Hello,
On Sat, Dec 30 2017, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Here's an example of some ugly get-orig-source:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/steamcmd.git/tree/debian/rules
>
> Mea Culpa :-)
>
>
> The software's version is some timestamp of a file inside a tarball:
> bad; I don't really
Hi,
Here's an example of some ugly get-orig-source:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/steamcmd.git/tree/debian/rules
Mea Culpa :-)
The software's version is some timestamp of a file inside a tarball: bad;
I don't really want this scheme supported in uscan; better left it here only.
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 29 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> This is debatable. You might underestimate the challenge involved in
> building some "upstream" tarballs.
Sure, I might be, but I'd really like to see an example of one of these
packages. We can't hold back removing cruft from the Policy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 06:57:55PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 -patch +pending
>
> Hello,
>
> > One would need to check whether get-orig-source use uscan for repacking
> > or if it only use uscan for downloading and then repack manually.
>
> Good point, but note that such cases
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -patch +pending
Bug #515856 [debian-policy] remove get-orig-source
Removed tag(s) patch.
Bug #515856 [debian-policy] remove get-orig-source
Added tag(s) pending.
--
515856: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515856
Debian Bug Tracking System
control: tag -1 -patch +pending
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 01:01:19PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > get-orig-source and watch files serve a different
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:04:04 +0200 Holger Levsen
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:52:27AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
> > index f706a13..27c49b5 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
> > +++
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > get-orig-source and watch files serve a different purpose.
> >
> > get-orig-source is used to build the .orig. tarball from the true
> > upstream one. Most package
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> get-orig-source and watch files serve a different purpose.
>
> get-orig-source is used to build the .orig. tarball from the true
> upstream one. Most package do not need that. Watch files could not do
> that until recently.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:52:27AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> According to codesearch.d.n, get-orig-source is implemented by less than
> 3000 source packages. This is not very low, but neither a high adoption
> rate. It certainly makes using get-orig-source somewhat useless on a
>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:52:27AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> According to codesearch.d.n, get-orig-source is implemented by less than
> 3000 source packages. This is not very low, but neither a high adoption
> rate. It certainly makes using get-orig-source somewhat useless on a
>
11 matches
Mail list logo