regards Damian Hello Damian, If you

Bug#740035: RFS: sunflow and sweethome3d [DM but 1st upload to backports]

owner 740035 ! tags 740035 +pending thanks Hi Gabriele, I'm working on these. Thanks, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#784831: RFS: gnash/0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1 [1st upload to bpo]

On 05/09/2015 03:46 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi Gabriele, I have built against jessie-backports and uploaded the package. Thank you for the update. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#838749: RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.31-1 [UPLOADED]

On 09/24/2016 02:27 AM, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "csvjdbc" Hi Christopher, Thank you for the update. Uploaded. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Scala 2.10

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>I'm not in the Java packaging community, but from a little searching >>.m2 appears to be created by the Maven build system, and I know for >>sure there is software packaged in Debian that uses Maven, so

Bug#934939: RFS: xlog/2.0.17-1

On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:12:02AM +0200, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlog" > > * Package name: xlog >Version : 2.0.17-1 >Upstream Author : Andy Stewart KB1OIQ >

Bug#934053: RFS: fwlogwatch/1.4-2

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 10:12:08AM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > fwlogwatch (1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium Hi William, Thank you for helping with fwlogwatch. I've taken a look at your updated package and things look really good. I

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers. > > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > > Rober

Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:55:08AM +, min sun wrote: > > Hi mentors! > > I packaged new version of libcommons-validator [1] and uploaded again to > debian mentors[2], please refer to Upload #2 . Hi! I will review and sponsor the upload soon. Thank you for your contribution to Debian!

Bug#1031123: RFS: libcommons-collections4-java/4.4-1 [Team] -- Apache Commons Collections - Extended Collections API for Java

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:43:05PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit: > > Hi, > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > >https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/ > > > If