On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you
as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version,
which is meant to be a minimal version.
A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Jerome,
- I would be much more comfortable if you asked the previous
maintainer for comments on the ITP (even if he never answers!)
- You could comment on #691988 explaining why you think the package
should be accepted for Wheezy:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 02/11/2012 16:33, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
Hello:
On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote: package
sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks
I'm removing the
Hello:
On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
improved
Hi Jerome,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:33:06PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
improved on that matter.
It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'.
This is more evidence that this tag doesn't actually provide anything useful.
This package was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 for-wheezy
thanks
Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
Unfortunately this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
improved on that matter.
I don't have time to check the
Hello,
On 31/10/12 14:12, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 for-wheezy
thanks
Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
control: retitle -1 RFS:
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be
considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since
as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To
10 matches
Mail list logo