On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:35:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Not really, I do not want to use README.source or something like this.
> I have a *personal* policy: I will not sponsor any package if there is
> no code I could run that recreates the source tarball. May be I'm to
> strict and the
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, Jul 03 2018, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would love to create a new bug report but this would rather be:
>
>Provide get-orig-source target if (and only if) uscan would fail.
>
> The previous discussion seem to show a tendency that this bug will be
> at best tagged wontfix
dgit rpush ought to work fairly well for the stuations where debrsign
might be used, and does not have this ssh trust reversal problem.
(It still operates rather as a signing oracle but the signing oracle
is much more restricted.)
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:39:27 +0200
with message-id <990d30db-2567-27d6-8e3c-9c3c7495b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify
retirement to debian-private
has caused the Debian Bug report #774384,
regarding
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # see https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference
> tag 834070 pending
Bug #834070 [developers-reference] developers-reference: include link to
Riseup's "OpenPGP Best Practices"
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 888978 pending
Bug #888978
Control: tag -1 - patch
On 02/16/2017 07:44 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.18
> Severity: normal
> Control: tags -1 patch
> Control: affects -1 devscripts
>
This bug doesn't seem to actually include a patch.
Cheers,
Julien
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - patch
Bug #855320 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Please do not
recommend debrsign
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
855320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855320
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> unblock 834607 by 567033
Bug #834607 [lintian] lintian: /usr/lib/ vs /usr/libexec
834607 was blocked by: 787816 567033
834607 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 834607: 567033
--
834607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834607
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:49:10 +0100
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.5.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors
Changed-By: Sean Whitton
debian-policy_4.1.5.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_4.1.5.0.dsc
debian-policy_4.1.5.0.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891216: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #891216,
regarding Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#880920: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #880920,
regarding Document Rules-Requires-Root field
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#787816: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #787816,
regarding Replace FHS 2.3 by FHS 3.0 in the Policy.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#864615: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #864615,
regarding please update version of posix standard for scripts (section 10.4)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901160: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #901160,
regarding Updating the description of the Standards-Version field
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 07/03/2018 11:56 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
>
> Complete patch series (including non-normative) updated here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/smcv/policy/merge_requests/1/diffs
> Seconded.
Cheers,
Julien
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was
spwhit...@spwhitton.name).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 03 2018, Simon McVittie wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
Seconded:
>>From 5205d0a50465cf422f1040d9395d5ea83dbfde5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Simon McVittie
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:43:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Update to FHS v3.0
>
> Notable changes
18 matches
Mail list logo
