Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Hi, On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 1:45 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 15/04/2024 à 17:12, Bo YU a écrit : > >> Again, I've seen this issue several times with OCaml packages, but I > >> didn't bother to investigate. It looks like another toolchain issue, > >> which should be fixed in a more

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Hi, Le 15/04/2024 à 17:12, Bo YU a écrit : Again, I've seen this issue several times with OCaml packages, but I didn't bother to investigate. It looks like another toolchain issue, which should be fixed in a more central package, not in bisect-ppx itself. So just leave the lintian warnings as

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Hi, Thanks for your review and loop in me with #1017530. On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 2:03 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Dear Bo, > > Le 14/04/2024 à 16:30, Bo YU a écrit : ... > > ``` > > In fact, the original solution is that I refer to this[1]. But I am > > not sure if this is a toolchain issue

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Dear Bo, Le 14/04/2024 à 16:30, Bo YU a écrit : I would not override dh_dwz nor dh_strip. My opinion is that what you are trying to fix are deficiencies of the toolchain that should be fixed there. First to address dh_strip issue. From what I've researched. The issue was raised by the static

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Hi, On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:18 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Dear Bo, > > Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit : > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx": > > [...] > > I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments. > > Standards-Version is not the latest. > > Upstream

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Hi! Thanks for your review of it quickly. On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:18 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Dear Bo, > > Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit : > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx": > > [...] > > I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments. > >

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Dear Bo, Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx": [...] I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments. Standards-Version is not the latest. Upstream copyright years are missing in debian/copyright. A .cma file is in a "OPT:"

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx": * Package name : bisect-ppx Version : 2.8.3-1 Upstream contact : Xavier Clerc , * URL :