revno: 1540
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Thu 2009-05-14 14:38:12 +0200
message:
HSQLDB_MINVER= (>> 1.8.0.9) for lenny, thanks Tim Retout
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file 'chang
revno: 1541
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Thu 2009-05-14 19:05:37 +0200
message:
update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-14 12:38:12 +
tag 528727 + pending
thanks
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
Indeed. JAVA_HOME is /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk but the package build-deps
against java-gcj-compat...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://
severity 528795 serious
forcemerge 527910 528795
thanks
Dale Stephens wrote:
> My system is mostly Lenny with some Sid (glibc, Openoffice.org plus a few
> other things).
Why oh wy are you breaking lenny in that way and not using backports? Which
does have OOo 3.0.1.
> When OpenOffice.org (OOo)
Hi,
Dale Stephens wrote:
> > You should have looked at the BTS; this was already reported as #527910
> > and a fix is in the works.
> > (The correct fix sounds easy, but is not that easy as it wounds, but it
> > just needs some minor things now)
> >
>
> I saw that bug, but did not connect _that_
retitle 528836 openoffice.org-writer: latest OOo loads docs with tables bad
forwarded 528836 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102004
thanks
Hi,
alex bodnaru wrote:
> i have a doc file that has been loaded well in OOo 3.0, but doesn't load ok
> with current OOo 3.1.
> abiwird load
Hi,
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> >> While converting a ppt file to PDF OpenOffice gives a segmentation fault
> >> here.
> >> gdb output is attached.
> >
&g
forwarded 527954 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102007
retitle 527954 Segmentation fault while converting ppt "lossless" to PDF
tag 527954 + unreproducible
tag 527954 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Rene Eng
revno: 1552
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Mon 2009-05-18 09:39:45 +0200
message:
update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-18 07:07:31 +
revno: 1554
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Mon 2009-05-18 23:50:39 +0200
message:
remove oobsolete conflicts
modified:
control
control.in
=== modified file 'control'
--- a/control 2009-05-1
Hi,
Jan Beyer wrote:
> enable this, users need to go through a couple of tedious steps:
> * configure OOo to allow untrusted macro execution
> * open some specific file
> (/usr/share/bibus/Setup/UnoConnectionListener.odg), accept the warning, that
> it contains macros
> * run the contained macro t
Hi,
Bernard Gray wrote:
> on the desktops in my workplace.
> In order to handle the live environment, I need to change some of the
> OOo registry keys to affect default save/backup locations etc [1].
> In the past I have just used a fairly blunt force 'dump working
> profile in new users dir' appr
revno: 1555
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Tue 2009-05-19 10:04:30 +0200
message:
-2 released
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-18 12:28:44 +
+++ b
tag 529518 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Javier Andrés Galaz Jeria wrote:
> On my box i've just created the dir /var/lib/openoffice/share and it
> worked. I think it's because /var/lib/openoffice/share didn't exist
> before the installation, not because of the command issued.
Well, yes, but it tries to cr
tag 529519 + unreproducible
tag 529519 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> Setting up openoffice.org-evolution (1:3.1.0-2) ...
>
> ERROR: create ServiceManager failed!
>
> ER
tag 529521 + moreinfo
tag 529521 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> Setting up openoffice.org-presentation-minimizer (1.0+OOo3.1.0-2) ...
>
> Adding extension
> /usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/sun-presentation-minimizer
revno: 1556
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 02:12:26 +0200
message:
mkdir -p, oops
modified:
changelog
openoffice.org-common.preinst.in
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changel
revno: 1557
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 02:13:41 +0200
message:
add explicit gcj builddep
modified:
changelog
control
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 200
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
reassign 529430 openoffice.org-calc
forwarded 529430 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505486
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
[ handling both 529519 and 529521 in this reply. When replying for
stuff specific to one of those bugs remove the not-matching CC and please
keep answers for those bugs separate unless they are for both (this is
it's a log of an upgrade which shows both problems ]
[ please always keep the bugs in
revno: 1558
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 10:06:56 +0200
message:
update ooo-build, check for existence of rdb bevore regview
modified:
changelog
shell-lib.sh
=== modified file
[ dropping -devel, including other extension maintainers ]
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> - please copy the maintainer scripts from already existing extensions.
