On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:59:21PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I've created a PR for devref -
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/-/merge_requests/41
fwiw, merged into developers-reference 12.16 in sid.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:59:21PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:15:42PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri 03 Feb 2023 at 05:24PM GMT, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >
> > > Package: debian-policy
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > Policy currently
Hello,
On Mon 20 Feb 2023 at 01:59PM GMT, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Are you saying that it doesn't belong in policy because it'd be a
> recommendation rather than a must/should (at this point?), or because it's
> more about the
> workflow inside of Debian than package contents?
Thanks for
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:15:42PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 03 Feb 2023 at 05:24PM GMT, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops to
> > endorse a particular
Hello,
On Fri 03 Feb 2023 at 05:24PM GMT, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops to
> endorse a particular Vcs.
>
> At this point, it seems uncontroversial to encourage use of Vcs-Git
>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:57:21PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Sorry, to be clear I also meant encouraging the use of Git as a Vcs - rather
> than just
> of the Vcs-Git header.
The Policy is a wrong place for this (and the part about Vcs-* headers is
indeed a wrong place for this too).
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:57:21PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:48:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > Package: debian-policy
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > Policy currently describes
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:48:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops to
> > endorse a particular Vcs.
>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:43:06PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le ven. 3 févr. 2023 à 18:27, Jelmer Vernooij a écrit :
>
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops
> > to
> > endorse a particular Vcs.
> >
> >
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops to
> endorse a particular Vcs.
>
> At this point, it seems uncontroversial to encourage use of Vcs-Git
>
Le ven. 3 févr. 2023 à 18:27, Jelmer Vernooij a écrit :
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops
> to
> endorse a particular Vcs.
>
> At this point, it seems uncontroversial to encourage use of Vcs-Git
>
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops to
endorse a particular Vcs.
At this point, it seems uncontroversial to encourage use of Vcs-Git
specifically here. Apart from technical arguments, it's the vcs that the
majority
12 matches
Mail list logo
