On 16 Aug, this message from W. Crowshaw echoed through cyberspace:
I've come to the conclusion that
there is something fundamentally wrong with either
this driver or the way this card is recognized
by the kernel or some combination of both. Maybe it
has something to do with the pci
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 23:18, W. Crowshaw wrote:
Any ideas, or should I just sell the cards on e-bay?
I'd try a newer XFree86 version first.
Really? Say it isn't so. Upgrading to debian
unstable isn't very enticing and damn if I want to
build another app from scratch.
If the
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Yes, I have an Xclaim3D with 3D RAGE II+. Works fine with atyfb (I originally
wrote atyfb for that card ;-). I still use XFree86 3.x BTW.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
Cool! You
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, W. Crowshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
It could be a Xclaim3D. AFAIK these were built with either a 3D RAGE II+
(like
mine) or a 3D RAGE Pro.
So you're using a Xclaim3D card? Have you
experienced the problems that I am
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
It could be a Xclaim3D. AFAIK these were built with either a 3D RAGE II+ (like
mine) or a 3D RAGE Pro.
smaller chip that says Nexus GA 42601 on it.
That's probably the firmware ROM. So it contains `Nexus GA' firmware, and
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:21:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:17, W. Crowshaw wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:28:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
I would really like to get 2 monitors going [...]
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:18:44 -0500
W. Crowshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I didn't follow the discussion... maybe this won't apply to your
particuklar issue.
However, if you have troubles getting an ATI XClaim 3D working with X, I can
remember I had one working.
The card was an ATI XCLaim
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, W. Crowshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:21:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:17, W. Crowshaw wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:28:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
I would
Just poked around in my 7500 Open Firmware with the
card attached. The card is identified as a NexusGA.
If it was an XClaim3D, the firmware would have said,
because they use that card as an example on the
Apple Firmware how-to's. Just another clue.
--
wcrowshaw
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, W. Crowshaw wrote:
Thanks for your response. See my responsed below.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:28:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
4) the ATI card I believe is a NexusGA, because it
matches specs on the ATI
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:17, W. Crowshaw wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:28:46PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
I would really like to get 2 monitors going [...]
The atimisc driver doesn't support this yet.
Yep, I know. The
Michel,
Thanks for your response. See my responsed below.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:28:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
4) the ATI card I believe is a NexusGA, because it
matches specs on the ATI website. But the chip
on it
Thomas,
Thanks for your help. However, I didn't take the
card bus ID from lspci but from 'cat /proc/pci.
Besides the ID is good because the computer does
send signals to the moniter through the card at that
busID because I do get really distorted crosshatched
craziness for a picture.
Perhaps I
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 23:17, William Crowshaw wrote:
4) the ATI card I believe is a NexusGA, because it
matches specs on the ATI website. But the chip
on it says ATI Rage 128 3D AGP.
Where exactly does it say that? All the other info you provide indicates
that it's a Mach64 chip in
I can only give you some hints nontheless:
Try to autogenerate a new XF86Config-4 via xf86config (this worked
perfecty fine for me, ATI Radeon on an ibook)
4) the ATI card I believe is a NexusGA, because it
matches specs on the ATI website. But the chip
on it says ATI Rage 128 3D
15 matches
Mail list logo
