Package: debian-policy
The intent of the last paragraph in section 13.3 is that you should be
able to delete /usr/share/doc safely, but that's not quite what it
says.
need to install the instructions for building and installing the
package, of course!
- Files in
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robbe Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
Robbe U+2010, hyphen, in that mail.)
Mandatory? mandated by whom?
Obviously MIME is mandatory for participation in policy process I
infer from your Fix your MUA comment. But
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, Chris Waters wrote:
First, I'd like to say that I'm fairly neutral in this debate. None
So am I, actually. I am proposing it because I said at debconf2 that I
would, after the people there got convinced it would be a good thing by
whomever proposed it.
1. Since we'll be
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:20:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I dislike the rc.d anywhere in the name on general aestetic principles,
but Chris's arguments about the update- prefix are persuasive to me. I'd
much rather see the rc.d name dropped where possible for init, so
we'd have invoke-init,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:20:14PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
+ The system administrator should be able to delete files in
+ `/usr/share/doc' without causing any programs to break. A package
+ should not directly reference files that it places there.
Sure it should: ``further
5 matches
Mail list logo
