Processed: Fwd: Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 913641 1:6.1.3-1 Bug #913641 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:6.1.3-1. > severity 913461 wishlist Bug #913461 [src:libstrophe] libstrophe: please provide a package for stretch-backports Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' > severity 913641 grave Bug #913641 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > tag 913461 - moreinfo Bug #913461 [src:libstrophe] libstrophe: please provide a package for stretch-backports Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tag 913641 + moreinfo Bug #913641 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 913461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913461 913641: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#913641: libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:58:02PM +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > Am 13. November 2018 12:13:52 MEZ schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane > : >> Package: libreoffice-report-builder >> Version: 1:6.1.3-1 >> Severity: normal > Huh, what? On a stable? Seriousl Yes, I'm dogfooding more recent version of LibreOffice. Seriously, that's how one gets early testers and bug reports before release. >> Trying to run any report (a report builder one, not a legacy one) >> fails with error message: >> Can not activate the factory for >> org.libreoffice.report.pentaho.SOReportJobFactory$_SOReportJobFactory > I assume it's related to stables openjdk 8 update and the discussion > in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/63118. Hmmm... Switching LibreOffice to use OpenJDK 7 solves that issue. I guess this confirms your assumption? > Need to file a bug on openjdk... Not clear if you are saying I need to do it, or you need to do it. I don't quite understand the issue, you do, so I assume you will, you will be able to explain to the Java package maintainers the issue? Please CC me, I'd like to be educated on that. > >-- System Information: > >Debian Release: 9.6 > > APT prefers stable-updates > >APT policy: (600, 'stable-updates'), (600, 'stable'), (400, 'testing'), > >(300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > >Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > >Foreign Architectures: i386 > > [...] > >Versions of packages libreoffice-report-builder depends on: > >ii libbase-java 1.1.6-2 > >ii libcommons-logging-java1.2-1 > >ii libflute-java 1:1.1.6-3 > >ii libfonts-java 1.1.6.dfsg-3 > >ii libformula-java1.1.7.dfsg-2 > >ii liblayout-java 0.2.10-2 > >ii libloader-java 1.1.6.dfsg-4 > >ii libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java 0.9.4-4 > >ii libreoffice-common 1:6.1.3-1 > >ii libreoffice-core 1:6.1.3-1 > >ii libreoffice-java-common1:6.1.3-1 > >ii libreoffice-report-builder-bin 1:6.1.3-1 > >ii librepository-java 1.1.6-3 > >ii libsac-java1.3+dfsg-2 > >ii libserializer-java 1.1.6-4 > >ii libxml-java1.1.6.dfsg-3 > This honestly is Soo broken. Ok, the backport will have the same problem > (that's why I needed +2 there) but.. That's honestly not broken at all. That's why our packages have dependencies, so that they can have what they require. >> ii openjdk-8-jre [java6-runtime] 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1 > This is probably the cause What happens with the old openjdk 8 on > stretch or openjdk 11.0.1+13? Downgrading to 8u171-b11-2 makes this problem disappear.
Bug#913641: libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run
Package: libreoffice-report-builder Version: 1:6.1.3-1 Severity: normal Trying to run any report (a report builder one, not a legacy one) fails with error message: Can not activate the factory for org.libreoffice.report.pentaho.SOReportJobFactory$_SOReportJobFactory Nothing particular on stderr. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (600, 'stable-updates'), (600, 'stable'), (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libreoffice-report-builder depends on: ii libbase-java 1.1.6-2 ii libcommons-logging-java1.2-1 ii libflute-java 1:1.1.6-3 ii libfonts-java 1.1.6.dfsg-3 ii libformula-java1.1.7.dfsg-2 ii liblayout-java 0.2.10-2 ii libloader-java 1.1.6.dfsg-4 ii libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java 0.9.4-4 ii libreoffice-common 1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-core 1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-java-common1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-report-builder-bin 1:6.1.3-1 ii librepository-java 1.1.6-3 ii libsac-java1.3+dfsg-2 ii libserializer-java 1.1.6-4 ii libxml-java1.1.6.dfsg-3 libreoffice-report-builder recommends no packages. libreoffice-report-builder suggests no packages. Versions of packages libreoffice-base depends on: ii libc6 2.27-8 ii libgcc1 1:8.2.0-9 ii libreoffice-base-core 1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-base-drivers 1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-core 1:6.1.3-1 ii libstdc++68.2.0-9 ii uno-libs3 6.1.3-1 ii ure 6.1.3-1 Versions of packages libreoffice-base recommends: ii default-jre [java6-runtime]2:1.8-58 ii libreoffice-java-common1:6.1.3-1 ii libreoffice-writer 1:6.1.3-1 ii openjdk-7-jre [java6-runtime] 7u151-2.6.11-3 ii openjdk-8-jre [java6-runtime] 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1 Versions of packages libreoffice-base suggests: ii unixodbc 2.3.4-1 -- no debconf information
Bug#913641: libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run
