Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/1.0.11-3 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/debian/1.0.11-3
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed to branch master at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
Commits:
51608116 by Stephane Glondu at 2023-07-20T14:57:27+02:00
Include ocamlvars.mk in debian/rules
- - - - -
2 changed files:
- debian/changelog
- debian/rules
Changes
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/1.0.11-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/debian/1.0.11-2
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/1.0.11-2 at Debian OCaml
Maintainers / ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/archive/debian/1.0.11-2
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/1.0.11-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/debian/1.0.11-1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag upstream/1.0.11 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/upstream/1.0.11
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/1.0.11-1 at Debian OCaml
Maintainers / ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/archive/debian/1.0.11-1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
ocaml-curses 1.0.10-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183,
CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192
https://bugs.debian.org
Stéphane Glondu pushed to branch upstream at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
Commits:
a262c72b by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:51+01:00
New upstream version 1.0.7
- - - - -
034703e5 by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:52+01:00
New upstream version 1.0.8
- - - - -
569088ab
Stéphane Glondu pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
Commits:
57ba7e4a by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:52+01:00
pristine-tar data for ocaml-curses_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
- - - - -
52d7ee87 by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:53+01:00
pristine-tar data
Stéphane Glondu pushed to branch master at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
Commits:
fa444381 by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:19+01:00
Update debian/watch
- - - - -
a262c72b by Stephane Glondu at 2021-11-28T09:44:51+01:00
New upstream version 1.0.7
- - - - -
034703e5
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/1.0.6-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/debian/1.0.6-2
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/1.0.6-2 at Debian OCaml
Maintainers / ocaml-curses
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-curses/-/tree/archive/debian/1.0.6-2
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #792957 [ocaml-curses] Correct spelling of ${shlibs:Depends}
Added tag(s) pending.
--
792957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ocaml-curses 1.0.3-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-08-29
It is affected by these RC bugs:
868599: ocaml-curses: ocaml-curses FTBFS with recent ncurses
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:49:58 +
with message-id <e1dxxzg-0006y3...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#868599: fixed in ocaml-curses 1.0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #868599,
regarding ocaml-curses FTBFS with recent ncurses
to be marked as done.
This means th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #868599 [src:ocaml-curses] ocaml-curses FTBFS with recent ncurses
Added tag(s) patch.
--
868599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2017-07-17 02:17 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: ocaml-curses
> Version: 1.0.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ocaml-curses.html
>
> ...
> checking for sy
Source: ocaml-curses
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ocaml-curses.html
...
checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes
checking windows.h usability... no
checking windows.h presence... no
checking for windows.h
FYI: The status of the ocaml-curses source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.2-3
Current version: 1.0.3-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ocaml-curses
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Nicolas George, Richard Jones
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/ocaml-tmk/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C / OCaml
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:13:52PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is great. Obviously I'm not a DD but if there's anything I can
do to help then let me know.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:47:31AM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
I can package ocaml-curses if you want on behalf of debian-ocaml-maint.
Debian packages are handled in our svn repository so I don't really need
to be added to the savannah project.
I'd like someone from Debian to be upstream so
Richard Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:47:31AM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
I can package ocaml-curses if you want on behalf of debian-ocaml-maint.
Debian packages are handled in our svn repository so I don't really need
to be added to the savannah project.
I'd like someone from
Sorry if I'm being a bit demanding :-) Does someone from the Debian
community want to be a co-maintainer of the ocaml-curses upstream
(ie. http://www.nongnu.org/ocaml-tmk/,
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/ocaml-tmk/)?
If you do, send me your Savannah username.
It's no secret that my
Hi,
I can package ocaml-curses if you want on behalf of debian-ocaml-maint.
Debian packages are handled in our svn repository so I don't really need
to be added to the savannah project.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Richard Jones wrote:
Sorry if I'm being a bit demanding :-) Does someone from the Debian
I am pleased to announce the first public release of OCaml Curses,
which is an OCaml binding to the curses/ncurses library.
This project was formerly called OCaml TMK, and all the actual work on
it was done by Nicolas George.
The project homepage is: http://www.nongnu.org/ocaml-tmk
Hi,
Richard Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:15:23PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On 07-08-2007, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:01:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
I've talked to
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:14:15AM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hi,
Richard Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:15:23PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On 07-08-2007, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:01:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug
Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding?
For Fedora I took the curses bindings from
http://www.nongnu.org/ocaml-tmk/ and have created a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969.
These curses bindings seem to be perfectly well-written and cover a
large
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding?
I did in the past, but gave up due to the lack of a reliable upstream.
I was aware of ocaml-tmk you are mentioning (which seems to be quite
dead ...) and of the curses
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:01:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding?
I did in the past, but gave up due to the lack of a reliable upstream.
I was aware of ocaml-tmk you
On 07-08-2007, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:01:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding?
I did in the past, but gave up due to the lack
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:15:23PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On 07-08-2007, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:01:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
Have Debian considered packaging a
I'm only really interested in the
curses stuff.
I am not interested in the tmk stuff, but i think it will be better to
split the current source in two : ocaml-curses and ocaml-tmk. It is just
a question of keeping some code that has already been written. Maybe,
someday someone will want to use
35 matches
Mail list logo
