;/removals.html;removals/ulink.
Perhaps there should be a note making clear that only removal from unstable
(and experimental) is what is meant here; removals from testing do not give
cause to use this procedure.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Two new fields are introduced:
Build-Depends-Arch, Build-Conflicts-Arch
You are aware, I hope, that the original proposal for the Build-* fields
contained these fields, and they were dropped from the proposal after
several people (buildd admins, if I recall
in Policy as long as
Build-Depends.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian developer http://www.iki.fi/gaia/
pgpBOO1lmOYET.pgp
Description: PGP signature
package.
The policy group does not have objections to using that symlink
if it is created? (Note that policy only refers to GPL and LGPL,
not to GPL-2 or LGPL-2.)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010830T084026-0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
$ head -3 /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
Yes, but that will probably not be true forever.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
the GPL-2 symlink now, and not
in some far-off point in the future.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010502T202937-0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Nah, I know how to munge things to produce its brand of ar files. :-)
That does not address my point.
(Anyway, I can only see a policy should supporting my view, so...)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010501T114542-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 30-Apr-01, 14:33 (CDT), Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could probably do without the latter two, but IIRC the deb format
is internal to dpkg and dpkg-deb is the only supported interface for
creating debs.
Not true
is the only supported interface for
creating debs.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
as the lintian maintainer says lintian is ready
for that.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
.
It was intentional: we decided back then that doing that would render
the fields useless.
(It turned out they are useless anyway, but...:-)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010329T112958+0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
OK, after Wichert's comments, here is a new version of the proposed
amendment to policy.
Seconded.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
pgpHcMbbIlovJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 20010406T060953-1000, Brian Russo wrote:
so it is the GGPL then?
No, it's GNU GPL.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
in auric and pandora.
There may be corner cases.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010325T001056+0100, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
Issues:
allowing multiple lines in control fields breaks the use of grep ; however,
grep-dctrl exists to alleviate this problem.
It is my understanding that this breaks sbuild too.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
believe that sbuild expects them to be on only one line.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
there.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
to the wording are provided.
I support the general spirit of this proposal, though.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010301T103402+, Julian Gilbey wrote:
(and notwithstanding that we're going to require both or neither), it
should say that debian/rules -q with one of the not-provided targets
...
Sounds like a good idea.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
VAR=VALUE ... syntax is used by dpkg-buildpackage.
Once that is done, I think I'll be happy with the proposal.
There is already another proposal about this.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
.
As such I propose that the statement that debian/rules has be to a
makefile be removed.
I object to this proposal, since it leaves debian/rules interface and
behaviour unspecified in many instances. And there is already another
proposal about this.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL
amendment.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
just want to shoot
down half-baked attempts to implement it :-)
Indeed, see my patch in another mail.
OK.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
pgpahHFDgFvg4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
those bits of policy.
The transition to formalized MUST/SHOULD/MAY seems to have missed
this bit.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
pgp6gpFWJ9d2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 20010225T141840+0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20010225T014140+, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies
(i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...)
Build time dependencies have been in policy for 18 months already
On 20010225T131051+, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Of course, with the question of empty dependency lists, there's a
problem
Indeed, and I'd like that to be explicitly addressed somewhere.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On 20010213T084841-0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I dislike it. It's possible some package will exist that is _designed_
to fire off daily status reports by cron. We shouldn't prohibit such
things without reason.
An example is vrms.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
On 20010111T010726+0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
I am now about 2 - 3 days away from my first upload of freeswan. Should it go
into net (instead of non-US) now ? :-)
No.
A proposal does not automatically mean a policy change.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
On 20001031T195631+, Julian Gilbey wrote:
So even though this languished for a month, I would like to reopen
this proposal and second it.
Okay. I hereby withdraw my earlier withdrawal of this proposal.
It's open again.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi
retitle 72335 [WITHDRAWN] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for
debian/rules
thanks
Due to lack of interest, I am withdrawing this proposal.
?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
appreciated.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
--- packaging.sgml.orig Sun Sep 24 16:42:17 2000
+++ packaging.sgml Sun Sep 24 17:16:29 2000
@@ -948,10 +948,11 @@
p
The targets which are required to be present
.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
allows bug reports against the package to be
categorized separately from the policy management process that uses
the BTS
BTW, task-debian-devel depends on build-essential, so many Debian
developers have the package installed anyway.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
the list on the
website,
It is in the website, starting yesterday.
Why are people determined to make information so hard to find?
Why are people determined to make pointless rants instead of filing
useful bugs?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.0
On 2830T184956-0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:51:47PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
The definition is the following:
It is not be necessary to explicitly specify build-time relationships
on a minimal
, the current note in policy manual is not sufficient? (It explicitly
mentions the package build-essential.)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Hypertekstivisionääri Ted Nelson luennoi Jyväskylässä 29.-31.8.
Lisätietoja saa
-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Hypertekstivisionääri Ted Nelson luennoi Jyväskylässä 29.-31.8.
Lisätietoja saa minulta.
that Packaging Manual section 3.2.1 requires that debian/rules
is a makefile.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Hypertekstivisionääri Ted Nelson luennoi Jyväskylässä 29.-31.8.
Lisätietoja saa minulta.
modify the preceding paragraph?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
) and build the examples with no more hassle
than typing ./configure and/or make.
--
You are saying that every (source) example/ directory requires a Makefile?
Please don't CC me. I'm on this mailing list.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
not every user is aware of all that needs done to use a -dev package, that is
what the examples are for, and they should be useable by the user.
Not all such examples are for -dev packages.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL
by SHOULD or RECOMMENDED
are not suitable for the Debian distribution except in exceptional
situations - or something like that (probably should weaken the condition
a little).
