I think if we can find a way to manage it technically, allowing people
to forward email would be a reasonable thing to do.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> non-uploading DD where the MIA team is not looking at.
Is this because of it being hard to track the contributions of
non-uploading DDs?
Is the MIA team looking at contributors.d.o data?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hello Mattia,
On Wed, Nov 15 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> IMHO if somebody care to keep their forward email usable they can very
> well care enough to have a robust enough key and keep it in the
> keyring, and possibly be demoted to non-uploading DD where the MIA
> team is not looking at.
I'd l
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:45:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> In many cases (such this particular one) people don't have a viable gpg
> key anymore in the keyring: that means they can't email
> chan...@db.debian.org to update their LDAP details (theoretically, they
> might still know the LDAP
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:08:41PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It would be possible to have an "emeritus" keyring, I guess. Since it
> would only be used for email forwarding and a few other things, it
> could have weaker security requirements.
Techinically such keyring exists, but they are not e
Peter Palfrader writes ("Re: Emeritus status, and email forwarding"):
> Without a key in a keyring that somebody maintains, authenticating such
> requests, even manually, is going to be a PITA.
Mattia Rizzolo writes ("Re: Emeritus status, and email forwarding"):
> In many cases (such this particul
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
> > kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
> > forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have the
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have the wide powers of an active
DD/DM account.
Unless this
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
> kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
> forwarding.
In many cases (such this particular one) people don't have a viable gpg
key anymore
also sprach Ian Jackson [2017-11-15 13:17
+0100]:
> So, you could ship it to me. Perhaps Debian wants to pay for the
> shipping out of Debian funds.
Thanks Ian,
at the moment I'm talking to someone in Cuba who'd have good use of
them if we can figure out how to get them over. On the other hand
martin f krafft writes ("Debian banners"):
> I still have some heavy-duty banners we've used at conferences, as
> well as a banner stand in my basement that I need to get rid of.
> If you want them or you have an idea what to do with them, please
> let me know. Else, come the end of November, I'll
Someone who was sort-of-MIA said on -private that they would like to
keep their @debian.org email forwarding indefinitely, as they move to
emeritus status.
I think that, with some safeguards[1], this would be a good thing to
offer people. If nothing else people have often used @d.o addresses
in D
12 matches
Mail list logo
