On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:20:05PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Regarding 'finding' devices later on so xcdroast doesn't whine: there
should be a script 'rescan-scsi-bus.sh' with xcdroast. Failing this, just
do
echo scsi-add-single-device 0 0 n 0 /proc/scsi/scsi
where n is the SCSI ID
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 11:20:02PM +0100, Michael Flaig wrote:
sorry, forgot cc to the list ...
From: Michael Flaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wolfgang Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Build errors for 2.4.25-ben1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:14:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On
sebyte wrote:
I have partitioned my hard drive, (using Apple's Disk Utility), as follows:
As was mentioned in another reply, you shouldn't try to do the
partitioning through Apple's Disk Utility. IMHO, it's terrible, not to
mention it wastes big chunks of space between partitions for no
Incoming from Derrik Pates:
sebyte wrote:
I have partitioned my hard drive, (using Apple's Disk Utility), as follows:
[snip]
And since you're installing on a laptop, why are you splitting your main
filesystem into partitions? Especially /boot, /tmp, /var, /usr, /home,
etc. all on one FS?
Incoming from s. keeling:
Incoming from Derrik Pates:
sebyte wrote:
I have partitioned my hard drive, (using Apple's Disk Utility), as follows:
[snip]
And since you're installing on a laptop, why are you splitting your main
filesystem into partitions? Especially /boot, /tmp, /var,
I forgot to write the type of the actual card. lspci tells me it is a
Broadcom BCM94306 802.11g card
Broadcom seems to be uninterested in providing any kind of specs
or driver to linux for this chipset...
Ben.
Hi David, recently i had the same problem with 2.6 and it was
because i forgot to build pci support in the kernel.
Hope it helps ;-)
I am also having problems booting the new kernel.
It complains about being unable to mount the root VFS hda11 or hda11
The kernel image is compiled with xfs
Hi s.!
you might want to rethink not putting /tmp,/var/tmp on their own
partitions. tmp might fill up especially in a testing (sarge), dist and
that might lock up your root filesystem. then login into X might get
very difficult.
you might also want to try mounting different partitions with
Hi rusty!
surfing the web via my palm/bluetooth right now ...
uname -a
Linux aibuk 2.6.3-ben2-20040222 #1 Sun Feb 22 18:35:59 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
modules involved:
ohci_hcd, hci_usb, hci_vhci
regs
* rusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-23 08:54:
From: rusty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 00:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 07:53, Simon Bergamin wrote:
Hi,
the kernel 2.6.3-benh1 (Gentoo ebuild) hangs on my PB 12. It happens
when mounting the proc filesystem, I don't get any errors, it just stops
with the boot process. The
Ben,
I have already disabled pmac_zilog, no difference. BTW, the ps/2 bug I
mentioned in an earlier post is still reproducable with pmac_zilog not
set.
You can use xmon to find out where it is hung.
(Break into xmon with cmd-power and get a backtrace with t)
Ben.
On (22/02/04 10:16), s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from nico dreher:
What do you use?
w and top; once in the latter, press u and type the user's
name.
All this time I've been using top and never knew I could do that
what a list! Thanks ;)
Clive
--
http://www.clivemenzies.co.uk
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Ben,
I have already disabled pmac_zilog, no difference. BTW, the ps/2 bug I
mentioned in an earlier post is still reproducable with pmac_zilog not
set.
You can use xmon to find out where it is hung.
(Break into xmon with
Uhh, I'm new to this and did not found any docs on the net about xmon.
When am I supposed to break into xmon? During boot or when the system is
up with another kernel? And with cmd-power you mean
[apple][power-switch], don't you? I tried that on power-up (threw me
into OpenFirmware, but t is
hi nicholas...
* Nicholas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-23 09:02 +0100]:
I have just installed Debian onto my powerbook, but I think I misconfigured
X. When it starts up, there is nothing but jumbled graphics. I would like to
boot without X so I can try and fix it, but I cant seem to
On 23/02/2004 at 00:05, s. keeling wrote:
This is ridiculous advice and I wish people like you would stop
offering it. Multiple partitions make the system far more robust and
usable in many ways, from backing it up through system stability.