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
I'm moving IRL on May 2
for this proposal.
Seconded.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
I'm moving IRL on May 2, 2000.
New contact information on the home page
Yes, it's just in the packaging manual... yes, that is not policy... *yet*
Actually, the DPaM is policy, altough it contains some material that
ought not to be.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
-PX libc6
Essential:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:34:25]:pip$
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
as such.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 06:54:27PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Sure, I amend my proposal to use Antti-Juhani's wording.
In that case I second the proposal.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
you are really saying is that this is another bug in the
policy.
No, I am saying that the arrangement is like this by design, not by
accident.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John
the bug date reflects when the clock
starts ticking on the bug.
(/usr/doc/debian-policy/proposal.text.gz)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.0.0
- Forwarded message from Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:13:45 +0200
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging
forwarded 49901 debian-policy@lists.debian.org
thanks
This bug is not a proposal or amendment; it is a typo bug, and is now
marked forwarded so that the policy editors may do with it whatever
they choose.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
/syeGaPcBgLebywId3qDX1NDlmzToadFBVeR
l7HyjfaQ1jZKxlDD5Xf/gF3sYXlsi7ImpZFICy0s+4koPK2Q/k8U1LqjC/p5sADX
oCDGsOBRaCo=
=S4R3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
in the Free
Software community. This functionality is not yet included.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:22:06]:~$
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
(and occasionally yet another for frozen).
Why not call this task-build-essential, as I originally proposed?
Because this is not a task package and should not presented for
installation at system install time with the other metapackages.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 04:51:23PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
How do you define complete implementation?
A dpkg-source that:
a) supports build-dependencies
b) supports multiple patches
c) can setup a buildroot and start building everything
it badly.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
?
No.
groff/man ?
No.
wish ?
No.
python ?
No.
jdk ?
No.
Remember, this list is supposed to be MINIMAL.
BTW, what do you people think of the metapackage idea (see the new Policy
draft thread)?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 07:22:00AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Should dpkg-dev possibly depend on anything we consider to be assumed
for build dependencies?
I'd create a separate metapackage for that, as I already proposed elsewhere.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
-get install the
metapackage and whatever the Build-* fields specify to build a package.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
(untested):
grep-available -PX task-build-essential -sDepends -n | tr ',' '
' build-essential.txt
This is trivially automatisable.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
at metapackage build time to both the Depends line and the
/usr/share/doc file (which can, additionally, be installed in the web
pages, if people prefer that).
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John
were still hammering out the thing. I even called for people with
complicated packages to give their input when I made the proposal.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
-Indep:
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
are you talking about?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
the architecture-independent packages.
I really wish you had spoken up back then when we could have made the
wording more clear on this.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
to play with it.
I would be interested in taking a look at it.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
by all people who have made
significant changes to the manual.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 03:01:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I have a shell script that does the above algorithm, if people
are interested.
Yes.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
there are some such config files. I believe tetex has one, for
example.
Which is...?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 08:17:46AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
on the bug report or in the debian-policy mailing list archives. Would
somebody fill me in as to why it was rejected? Thank you!
Because nobody cared about this proposal enough to second it, I'd wager.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani
this to debian/rules:
build-debug: BUILD_DEBUG=y
build-debug: build
You can use other make variables of course.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 07:27:35AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
I think sticking with an env will make it much easier for some one to just
Of course. I just wanted to point out that it is possible to avoid code
duplication even in a Makefile :-)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED
of the Make info file. I don't know
how widely this is implemented by other makes.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
(John Cage)
retitle 41232 [ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages
forwarded 41232 debian-policy@lists.debian.org
thanks
I think it is safe to say this amendment is accepted. If you don't agree,
speak up *now*.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 02:18:41AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
Thus the discussion should end on Friday, the 13th of this month.
This deadline is almost at hand. I've produced a final draft of the
amendment for your review. Consider it frozen: i will not make any
substantial changes
or HOST for
specification of the machine we build for.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
proposal sent out, if necessary.)
I will be away for a few days starting from later today (Sat).
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution
will be easily converted to your ways if you just convince me of this
point ;-)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
;-)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
the information duplicated
in README.Debian.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
lighter.
It's about as light as my build-time dependency proposal.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
to
move to /usr/share/doc now, ten policy should not mandate it now.
(Of course this is all academic now as the technical committee has
been invoked.)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications
?
Everybody who knows Debian policy.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
Slink), please use
+ /usr/doc whereever this document refers to
+ /usr/share/doc./p
Seconded.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup
, 38393, 38754, 39204, 39275, 41611, and of course 41808.
These bugs manifest themselves in certain special situations (either
a self-dependency or a dependency cycle involving a virtual package).
Most of the time dependency cycles are OK.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:52:04PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
The policy was immature.
Shouldn't the decision be undone for now, then?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 12:29:29AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
why don't we follow the Perl team's lead
I most definitely agree with your plan.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications
to depend on a base-files with a
usr/share/doc/ directory.
Why?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
, and to undo the change wrt /usr/doc (not the whole FHS,
though), until a solution is found.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 02:05:31PM -0400, James Mastros wrote:
Beutiful... so we're already implementing this.
Current policy specifies /usr/share/doc .
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many
.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
some minor inconvenience.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
should be
changed.
I'm not reverting my packages as long as policy dictates /usr/share/doc.
The issue is not that critical.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ...
(Bjarne Stroustrup
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:53:24AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
Those people now wanting to undo the change had
plenty of opportunity to cause the change to never happen in the first
place.
Are you saying I should be actively violating Policy?
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
