Re: hevea licencing problems

Hello, On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:56:12AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Hi, > > Argh! > > Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL > which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the > events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I correct

Re: hevea licencing problems

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:56:12 +0100, Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Argh! > > Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL > which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the > events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I cor

Re: hevea licencing problems

Hi, Argh! Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I correct? Should this package be moved to non-free? Regards, Samuel. Package: hevea Version:

Processed: minor bugs, policy requirements is fulfiled

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 290204 minor Bug#290204: Improper copyright file Severity set to `minor'. > severity 290203 minor Bug#290203: Improper copyright file Severity set to `minor'. > severity 290202 minor Bug#290202: Improper copyright file Severity set to `minor'

警告！ウイルスチェックサービス

== (BVIRUS GUARD and CHECK SERVICE for E-Mail Powerd by SYMANTEC Scan Engine. (B $B$"$J$?$,Aw$C$?%a!<%k$K%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?!#(B $B8!CN$5$l$?%&[EMAIL PROTECTED];_$N0Y!"%a!<%k$r:o=|CW$7$^$7$?!#(B $B%a!<%k$rAw?.$7$h$&[

Bug#290174: Improper copyright file

Package: hevea Version: 1.07-4 Severity: normal The copyright file of this package seems to use the *license*, instead of the copyright holder in the style of "Copyright (C) 2005 by Justin Pryzby". Please see this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/03/msg02190.html -- System In