This is just as true for a laptop as it is for
Le lun 23/02/2004 à 10:05, Klaus Ita a écrit :
Hi rusty!
surfing the web via my palm/bluetooth right now ...
uname -a
Linux aibuk 2.6.3-ben2-20040222 #1 Sun Feb 22 18:35:59 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
modules involved:
ohci_hcd, hci_usb, hci_vhci
regs
Please can you provide the right
On 23 Feb 2004 at 12h02, Kiko Piris wrote:
Hi,
One other advantage in separating partitions is security: you can mount
/boot ro,noexec,nodev,nosuid, /home nosuid,nodev, /tmp nosuid,nodev,
etc. (http://www.seifried.org/lasg/installation/).
/home nosuid is painful on real shared computers
On 23/02/2004 at 13:02, Colin Leroy wrote:
On 23 Feb 2004 at 12h02, Kiko Piris wrote:
Hi,
One other advantage in separating partitions is security: you can mount
/boot ro,noexec,nodev,nosuid, /home nosuid,nodev, /tmp nosuid,nodev,
etc. (http://www.seifried.org/lasg/installation/).
On 23 Feb 2004 at 13h02, Colin Leroy wrote:
Hi,
Anyway, /lib/ld.so.1 has to be executable
PS: please people don't chmod -x /lib/ld.so.1, you'd only get angry after that.
--
Colin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:02:42PM +0100, Colin Leroy wrote:
On 23 Feb 2004 at 12h02, Kiko Piris wrote:
One other advantage in separating partitions is security: you can mount
/boot ro,noexec,nodev,nosuid, /home nosuid,nodev, /tmp nosuid,nodev,
etc.
On 23 Feb 2004 at 13h02, Kiko Piris wrote:
Hi,
I guess you mean noexec. I was talking about nosuid. They're not the
same...
Uh, yes, sorry for the noise :(
--
Colin
have to wakeup at least...
s. keeling wrote:
This is ridiculous advice and I wish people like you would stop
offering it. Multiple partitions make the system far more robust and
usable in many ways, from backing it up through system stability.
This is just as true for a laptop as it is for servers.
The single partition
Derrik Pates wrote:
P.S. Are there any good reasons for choosing ext2 filesystems over
ext3, or vice versa?
Go with ext3. If the system crashes, or whatever, you don't have to
sit and wait while fsck runs on the filesystem.
Really? I thougth ext2 was better because it doesn't write
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 06:46, Kiko Piris wrote:
On 23/02/2004 at 00:05, s. keeling wrote:
This is ridiculous advice and I wish people like you would stop
offering it. Multiple partitions make the system far more robust and
usable in many ways, from backing it up through system stability.
On 23/02/2004 at 07:52, Albert Cahalan wrote:
If stability were an issue, we'd need to fix that
instead of using a gross work-around.
Yes, you're right.
Nope. This is Linux, which kicks ass. On your
single-partition Linux 2.6 system, do this:
mount --bind /home /home
mount --bind -o
On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:45 AM, Derrik Pates wrote:
sebyte wrote:
I have partitioned my hard drive, (using Apple's Disk Utility), as
follows:
As was mentioned in another reply, you shouldn't try to do the
partitioning through Apple's Disk Utility. IMHO, it's terrible, not to
mention it wastes
On Feb 22, 2004, at 5:26 PM, Seb Tennant wrote:
[...]
Did you burn your .iso image in OS X? If so, how did you do
it so that it would boot from your computer?
Yes I did burn my .iso image to disk in OS X. I used Roxio's Toast
Titanium. I'm not sure why, but Toast often works where
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:25, Kiko Piris wrote:
On 23/02/2004 at 07:52, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Nope. This is Linux, which kicks ass. On your
single-partition Linux 2.6 system, do this:
mount --bind /home /home
mount --bind -o remount,nosuid /home /home
Oh!, nice thing. I discovered
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:08:14PM +0100, Le Sensei... wrote:
I had just thought about that yesterday too !