notfound 913641 1:6.1.3-1 found 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4 severity 913641 grave tag 913641 + moreinfo thanks Am 13. November 2018 12:13:52 MEZ schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane : >Package: libreoffice-report-builder >Version: 1:6.1.3-1 >Severity: normal Huh, what? On a stable? Seriousl >Trying to run any report (a report builder one, not a legacy one) >fails with error message: > >Can not activate the factory for >org.libreoffice.report.pentaho.SOReportJobFactory$_SOReportJobFactory > >Nothing particular on stderr. I assume it's related to stables openjdk 8 update and the discussion in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/63118. Doesn't affect sid or buster with jdk 11 (which is default there.. ) Need to file a bug on openjdk... >-- System Information: >Debian Release: 9.6 > APT prefers stable-updates >APT policy: (600, 'stable-updates'), (600, 'stable'), (400, 'testing'), >(300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') >Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) >Foreign Architectures: i386 > [...] >Versions of packages libreoffice-report-builder depends on: >ii libbase-java 1.1.6-2 >ii libcommons-logging-java1.2-1 >ii libflute-java 1:1.1.6-3 >ii libfonts-java 1.1.6.dfsg-3 >ii libformula-java1.1.7.dfsg-2 >ii liblayout-java 0.2.10-2 >ii libloader-java 1.1.6.dfsg-4 >ii libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java 0.9.4-4 >ii libreoffice-common 1:6.1.3-1 >ii libreoffice-core 1:6.1.3-1 >ii libreoffice-java-common1:6.1.3-1 >ii libreoffice-report-builder-bin 1:6.1.3-1 >ii librepository-java 1.1.6-3 >ii libsac-java1.3+dfsg-2 >ii libserializer-java 1.1.6-4 >ii libxml-java1.1.6.dfsg-3 This honestly is Soo broken. Ok, the backport will have the same problem (that's why I needed +2 there) but.. >ii openjdk-8-jre [java6-runtime] 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1 This is probably the cause What happens with the old openjdk 8 on stretch or openjdk 11.0.1+13? Regards Rene -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 913641 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4 Bug #913641 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 913641: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#913641: libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run
tag 913641 - moreinfo retitle 913641 libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run after S8195874 in OpenJDK thanks Am 13. November 2018 13:13:09 MEZ schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane : >On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:58:02PM +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org >wrote: >> Am 13. November 2018 12:13:52 MEZ schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane >: >>> Package: libreoffice-report-builder >>> Version: 1:6.1.3-1 >>> Severity: normal > >> Huh, what? On a stable? Seriousl > >Yes, I'm dogfooding more recent version of LibreOffice. Seriously, >that's how one gets early testers and bug reports before release. Use testing or sid. Or use the backport. Installing sid packages per se on stable is broken. >>> Trying to run any report (a report builder one, not a legacy one) >>> fails with error message: > >>> Can not activate the factory for >>> >org.libreoffice.report.pentaho.SOReportJobFactory$_SOReportJobFactory > >> I assume it's related to stables openjdk 8 update and the discussion >> in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/63118. > >Hmmm... Switching LibreOffice to use OpenJDK 7 solves that issue. I >guess this confirms your assumption? Yes. >> Need to file a bug on openjdk... > >Not clear if you are saying I need to do it, or you need to do it. I >don't quite understand the issue, you do, so I assume you will, you >will be able to explain to the Java package maintainers the issue? I will do, yes. >Please CC me, I'd like to be educated on that. The Gerrit discussion explains it..openjdk doesn't honour some classpath specifications anymore so stuff is simply not found. >>> ii openjdk-8-jre [java6-runtime] 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1 > >> This is probably the cause What happens with the old openjdk 8 on >> stretch or openjdk 11.0.1+13? > >Downgrading to 8u171-b11-2 makes this problem disappear. Ok, that also confirms it... Regards, René -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Bug#913641: libreoffice-report-builder: report builder reports fail to run
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:13:09 +0100 Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Downgrading to 8u171-b11-2 makes this problem disappear. Except 8u171-b11-2 (and all 8u171 builds) was removed from the pool for stretch today. > That's honestly not broken at all. That's why our packages have dependencies, so that they can have what they require. It is very broken that stretch doesn't have any working Java package in apt repos (except in openjdk-11 in stretch-backports). I realize this isn't a libreoffice package issue, but it seems like #911925 is being ignored. Thanks, Anton -- This email and any attachments may contain information that is subject to copyright, that constitutes trade secrets, or that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate any part of this email or any attachments. We do not waive any legal protections due to misdirection. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. Any views expressed are those of the author and may not reflect those of the company. Emails are not perfectly secure and we do not warrant ours to be free of errors, viruses or other defects. By communicating with us by email, you accept these risks.
