Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:08:55 +0800
Source: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.7.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035733: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035733,
regarding debian -policy: packages must not use dpkg-divert to override default
systemd configuraton files
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1039102: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039102,
regarding debian-policy: make systemd units mandatory for packages shipping
system services
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994008: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #994008,
regarding debian-policy: please clarify how archive areas can be combined in
source packages
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1029211: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029211,
regarding debian-policy: Add mention of the new non-free-firmware archive area
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968226: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #968226,
regarding Move documentation of Build-Depends alternative selection out of
footnote
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994008: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #994008,
regarding debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary
packages' archive areas
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963524: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #963524,
regarding debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in
.changes on source-only uploads
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970234: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #970234,
regarding consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068192: fixed in debian-policy 4.7.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068192,
regarding debian-policy: extend forbidden network access to contrib and non-free
to be marked as done.
This means that you
debian-policy_4.7.0.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_4.7.0.0.dsc
debian-policy_4.7.0.0.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2024-04-04 22:38, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what I think about that. We have a general escape hatch
> > > already for non-free packages in Policy
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> If we go that route, here is a proposed alternative patch:
>
> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
> @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@
> For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules``
> to any
Sean Whitton writes:
> We have two seconded solutions, so you and I should perhaps break the
> tie. I prefer the Bill's 'Autobuild: no' solution as the more
> conservative change: we only have data about packages that are currently
> autobuilt, not those that aren't, so we might be making those
14 matches
Mail list logo