Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining Upstream why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to be distributed in Debian. What are the crucial changes that made CC BY 2.5 Free while

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom between CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Am 25.01.13 15:07, schrieb Charles Plessy: There are also moin, netcdf-java, vlc, or wxmaxima, which either have an inaccurate copyright file or contain files licensed under CC-BY-(SA-)2.5 (and pinta with by-nc-nd-2.5). Note that I have not tried to be exhaustive in my search. I have to

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Christoph Egger
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can