> Especially the flush_unopkg (by running a list after it was *scheduled*
> to be removed by remove) is important
> Thi
revno: 1559
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 11:52:41 +0200
message:
release -3
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-20 08:06:56 +
+++ b/chan
revno: 1560
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 11:22:21 +0200
message:
+ * debian/rules:
+- use gcj-jdk instead of java-gcj-compat-dev (closes: #526292)
+ * debian/control.in
tag 529519 - unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> Setting up openoffice.org-evolution (1:3.1.0-2) ...
>
> ERROR: create ServiceManager failed!
>
> ERROR description: Could
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > https://eurynome.mirbsd.org/debs/dists/hardy/wtf/pkgs/openoffice-ext/openoffice.org-altsearch_1.2.2-1~wtf804+1.dsc
> >
> > This is what we’ll use at work¹ for now; the final version will
> > of course target sid.
revno: 1561
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-20 15:15:44 +0200
message:
regen control
modified:
control
=== modified file 'control'
--- a/control 2009-05-20 09:22:21 +
+++ b/cont
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# no 2.3.1-5 in the tree, assume that ehen its fixed in -5 its also in -3
close 409020 1:2.3.1-3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Hi,
Rail Aliev wrote:
> > Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > - please copy the maintainer scripts from already existing extensions.
> > > Especially the flush_unopkg (by running a list after it was *scheduled*
> > > to be removed by remove) is important
> > &
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >- please copy the maintainer scripts from already existing extensions.
>
> There are any? I failed to find them – but maybe I just didn’t
> have the right search terms for the 23+k packages…
openoffice.org-writer2latex
openoffice.org-writer2xhtml
openoffice.org-voik
severity 529620 serious
close 529620 1:3.1.0-3
merge 529440 529518 529620
thanks
Hi,
Alexey Salmin wrote:
> (Reading database ... 347270 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace openoffice.org-common 1:3.1.0-1 (using
> .../openoffice.org-common_1%3a3.1.0-2_all.deb) ...
Hi,
Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> Doing a dpkg --contents on the downloaded package shows however that
> /var/lib/openoffice/share is present in it:
True and intended.
> So it just needs to be created during the install or move
> javasettingsunopkginstall.xml to /var/lib/openoffice (as in version
notfound 529637 1:3.0.1-11
severity 529637 serious
found 529637 1:3.1.0-2
close 529637 1:3.1.0-3
merge 529440 529518 529620 529637
thanks
Mike Hommey wrote:
> This is the error message I get when upgrading:
>
> Preparing to replace openoffice.org-common 1:3.0.1-11 (using
> .../openoffice.org-com
revno: 1562
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 08:29:20 +0200
message:
typo (thanks Rail Aliev)
modified:
rules
=== modified file 'rules'
--- a/rules 2009-05-20 09:22:21 +
+
Hi,
Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> I'm having trouble opening a HSQL-DB (created with OOo 3.0) in OOo 3.1
> The error message goes like this:
> The connection to the data source "Buch-Datenbank" could not be established.
> SQL Status: HY000
> The connection to the external data source could not be esta
[ what if you would format your mails sanely so that it's possible
to sanely cite it. As usual, line break after 72 chars.. ]
Hi,
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I figured after much time that Debian's OOo is actually Go-oo, or something
> like that. I then realized that Go-oo was mentioned in the co
revno: 1563
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 13:19:20 +0200
message:
update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-22 10:25:31 +
revno: 1564
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 14:01:30 +0200
message:
merge
modified:
control
rules
revno: 1560.1.1
revno: 1561
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 12:18:39 +0200
message:
* debian/openoffice.org-common.preinst.in, debian/rules:
- again move javasettingsunopkginstall.xml to
/var
revno: 1562
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 12:25:31 +0200
message:
add | java5-runtime | jre to JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS (closes: #509690)
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file
Hi,
Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> OO installed flawlessly with today's update.
>
> Log output:
this log [1] shows it working for both of your failures.
