Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:42:29AM +, Samuel Bronson a écrit : Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes: Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes: For the very next of my commits, 1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just just disregard the Lintian complain For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, since so far as I can tell there is no versioned URL currently available that takes you straight to the current text of the document. However, I may have missed something. Actually, there is http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/copyright- format.xml?revision=269view=markup. Not exactly the most readable, but it does work. Hello Samuel, I do not recommend to use this URL. The current draft will not have normative changes anymore, so you can use: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ The DEP is in a final review stage. Unless additional delays, I will probably mark it accepted next week, and the above URL will become valid immediately after the next Policy upload. I personally don't like to use URLs that aren't yet valid... makes it hard to look up what they are! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJYzjmdJttJ1bDOYQczYxZ_yy2cbMrqvyNxMaGExTrc+VzP=_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: I do not recommend to use this URL. The current draft will not have normative changes anymore, so you can use: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ The DEP is in a final review stage. Unless additional delays, I will probably mark it accepted next week, and the above URL will become valid immediately after the next Policy upload. I personally don't like to use URLs that aren't yet valid... makes it hard to look up what they are! The current plan is to release debian-policy with the 1.0 version of this document on February 22nd. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hayqobtq@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes: Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes: For the very next of my commits, 1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just just disregard the Lintian complain For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, since so far as I can tell there is no versioned URL currently available that takes you straight to the current text of the document. However, I may have missed something. Actually, there is http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/copyright- format.xml?revision=269view=markup. Not exactly the most readable, but it does work. Unfortunately, Lintian doesn't know that yet, and won't accept it. (I've probably messed up the To: and CC: fields due to sending through gmane; sorry for that, but I wasn't on the list yet when this was posted.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20120211t063616-...@post.gmane.org
Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:42:29AM +, Samuel Bronson a écrit : Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes: Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes: For the very next of my commits, 1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just just disregard the Lintian complain For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, since so far as I can tell there is no versioned URL currently available that takes you straight to the current text of the document. However, I may have missed something. Actually, there is http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/copyright- format.xml?revision=269view=markup. Not exactly the most readable, but it does work. Hello Samuel, I do not recommend to use this URL. The current draft will not have normative changes anymore, so you can use: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ The DEP is in a final review stage. Unless additional delays, I will probably mark it accepted next week, and the above URL will become valid immediately after the next Policy upload. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120211064552.gh19...@falafel.plessy.net
Fwd: Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
On 15.12.2011 00:16, Russ Allbery wrote: For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, All right, http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0 (cf. #640737) without trailing slash prevents any Lintian complain (2.5.3). Greetings, Daniel Stender -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eea2143.7080...@danielstender.com
Re: Fwd: Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:33 +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: On 15.12.2011 00:16, Russ Allbery wrote: For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, All right, http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0 (cf. #640737) without trailing slash prevents any Lintian complain (2.5.3). Well, yes, except that it's a URL which is not (yet) working. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1323973887.3951.28.camel@monk
Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains
Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com writes: For the very next of my commits, 1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just just disregard the Lintian complain For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, since so far as I can tell there is no versioned URL currently available that takes you straight to the current text of the document. However, I may have missed something. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwgmzqtw@windlord.stanford.edu