Bug#913702: libwpd: CVE-2018-19208
Source: libwpd Version: 0.10.2-2 Severity: important Tags: upstream security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for libwpd. CVE-2018-19208[0]: | In libwpd 0.10.2, there is a NULL pointer dereference in the function | WP6ContentListener::defineTable in WP6ContentListener.cpp that will | lead to a denial of service attack. This is related to WPXTable.h. I do not know if it was reported to upstream or only in Red Hat bugzilla. ==25333== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==25333== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==25333== Using Valgrind-3.13.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==25333== Command: wpd2html ./poc0-1 ==25333== ==25333== Invalid read of size 8 ==25333==at 0x488C37A: operator[] (WPXTable.h:89) ==25333==by 0x488C37A: WP6ContentListener::defineTable(unsigned char, unsigned short) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1314) ==25333==by 0x4893899: WP6Parser::parseDocument(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:149) ==25333==by 0x488D8DA: WP6ContentListener::_handleSubDocument(WPXSubDocument const*, WPXSubDocumentType, WPXTableList, unsigned int) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1783) ==25333==by 0x489B90E: WPXContentListener::handleSubDocument(WPXSubDocument const*, WPXSubDocumentType, WPXTableList, unsigned int) (WPXContentListener.cpp:1226) ==25333==by 0x489C122: WPXContentListener::_openPageSpan() (WPXContentListener.cpp:415) ==25333==by 0x489C854: WPXContentListener::_openSection() (WPXContentListener.cpp:198) ==25333==by 0x488EF15: WP6ContentListener::_handleListChange(unsigned short) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1888) ==25333==by 0x489CFC1: WPXContentListener::_openSpan() (WPXContentListener.cpp:797) ==25333==by 0x488B903: WP6ContentListener::insertCharacter(unsigned int) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:423) ==25333==by 0x48938BF: WP6Parser::parseDocument(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:138) ==25333==by 0x4893922: WP6Parser::parse(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:83) ==25333==by 0x4893D58: WP6Parser::parse(librevenge::RVNGTextInterface*) (WP6Parser.cpp:225) ==25333== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==25333== ==25333== ==25333== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==25333== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0 ==25333==at 0x488C37A: operator[] (WPXTable.h:89) ==25333==by 0x488C37A: WP6ContentListener::defineTable(unsigned char, unsigned short) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1314) ==25333==by 0x4893899: WP6Parser::parseDocument(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:149) ==25333==by 0x488D8DA: WP6ContentListener::_handleSubDocument(WPXSubDocument const*, WPXSubDocumentType, WPXTableList, unsigned int) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1783) ==25333==by 0x489B90E: WPXContentListener::handleSubDocument(WPXSubDocument const*, WPXSubDocumentType, WPXTableList, unsigned int) (WPXContentListener.cpp:1226) ==25333==by 0x489C122: WPXContentListener::_openPageSpan() (WPXContentListener.cpp:415) ==25333==by 0x489C854: WPXContentListener::_openSection() (WPXContentListener.cpp:198) ==25333==by 0x488EF15: WP6ContentListener::_handleListChange(unsigned short) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:1888) ==25333==by 0x489CFC1: WPXContentListener::_openSpan() (WPXContentListener.cpp:797) ==25333==by 0x488B903: WP6ContentListener::insertCharacter(unsigned int) (WP6ContentListener.cpp:423) ==25333==by 0x48938BF: WP6Parser::parseDocument(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:138) ==25333==by 0x4893922: WP6Parser::parse(librevenge::RVNGInputStream*, WPXEncryption*, WP6Listener*) (WP6Parser.cpp:83) ==25333==by 0x4893D58: WP6Parser::parse(librevenge::RVNGTextInterface*) (WP6Parser.cpp:225) ==25333== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack ==25333== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but ==25333== possible), you can try to increase the size of the ==25333== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. ==25333== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608. ==25333== ==25333== HEAP SUMMARY: ==25333== in use at exit: 39,843 bytes in 1,012 blocks ==25333== total heap usage: 9,446 allocs, 8,434 frees, 879,851 bytes allocated ==25333== ==25333== LEAK SUMMARY: ==25333==definitely lost: 40 bytes in 1 blocks ==25333==indirectly lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks ==25333== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==25333==still reachable: 39,787 bytes in 1,010 blocks ==25333== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==25333== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory ==25333== ==25333== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v ==25333== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) Segmentation fault If you fix the vulnerability please
Let's take another look...!!
Hello debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org, I Hope you are doing well. I am Marina Cook and I am contacting you to find out, if you have need for IT Website or mobile application development services. We are fast Growing Website Services Company and having an in-house software design and development team, which has expertise in the following areas:- * Website Design (E-commerce, Personal, Corporate, Responsive) * Mobile Application (iPhone Apps, Android, iOS, Web Services) * Digital Marketing (SEO, SMO, SEM, PPC) I have very competitive rates for the above services, and should you feel interested, I can send you more details regarding this in my next email. Please let me know if you are interested. Thanks Marina Cook Business Development Executive