Do you mind if we closed those two bugs for now (we can reopen them later
anyway if we find out whether somthing not yet fixed/what causes it)?
found 529951 1:2.4.1-6
close 529951 1:3.0.0~beta2-1
notfixed 529951 1:2.4.1-7
thanks
Hi,
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> The CUPS package transitioned its naming scheme from CUPSYS to CUPS starting
> with
> Lenny. While reviewing remaining rdepends against cupsys* still present in
> Squeeze,
> we f
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > The CUPS package transitioned its naming scheme from CUPSYS to CUPS
> > starting with
> > Lenny. While reviewing remaining rdepends against cupsys* still pr
revno: 1565
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 19:53:44 +0200
message:
regen control
modified:
control
=== modified file 'control'
--- a/control 2009-05-20 13:15:44 +
+++ b/cont
revno: 1566
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 19:55:02 +0200
message:
use /usr/lib/gcc/aotcompile.py; update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a
revno: 1567
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-22 20:25:30 +0200
message:
also add gcj-jre to JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS
modified:
rules
=== modified file 'rules'
--- a/rules 2009-05-2
revno: 1568
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sat 2009-05-23 13:45:07 +0200
message:
add missing /
modified:
openoffice.org-common.preinst.in
=== modified file 'openoffice.org-common.preinst.in&#
revno: 1569
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sat 2009-05-23 13:49:27 +0200
message:
fix libebook dependency
modified:
changelog
control
control.in
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog
revno: 1570
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sat 2009-05-23 14:07:55 +0200
message:
use /@OOBASISDIR
modified:
openoffice.org-common.preinst.in
=== modified file 'openoffice.org-common.preinst.in&#
Hi,
Rail Aliev wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2009 14:15:51 Rail Aliev wrote:
> > Rene, all.
> >
> > Maybe I'm wrong but seems like instead of using $OOBASISDIR in
> > debian/openoffice.org-common.preinst.in you should use /@OOBASISDIR.
>
> /@OOBASISDIR@ I mean.
Yes, thanks. This of course never wo
Hi Frank.
Mechtilde wrote:
> Frank Zimmermann schrieb:
> > Rene Engelhard schrieb:
>
> >>> I'm running sid with the following:
> >>> aptitude search openoffice | grep ^i
> >> ooc, which arch?
> >
> > i386
>
> this seems to b
revno: 1571
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Sat 2009-05-23 23:06:50 +0200
message:
fix mv
modified:
openoffice.org-common.preinst.in
=== modified file 'openoffice.org-common.preinst.in&#
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I have just uploaded ICU 4.2 in experimental. As is generally the
> case, this release of ICU is expected to be source-compatible with
> earlier versions, including 4.0 which is currently in unstable. It
> will have to clear NEW, but once it does, you may wish to test
revno: 1572
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Mon 2009-05-25 17:31:58 +0200
message:
-4 released.
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-23 11:49:27 +
+++ b
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > I have just uploaded ICU 4.2 in experimental. As is generally the
> > case, this release of ICU is expected to be source-compatible with
> > earlier versions, including 4.0 which is currently in unstable. It
> >
revno: 1573
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Tue 2009-05-26 17:09:57 +0200
message:
update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-25 15:31:58 +
tag 530694 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-wiki-publisher
> Version: 1.0+OOo3.1.0-4
> Severity: normal
>
>
> openoffice.org-wiki-publisher stays in a perpetual wait state during
> postinstall process and requires a control-c command to allow for the re
retitle 342628 Can't resize window under twm or xfwm4 without openoffice.org-gtk
thanks
Hi,
Andrew Buckeridge wrote:
> openoffice.org-gtk does not fix the resize issue in twm.
of course not. -gtk does not have an effect itself on non-GNOME (Xfce
is an exception because it somehow matches GNOME :
severity 530694 important
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote:
> > Package: openoffice.org-wiki-publisher
> > Version: 1.0+OOo3.1.0-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > openoffice.org-wiki-publisher stays in a perpetual wait st
tag 530943 + moreinfo
tag 530943 + unreproducible
thanks
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Just after having upgraded openoffice.org to 1:3.1.0-4, I can't run it
> anymore. More specifically, if I call it (both from shell or from menu,
> using "soffice" or "oowriter" or "oo") it shows the blue
> splash
revno: 1574
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-29 09:47:39 +0200
message:
update ooo-build
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-26 15:09:57 +
Hi,
Andrew Buckeridge wrote:
> > Andrew Buckeridge wrote:
> > > openoffice.org-gtk does not fix the resize issue in twm.
