Le mercredi, 7 mars 2018, 09.13:12 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Okay. Seems safe enough to try.
Ha ha. Good I tried.
E: printer-driver-postscript-hp: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-
object usr/lib/cups/filter/hpps
E: printer-driver-postscript-hp: missing-dependency-on-libc
Le mardi, 6 mars 2018, 14.35:47 h CET Brian Potkin a écrit :
> That went through my mind too, so it might be useful to refer to message
> 32 of #649991:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649991#32
>
> Having hpps in printer-driver-postscript-hp and the package recommending
>
On Tue 06 Mar 2018 at 09:07:17 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 4 mars 2018, 18.17:58 h CET Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > Moving to something else brought up in this report:
>
> Dropping the bug, adding the list…
>
> > is it really necessary for the hpps filter to be in hplip?
Le dimanche, 4 mars 2018, 18.17:58 h CET Brian Potkin a écrit :
> Moving to something else brought up in this report:
Dropping the bug, adding the list…
> is it really necessary for the hpps filter to be in hplip? Could it not be
> put in printer-driver-postscript-hp as is done for the filter
