Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2018-02-06 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 05 Feb 2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: >I think you will also need to clean up the generated file, e.g. put it >into debian/clean. Indeed. All these changes are now pushed as: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/commit/1bbccc5353cbe2bb85bc9f487a632cace01c8aa9 As usual, the file at

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2018-02-05 Thread Juhani Numminen
Gabriel F. T. Gomes kirjoitti 04.02.2018 klo 23:05: > On 03 Feb 2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: > >> Instead of doing version parsing the hard way, could you perhaps >> include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk and use a suitable variable that >> it defines? > > Indeed, but you also made me realize that

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA] (was: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging)

2018-02-04 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 03 Feb 2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: > >Quick note regarding debian/rules (which I only read online). >https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/blob/unstable/debian/rules > >debhelper(7) manpage tells me that autoreconf is enabled by default >since compat 10, which means that "--with

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA] (was: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging)

2018-02-03 Thread Juhani Numminen
Gabriel F. T. Gomes kirjoitti 03.02.2018 klo 01:41: > I have more updates to this RFS, which: > > - Fix most lintian warning (pedantic) [*]. > - Fix a new bug report (just mark it as fixed, really) [1]. > - Update debhelper version to 11. Quick note regarding debian/rules (which I only

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2018-02-02 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
I have more updates to this RFS, which: - Fix most lintian warning (pedantic) [*]. - Fix a new bug report (just mark it as fixed, really) [1]. - Update debhelper version to 11. The new commits are in the repository [2]. The new package is on mentors [3][4]. I'm still looking for a

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2018-01-02 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
The repository for the packaging of bash-completion is now hosted on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/ The latest commit is not on the master branch, but on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/commits/unstable Mentors has been updated with a new build:

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2018-01-02 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 02 Jan 2018, Andrew Shadura wrote: > >On 2 January 2018 at 02:17, Gabriel F. T. Gomes > wrote: >> >> When I created the repository in my own server, I named the >> repository bash-completion-debian.git. When I cloned it to >> salsa.debian.org, under my personal

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2018-01-02 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 2 January 2018 at 02:17, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 31 Dec 2017, Andrew Shadura wrote: > >>On 30 December 2017 at 15:08, Gabriel F. T. Gomes >> wrote: >>> >>> 2. Even though I read the discussions about salsa on debian-devel, I >>>

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2018-01-01 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 31 Dec 2017, Andrew Shadura wrote: >On 30 December 2017 at 15:08, Gabriel F. T. Gomes > wrote: >> >> 2. Even though I read the discussions about salsa on debian-devel, I >> still do not know how to name the repository. When browsing the >> projects under the Debian

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2017-12-30 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 30 Dec 2017, Ben Finney wrote: >"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" writes: > >> Not really. If I understood it correctly, anonscm.debian.org is >> alioth, which was being decomissioned when I started to work on >> this. > >The name ‘anonscm.debian.org’ was explicitly det up

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Vincent Blut
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:09:07PM -0200, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: On 29 Dec 2017, Vincent Blut wrote: With this release, you can close #847971 too. ;-) Oh, great! :) I added this information to the changelog so that the bug gets closed automatically (I also resubmitted to mentors).

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 29 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >>> On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> >>Yeah, that's right. I'm still using git.debian.org for my packages, >>but I

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 29 Dec 2017, Vincent Blut wrote: >With this release, you can close #847971 too. ;-) Oh, great! :) I added this information to the changelog so that the bug gets closed automatically (I also resubmitted to mentors). Thanks. pgpvgCnbJ0Prk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

2017-12-29 Thread Ben Finney
"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" writes: > Not really. If I understood it correctly, anonscm.debian.org is > alioth, which was being decomissioned when I started to work on this. The name ‘anonscm.debian.org’ was explicitly det up so that it could survive changes to a

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Vincent Blut
Hi Gabriel, On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:56:36PM -0200, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: On 29 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: Yeah, that's right. I'm still using git.debian.org for my

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 29 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >> On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> >Yeah, that's right. I'm still using git.debian.org for my packages, >but I should change that as well. I changed to the new server and fixed

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >>As promised, here's my review. > > Thank you! ^^ > >>The first thing I did was to "gbp >>clone" your repository and build it locally. After that, I ran: >> >> lintian -EI --pedantic

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-29 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >As promised, here's my review. Thank you! ^^ >The first thing I did was to "gbp >clone" your repository and build it locally. After that, I ran: > > lintian -EI --pedantic bash-completion_2.7-1_amd64.changes > >And noticed a few things worth

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-12-22 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, October 01 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bash-completion" > > * Package name: bash-completion >Version : 1:2.7-1 >Upstream Author : Bash

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-11-16 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Hi, Andreas, Does this new version correctly addresses your concerns about the missing NMUs? (And are there any other NMUs which I might have failed to find?) Thank you, Gabriel On 23 Oct 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >On 10 Oct 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > >>You seem to have missed

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-10-22 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 10 Oct 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >You seem to have missed to incorporate all the NMUs of >bash-completion... (atleast they where not part of the >debian/changelog) Is there any reason why you did not include those >changes? Won't your updated version conflict with packages who now >ships

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-10-14 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >You seem to have missed to incorporate all the NMUs of >bash-completion... (atleast they where not part of the >debian/changelog) Is there any reason why you did not include those >changes? No reason, other than sheer inexperience. :) I'll look

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-10-10 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Gabriel F. T. Gomes, On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:40:40PM -0300, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: [...] > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bash-completion" [...] > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x >

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

2017-10-01 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bash-completion" * Package name: bash-completion Version : 1:2.7-1 Upstream Author : Bash Completion Maintainers * URL :