> >
> > of course not. -gtk does not have an effect itself on non-GNOME (Xfce
> > is an exception because it somehow matches GNOME :) ) DEs/WMs.
> >
> > When you want Gtk UI e
revno: 1575
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-29 11:41:54 +0200
message:
ooo-build 3.1.0.6 release
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-05-29 07:4
severity 531118 wishlist
tag 531118 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Your package depends on the Boost 1.37 development packages, which
> will make it fail to build when 1.37 is removed. Please depend on the
> unversioned Boost development packages [1].
And cause FTBFSes when a ne
Hi,
Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
> When I try to install the latest version of
> openoffice.org-report-builder, the installation hangs:
>
> Selecting previously deselected package openoffice.org-report-builder.
> (Reading database ... 361775 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking op
severity 531210 wishlist
merge 478130 531210
thanks
Hi,
Soren Stoutner wrote:
> In amd64 with up-to-date testing, when a document is saved the save icon in
> the toolbar is not ghosted out. Ghosting
> the icon is the default behavior in Windows builds. This may be a problem
> with the amd64
Hi,
Ed Naumann wrote:
> Haven't the foggiest notion how to report a bug [...]
Besides that it's easy if you looked at the available docs and/or
followed the (oh, there's a tool named reportbug!) steps...
> BUT Linux Lenny OO Calc V3 can't open or save .dbf files.
.. why should OOo *Calc* open
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Or even worse, it builds but breaks (last occurance: shapes in Impress)
That said, the support is there since some versions, but unless I am convinced
stuff like the Impress thing won't happen again
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425
revno: 1576
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Tue 2009-06-02 14:30:06 +0200
message:
disable mono bindings on sparc
modified:
changelog
control
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changel
Ed Naumann wrote:
> The .bf file format is basically a spreadsheet. Linux U Calv V2.4 (and
Created by what?
> earlier) and all Windows versions of U Calv (including V3) have all had
wtf is U Calv?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://
Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> El 01/06/2009 a las 18:10 escribiste:
> > Haven't the foggiest notion how to report a bug BUT Linux Lenny OO Calc
> > V3 can't open or save .dbf files.
>
> Please report a bug to the BTS.
No, please not until this thread brings something. Or he provides
more info (arc
forwarded 531562 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102449
thanks
Hi,
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> I find it misleading that I don't get informed whenever a font is
> substituted e.g. in a Writer document. Don't get me wrong, I believe
> font substitution is a valuable feature and
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> You are quite right, this is a wishlist level bug.
>
> Thanks for letting me know that openoffice.org requires Boost 1.37.
Well, actually I didn't try 1.38 yet :) I changed to 1.37 after 1.34/1.35
were supposed to go away and stayed there
But I remember bad times on b
revno: 1577
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-06-03 16:37:24 +0200
message:
switch to default boost (thumbs crossed, 1.38 seems to work, though)
modified:
changelog
control
rules
=== modified
tag 531118 - wontfix
tag 531118 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Well, actually I didn't try 1.38 yet :) I changed to 1.37 after 1.34/1.35
> were supposed to go away and stayed there
OK, it *SEEMS* that it works. I changed the version for the next
upload to default *thu
tag 531750 + moreinfo
tag 531750 + unreproducible
thanks
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> After upgrading the system, so ooffice has been upgraded from 2.4 to 3.0,
How did you upgrade? What did you upgrade? In what distro? Which packages
of OOo did you have installed *when the bug occured*? "Of course"
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> it's just the usual boring i386 arch, Debian GNU/Linux system working
> great for years with a normal Debian testing mixed with some bits from
> unstable... don't ask me which ones because apt did the job, but I'd
> see if you need it.
And who says that is a sensible thi
revno: 1578
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Thu 2009-06-04 22:16:32 +0200
message:
remove mono-jit B-D
modified:
changelog
control
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-0
revno: 1579
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Thu 2009-06-04 22:17:53 +0200
message:
typo
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-06-04 20:16:32 +
+++ b/changel
forwarded 531920 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102517
thanks
Hi,
Alexander Galanin wrote:
> Actions:
>
> 1. Launch openoffice.org application and create new sheet in Calc.
