debian-policy_4.7.0.0_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2024-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:08:55 +0800 Source: debian-policy Architecture: source Version: 4.7.0.0 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors

Bug#1035733: marked as done (debian -policy: packages must not use dpkg-divert to override default systemd configuraton files)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035733: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035733, regarding debian -policy: packages must not use dpkg-divert to override default systemd configuraton files to be marked as

Bug#1039102: marked as done (debian-policy: make systemd units mandatory for packages shipping system services)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1039102: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1039102, regarding debian-policy: make systemd units mandatory for packages shipping system services to be marked as done. This means

Bug#984511: marked as done (debian-policy: please clarify how archive areas can be combined in source packages)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994008: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994008, regarding debian-policy: please clarify how archive areas can be combined in source packages to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1029211: marked as done (debian-policy: Add mention of the new non-free-firmware archive area)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029211: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029211, regarding debian-policy: Add mention of the new non-free-firmware archive area to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#968226: marked as done (Move documentation of Build-Depends alternative selection out of footnote)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968226: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #968226, regarding Move documentation of Build-Depends alternative selection out of footnote to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#994008: marked as done (debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994008: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994008, regarding debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas to be marked as done. This

Bug#963524: marked as done (debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963524: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #963524, regarding debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads to be marked as done.

Bug#970234: marked as done (consider dropping "No hard links in source packages")

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#970234: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #970234, regarding consider dropping "No hard links in source packages" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1068192: marked as done (debian-policy: extend forbidden network access to contrib and non-free)

2024-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068192: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068192, regarding debian-policy: extend forbidden network access to contrib and non-free to be marked as done. This means that you

Processing of debian-policy_4.7.0.0_source.changes

2024-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debian-policy_4.7.0.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-policy_4.7.0.0.dsc debian-policy_4.7.0.0.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-06 Thread Tobias Frost
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2024-04-04 22:38, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > I'm not sure what I think about that. We have a general escape hatch > > > already for non-free packages in Policy

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > If we go that route, here is a proposed alternative patch: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to any

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Sean Whitton writes: > We have two seconded solutions, so you and I should perhaps break the > tie. I prefer the Bill's 'Autobuild: no' solution as the more > conservative change: we only have data about packages that are currently > autobuilt, not those that aren't, so we might be making those