Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version, which is meant to be a minimal version. A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get quickly a picture of this minimal version. Looks fine to me, thanks for taking care of libpam-ssh! Cheers, /JP -- Jens Peter Secher jpsec...@gmail.com A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5098d115.6080...@gmail.com
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Jerome, - I would be much more comfortable if you asked the previous maintainer for comments on the ITP (even if he never answers!) - You could comment on #691988 explaining why you think the package should be accepted for Wheezy: + insist that two users already requested reintroduction; + explain why you only took action after the freeze (perhaps you used the squeeze version happily before that?); + explain that your RFS was filled in August and that you are not responsible for the 2 month delay since then. - That said, the package still contains non-minimalistic changes. You need to produce a debdiff on the source package in squeeze and your source package and comment on this debdiff. Every single change must relate to fixing a RC bug or a release goal. For instance, I don't get why you made those changes: + why introduce fix-debian-adhoc.patch, build-depend on du-autoreconf etc? This seems to be replacing this: $(MAKE) CFLAGS=$(cflags) -Wl,--version-script,debian/pam_ssh.version which I find simpler and more elegant. Perhaps some of these changes are to fix a bug, please undo whatever is unnecessary and explain (in this bug thread) what is necessary. + Why remove the VCS control field? You should use the repository instead. + the clean rule changes also seem unnecessary. - Perhaps your package will not be unblocked for wheezy. In any case you probably want to upload a new upstream soon enough. I would not upload a new upstream to unstable at this point because it would lower still the chances that the packages makes it into wheezy. However, you can prepare the best possible package with new upstream for experimental. In this package, you can do all the changes you want. I'm willing to sponsor your package (either 1.92 to unstable or 1.97 to experimental, or both) but please try contacting the previous maintainer for comments. Note: I'm subscribed to the RFS, the ITP, and the release.d.o bugs. no need to CC me. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQl4MmAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAEaUP/iZhBeULC/yy5wGvyhTqZXn4 /YIhtTqTxOQA2rNwUMc2jyDYnAu6GpCrYjOz9wmWk2C356SehDkAAD/5rLoAbDKH /DG/ZEUjgjfTcQA2IIu01jnGdSIM3p/D3laq6xaeFXBOYeTQ1DMlmhFVAm8mc74u db+LE/teDlBJF8EQ1IBcOmOHq8xXQacLWngk08NhHwWdAPtMpoLhnuplDGEH3XFM uLH4gJSpPNhk6Py7FOKT7v5VTg90QwNgilPnoBXdOWsQUZLAxWLLnLjNHDB2m6Ed Y7CZfuL/TH3uqtWUR4jmECYbuiiNwtVoFgT537V/6fJD6DDj9K5pWxE3226vCjUL N6Ye3U50lLIdtd8c9D/0SHbPDMR2sMpOsm4Gb/Ko49rqzU9wZHbkbgGtdjXLNg3D A/f+j0cs2+Dj7uPXUXALhvhM92119ePTPPLDZ/Vnk5s3mva+pYEjgr6XT8TzLMUA XQq8/WTqwgrpFQjqcoRFSo7MHtm3eD+ZWeK3GzkDanVoxafmMN5z0GMLtSjSiE8e kjmdZkuqAf6p1Yp6gevtMx8MRUf2/IR/B1eyFdZI927O13MfdVbvZKotriy1KgR/ thVfNIlGMfw+6+tRRs5JyrGMK0grYVOPtW0++ZDiRid9mO0XreB78VU3DQVThOZh uyfjVwH1lhkNiVy8IOle =/ZWo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50978326.10...@debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 02/11/2012 16:33, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : Hello: On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote: package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'. Actually, you have it *again*, I don't know how set it back. I don't have time to check the package right now. Do you have the intention to sponsor it ? I plan on reviewing it in the next few days and sponsor it if it's fine. You will need an unblock in any case for Wheezy. Regards, Thibaut. Best wishes, Jerome Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQlZDeAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAuY0QAIy+pihKHYuIB0EcZtTGASmB x0eIM1guYHscL+X+dhkJwdubVgxKZ3MFEhNq8rx3FCHLUXMXGKig7nXo6vooubaj AuqH2Afzh7bgr7yKiUWM9S4NxCKTPNJeuV9NkEM3Xhg40/IimjDHJyQTmiSSLgf9 nwXVbQhfvQdzgbKd5cUembEcXPXdf5YknnDlc9KLZDEX4muIYcegUHDZwk67lT2y vOWjSFCii3yEvUOjptWvERu+dTeGFsSio3CBSRTy9HkhfwkUfG67SiGJGDIHyY3Z X1nthS76FZqcJK9lGp0zF2ZZtkTRHt1eALHaNICXsjgHyKpbqUS6FnnI15QugmiW YIyShMlRigq+U+Xjy/ZotTptUGz4IHg9qiR04C8cqchRJPy7iaFvvqEZxpUHnWhI n2D+JULci73Ub6fGxYdI5PkbZIOfxul4380BtqWfE1jvLDlsLr0boIMcYay2ho2H V6CpllMP3ts6TQ2NVQ4177P057eXrd447S/VETiSDWNq/EagtJb14+vDWTMs0ucA WzxS+s+hrd2eFrg5sxxPrnSrWp7aY8tTjRyz5WsLgvlPdXXGZHsQiZf4KeJoSWq1 AtNSGpBSgjjdm2deC9XUjW/ag5MiOOt2WukQwDLtDA231CeQFUPcK4gKuJRqOlBV VkUrBvrfMSN8gSVzupHT =YEDk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509590de.2050...@debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Hello: On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'. I don't have time to check the package right now. Do you have the intention to sponsor it ? Best wishes, Jerome Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSlUAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAjuIP/jT956v97Pie/byOMly/r2q+ YhvnLzi7jwUmRTT8eC2ZWzhoNVqQia2eAmfJsx3zbnhQ4WKqq5TPwctOWkEtqBl1 D0HZxFIO3rQkxr1QktoSVfSOTnUm4SG0sPy4gG69vBfRFO74FR4b/oV6ISMVlA+D EgijLmbuJIjyLsQNBlwEcWfx/55AkUCGDT6ql1PPfzzGBctJTn+CgybPGEHrw91Q VizFUIRVyOq+pAhTGMxh4bRyzat55KXyAwjg2Ucbq/xcLKF1BKys31ZEErm4D0LA wZ1PgZbsg/REaqWMvRsB+2TA8upUFp1GIDVxNsy623cGEy60bMZPRnsn4++Wm3ov gqlG/PqWDSc+9GgltjTq/kE7xvNWh9UKagNvpNWx3R/0Zg5beVnKvUXJKzmsACwE EjQM2N2BSra4sf07OQ5UIGDphdxOl+1PCyCV6vpy4ZLgGRPvUMSvOLht3ZZBRrAH BkIR2LcHevVB25WMRWwZWULO095hKQF8lXxzUTJW6yRsWELPNYcjYN9/jx0Irl0+ ei7kkQM2ulz0ADEJjO2QGdQuwfPbzRjufWM3Mh/q5pnvY2q2j789xGIHo+fPtRjR 23Z0QnjKwAJ6N+/IqcOlfbzbY8ePxcwS+v0hR3Llmp6tpzxj59pfe/eW4iLGyAq5 H1gZR4SCVLQ1hsf7V160 =zbuq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5093e7b2.5030...@rezozer.net
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Hi Jerome, On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:33:06PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote: package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'. Currently standing decision by debian-release : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;bug=691988 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121102162042.ga30...@master.debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'. This is more evidence that this tag doesn't actually provide anything useful. This package was removed from unstable, and didn't get back there before the freeze, so it is not a candidate for wheezy based on the release team's guidelines. Even if the sponsoree has high wishes of getting into wheezy at this point, it simply doesn't matter since release team trumps everyone else. That said, if someone wants to sponsor to unstable, that's fine. I'm not going to do it because it's not something I'm interested in. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MMMCofR0KH=4oybioLVrhKq9pcHfi8u0B61PdJp=fq...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 for-wheezy thanks Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit : control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply. Best wishes, Mike Hi, Mike, I don't agree: this package *is* a valid candidate for an unblock, as is every package already in Squeeze. Jerome, seeking pre-approval from the release team would help your case. Since Jerome explicitly said he was targeting wheezy, I'm setting the corresponding usertag. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSOXAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAp6YQAKcc5IvNISt4NHr6661QNZ31 YVsRwxo1QvJeaHqnzjfjamFL/GhWybHMwGbxDYkVzr9HF4Z9XqDkEHRXV2M/I9zx 1kqxpToz8PJz4yk8V3QtHUOgWUnu5W0wZPKYdZOvBpFaO5474tBWCmhhhrgga0G/ PArnu8shH1OjOJsO5gt3PO6pqVPyP0OtCT+jnOfwkZhgf3vIeZ5iXQNZrdwUsCPH vkAlLb99tqb+pOS1shbs5D7EoZ7mJzlgqoNGVgQV+5B2go9wAvBSN/D3aghyse8H wdPVuKGDqg8VesFC3cnmHYahFwJ2QmHGqSx1alPsCQdUVHXcGMHkzyaFg+WXm/vX cMP0JGQ7IUeeUe1gYrFzw66sSjvbXWyNdKvViciJwWSAzSl2cJOBb0RRlq7xcNE3 Kn6s2RQzbdUt10/cOBXgzK/Z57IKS5Xs3UIqz89raMBlcZ5jTXg0AHcvumHK9k+3 B98z6ln1eBao4bISqE6f1/+EH3tL0QAVk51Vcqqjrsdai4EKJWp6Ro+nrfxWw+zg W3vYp59KnSNDMM8irf9tZIkCDmhAlRY2wVLya8AaG1Xf+0E0L9UGcrFwhlr3aIEz I7RxtzpJoNvthFge992yQcmW773/3ixFVCfY8BYScpK8oi7hbtcUEOGHHJOXBTsX RhPXXu/rhVZ/0kCwvhV5 =x0ZV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509123a0.6040...@debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. I don't have time to check the package right now. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSlUAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAjuIP/jT956v97Pie/byOMly/r2q+ YhvnLzi7jwUmRTT8eC2ZWzhoNVqQia2eAmfJsx3zbnhQ4WKqq5TPwctOWkEtqBl1 D0HZxFIO3rQkxr1QktoSVfSOTnUm4SG0sPy4gG69vBfRFO74FR4b/oV6ISMVlA+D EgijLmbuJIjyLsQNBlwEcWfx/55AkUCGDT6ql1PPfzzGBctJTn+CgybPGEHrw91Q VizFUIRVyOq+pAhTGMxh4bRyzat55KXyAwjg2Ucbq/xcLKF1BKys31ZEErm4D0LA wZ1PgZbsg/REaqWMvRsB+2TA8upUFp1GIDVxNsy623cGEy60bMZPRnsn4++Wm3ov gqlG/PqWDSc+9GgltjTq/kE7xvNWh9UKagNvpNWx3R/0Zg5beVnKvUXJKzmsACwE EjQM2N2BSra4sf07OQ5UIGDphdxOl+1PCyCV6vpy4ZLgGRPvUMSvOLht3ZZBRrAH BkIR2LcHevVB25WMRWwZWULO095hKQF8lXxzUTJW6yRsWELPNYcjYN9/jx0Irl0+ ei7kkQM2ulz0ADEJjO2QGdQuwfPbzRjufWM3Mh/q5pnvY2q2j789xGIHo+fPtRjR 23Z0QnjKwAJ6N+/IqcOlfbzbY8ePxcwS+v0hR3Llmp6tpzxj59pfe/eW4iLGyAq5 H1gZR4SCVLQ1hsf7V160 =zbuq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50912954.1070...@debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Hello, On 31/10/12 14:12, Thibaut Paumard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 for-wheezy thanks Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit : control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply. Best wishes, Mike Hi, Mike, I don't agree: this package *is* a valid candidate for an unblock, as is every package already in Squeeze. Jerome, seeking pre-approval from the release team would help your case. I have just filled a bug report in this sense to release.debian.org : #691988 Since Jerome explicitly said he was targeting wheezy, I'm setting the corresponding usertag. Regards, Thibaut. Best wishes, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSOXAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAp6YQAKcc5IvNISt4NHr6661QNZ31 YVsRwxo1QvJeaHqnzjfjamFL/GhWybHMwGbxDYkVzr9HF4Z9XqDkEHRXV2M/I9zx 1kqxpToz8PJz4yk8V3QtHUOgWUnu5W0wZPKYdZOvBpFaO5474tBWCmhhhrgga0G/ PArnu8shH1OjOJsO5gt3PO6pqVPyP0OtCT+jnOfwkZhgf3vIeZ5iXQNZrdwUsCPH vkAlLb99tqb+pOS1shbs5D7EoZ7mJzlgqoNGVgQV+5B2go9wAvBSN/D3aghyse8H wdPVuKGDqg8VesFC3cnmHYahFwJ2QmHGqSx1alPsCQdUVHXcGMHkzyaFg+WXm/vX cMP0JGQ7IUeeUe1gYrFzw66sSjvbXWyNdKvViciJwWSAzSl2cJOBb0RRlq7xcNE3 Kn6s2RQzbdUt10/cOBXgzK/Z57IKS5Xs3UIqz89raMBlcZ5jTXg0AHcvumHK9k+3 B98z6ln1eBao4bISqE6f1/+EH3tL0QAVk51Vcqqjrsdai4EKJWp6Ro+nrfxWw+zg W3vYp59KnSNDMM8irf9tZIkCDmhAlRY2wVLya8AaG1Xf+0E0L9UGcrFwhlr3aIEz I7RxtzpJoNvthFge992yQcmW773/3ixFVCfY8BYScpK8oi7hbtcUEOGHHJOXBTsX RhPXXu/rhVZ/0kCwvhV5 =x0ZV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5091b0e4.6070...@rezozer.net
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MOOz2jCN=_e=EbUcMuUB74y4k=54bcaixe8ybbgfu1...@mail.gmail.com