> 2. Enter =now() function into cell and see for result
>
> Expected results:
>
> Date disp
revno: 1580
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-06-05 09:38:17 +0200
message:
revert r1576, makes no sense regarding testing migration: OOo would wait
behind mono for the other archs anyway, and mono
forwarded 531930 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102518
thanks
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Such 1024x600 screens are standard on pretty much all netbooks, so
> this is not a rare use case.
Oh yeah, Netbooks.
Forwarded it upstream.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard --
Hi,
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le May 22, 2009 06:54:11 am Rene Engelhard, vous avez écrit :
> > [ what if you would format your mails sanely so that it's possible
> > to sanely cite it. As usual, line break after 72 chars.. ]
> I'd like to know what's insane abo
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Such 1024x600 screens are standard on pretty much all netbooks, so
> > this is not a rare use case.
>
> Oh yeah, Netbooks.
> Forwarded it upstream.
To be honest I am *not* surprised about upstreams reaction:
-- snip
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
forwarded 531550 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
forwarded 414555 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
reassign 531550 openoffice.org
merge 414555 531550
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
forwarded 531550 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
forwarded 414555 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
thanks
Hi,
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Printing duplex on a printer without automatic duplex is a nightmare if
> one wants to print from writer.
Yes.
> The
Hi,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Also in the case of OOo's recovery dialog, the dialog can trivially be
> made smaller (it has a lot of empty space to list more files to recover,
> but in my experience I have rarely if ever more than 2 files to recover).
Yes, that's what I also said in
http://www.open
Hi,
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> I've more info. The problem is that there should be a link named
> "basis-link" in /usr/lib/openoffice, but in my system there is one
> directory with that name. After purging openoffice.org, this directory
You have a *directory* as basis-link?
That explains why it
revno: 1581
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Fri 2009-06-05 13:20:58 +0200
message:
move libbf_migratefilter to -core, referenced in services.rdb (in contrast to
the other libbf_)
modified:
control.in
revno: 1582
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Mon 2009-06-08 00:46:16 +0200
message:
don't rely on basis-link *and* javasettingsunopkginstall.xml symlinks
modified:
changelog
shell-lib.sh
=== modified
revno: 1583
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Mon 2009-06-08 09:11:50 +0200
message:
try to recover from /usr/lib/openoffice/basis-link being a dir...
modified:
openoffice.org-common.preinst.in
=== modified
severity 529430 important
merge 529430 532272
thanks
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Sorting a set of columns, some of which are static data, and some
> of which are formulas based upon the static data in corresponding
> rows, does not adjust the cell values of the formula columns.
Sounds like #529430.
Hi,
Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Rene Engelhard kirjoitti:
> > But what I do like is the "missing" preinst and doing the unregistering
> > in prerm. Saves us pre-dependencies...
> >
> > AFAIK all extensions so far do it in preinst. I have no idea anymore,
> >
revno: 1584
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-06-10 09:32:34 +0200
message:
add needed Pre-Depends:
modified:
changelog
control.in
control.mediawiki.in
control.minimizer.in
revno: 1585
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-06-10 11:35:23 +0200
message:
bump LPSOLVE_MIN_VERSION and SUITESPARSE_MIN_VERSION for suitesparse 3.4.0
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file
severity 532549 minor
tag 532549 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Here's my situation.
> Somebody sends me a .pps file, so I
> # aptitude install openoffice.org-impress
That of course neither installs -java-common nor a JDK because
it's not strictly needed.
> $ ooimpress
> jav
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> -java-common is only needed when you really need Java functionality.
> So *of course* it is no dependency on impress.
And of course -java-common does not depend on any JVM itself either.
The Java policy says that libraries (and -java-common is nothing else,
i
revno: 1586
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Wed 2009-06-10 22:44:07 +0200
message:
regen control
modified:
changelog
control
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-06-10 09:35:23 +
revno: 1587
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Thu 2009-06-11 01:25:47 +0200
message:
missing ,
modified:
control
control.in
=== modified file 'control'
--- a/control 2009-06-10 20:44:07 +
revno: 1588
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-06-11 12:31:33 +0200
message:
fix quote
modified:
shell-lib.sh
=== modified file 'shell-lib.sh'
--- a/shell-lib.sh 2009-06-07 22:46:16 +
601 - 700 of 13562 matches
Mail list logo