Having the airport extreme card used by macosx under mol and using the mol
machine as a gateway could probably be done. One would probably have to code
some bits to let macosx see the
When I compile the source on my 9500MP running 2.4.23 woody I have this
error:
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/benH/src-linux-2.4-benh/arch/ppc/mm'
/usr/bin/make CFLAGS=-D__KERNEL__
-I/usr/src/benH/src-linux-2.4-benh/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigraphs -O2
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 03:15, Victor Fuente wrote:
Hi David, recently i had the same problem with 2.6 and it was
because i forgot to build pci support in the kernel.
I just tried the same .config with 2.6.3 vanilla and it is working, I
will just stick with that for a bit.
--
David Stanaway
On Feb 23, 2004, at 11:44 AM, Fabio Poroli wrote:
Hi
Is somebody using Eclipse 3.0M... on a PowerPc - Linux?
I tried few times to build SWT but without success.
Any hints building it ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 the mental interface of
Benjamin Herrenschmidt told:
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 00:28, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 the mental interface of
Benjamin Herrenschmidt told:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, [iso-8859-1] Diego Bellavia wrote:
clear, but what I would like to do is to install a
debian testing distribution (Sarge); I think the best
way to do it is to install a very little core of
debian from wich install the complete debian testing
distribution (so,a network
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:06:51PM -0500, J. MacPhail wrote:
My question, is it sensible to try for a little more convenience, by
attempting to configure hotplug for automatic actions when an external
scsi device is powered on/off?
I could be wrong, but I'd be extremely surprised if the
Hi all,
I tried to build 2.6.3-ben2 with the old radeonfb but it failed the
built with:
drivers/built-in.o(.init.data+0x224c): undefined reference to
`radeonfb_init'
drivers/built-in.o(.init.data+0x2250): undefined reference to
`radeonfb_setup'
in the last step of building vmlinuz.
Any hints?
Die folgende Mail wurde nicht weitergeleitet, da bei der Bearbeitung ein Fehler
aufgetreten ist.
Datum: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:39:05 +0100
Betreff: hi
Sender: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Empfänger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grund des Fehlers: Die Mail enthält einen Virus.
Attention:
A mail message
Hi,
I'm sorry for this post as I believe it is a little bit offtopic. I own a G3
800 ibook and since some time, the ibook fails to suspend when I close it, as
it used to before. I believe I read somewhere this could happen and it would
require some kind of reset. Am I right? or is it a hardware
Esta respuesta se ha generado automáticamente para hacerte saber que nuestro
sistema recibió tu consulta y que un representante del servicio de soporte
técnico la leerá y le responderá en breve. Ten en cuenta que no recibirás
ninguna respuesta si respondes directamente a este mensaje.
SI NO
Esta respuesta se ha generado automáticamente para responder a su pregunta lo
antes posible. Tenga en cuenta que no recibirá ninguna respuesta si responde
directamente a este mensaje.
Desafortunadamente, el mensaje que envió no hace referencia a una cuenta de
Hotmail sobre la que podamos
After you're done please file an
installer report, there haven't been enough people testing
the PPC port.
I've successfully installed Debian using the debian-sarge-netinst.iso
installer on an Apple G4. I'd be happy to file an installer report.
Could you post a link and/or describe how you
I'm having problems getting mol-modules with apt. Every other package
upgrades fine but mol-modules has been broken for some months now. The
error message from apt is below.
The following packages will be upgraded:
mol-modules-2.4.22-powerpc
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 07:39, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to build 2.6.3-ben2 with the old radeonfb but it failed the
built with:
drivers/built-in.o(.init.data+0x224c): undefined reference to
`radeonfb_init'
drivers/built-in.o(.init.data+0x2250): undefined reference to
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 18:10, David Ulrich wrote:
my config for 2.4.24-ben1:
http://www.geocities.com/wolfgangpfeiffer/config-2.4.24-ben1.txt
It's a rather modular kernel ... :)
cat /proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
cpu : 7455, altivec supported
clock : 867MHz
revision
On Tue 02/24/04 01:18, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi,
I think that the parent poster is not running Debian, but OS X. At
least, that's what I read from it.
If you check out the headers, you'll note that it was written in KMail
and signed on a GNU/Linux box. So, my bet is Debian.
--
46 matches
Mail list logo
