-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:00:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
Hi
[...]
Anyway. Thanks to your excellent research in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in this bug (and your reminder on IRC
that you did this :-), we know that the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to say the target should be
patched, rather than source. For reference, the proposal as it now
reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds.
I object.
On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to say the target should be
patched, rather than source. For reference, the proposal as it now
reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds.
I object. If the standard patched target exists then README.source
should not
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
+ p
+ If, even after this warning, a maintainer still chooses to
+ do so by either creating the layout of the source package
+ such that running prgndpkg-source -x/prgn does not
+ render editable
Hi,
I would like to make one comment:
There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
standard way is to depend on 'unpatch', if you make it depends on
'patch', then all patches are applied by
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
standard way is to depend on 'unpatch', if you make it depends on
'patch', then all
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:32:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm hereby rescinding all previous proposals I made on #250202, to
replace them with the following:
--- policy.sgml.orig 2005-04-26 11:02:02.0 +0200
+++ policy.sgml 2005-04-26 11:28:10.0 +0200
(...)
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050426 15:10]:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:26:41PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:32:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
+ In addition, maintainers should create a target
+ ttsource/tt to the prgndebian/rules/prgn file.
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 16:14, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. What I'm looking for is something unique; so 'source' is clearly
right out. Perhaps 'edit' could be better, or 'finish'. Suggestions are
most certainly welcome.
'prepare' ?
dbs, one of the
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 16:14, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. What I'm looking for is something unique; so 'source' is clearly
right out. Perhaps 'edit' could be better, or 'finish'.
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
dbs, one of the larger contributors to this particular packaging style,
uses setup, so if setup was used all the dbs packages at least
would immediately satisfy the should.
Yes, that
11 matches
Mail list logo
