Le Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:40:15PM +0200, Jonas Meurer a écrit :
>
> And a side note: please accept that others in the project have opinions
> that object to yours. Not agreeing with your point of view doesn't mean
> that you're silenced or censored, despite you behaving like this. Quite
> on the
* Ole Streicher:
> You may guess that people using github accept pull requests, but you
> even can't see whether they actually like them -- there are many reasons
> why people use github, and PRs may not necessarily the specific reason
> for the repository.
And you can't disable this Github featu
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 9/13/19 2:35 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to
>> maintain Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send
>> a patch to the BTS.
>
> If one slenderizes about a particular VCS URL, it
Hello all
El 30/9/19 a las 15:29, Neil McGovern escribió:
> Thanks Chris and all for the support that's been shown in this thread,
> it really does mean a lot while we're going through this complex period.
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 12:25:53AM +0100, Andy Simpkins wrote:
>> Having read the 'cl
Norbert Preining:
>>> It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain
>>> Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send a patch to the
>>> BTS.
>>
>> If one slenderizes about a particular VCS URL, it means it is where he
>> wishes to have pull/merge reque
Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development
task"):
> Ian Jackson:
> > Such a small, essentially honorary, contribution wouldn't distort our
> > volunteer setup, and don't need the levels of serious review and
> > engagement that a larger amount does. But it would
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > If one slenderizes about a particular VCS URL, it means it is where he
> > wishes to have pull/merge requests from. Otherwise, what's the point?
>
> Wrong. I don't care for PR, and accept them as well as patches to BTS,
> whatever comes. This is FUD
> > It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain
> > Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send a patch to the
> > BTS.
>
> If one slenderizes about a particular VCS URL, it means it is where he
> wishes to have pull/merge requests from. Otherwise,
On 9/13/19 12:51 PM, Andy Simpkins wrote:
> Just because you, and I, believe that "No Debian contributor should be
> expected or encouraged... ...to use any non-free tools" does not mean
> that we should *prevent* them from doing so.
Though advertising for a non-free service through the VCS fields
On 9/13/19 2:35 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain
> Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send a patch to the
> BTS.
If one slenderizes about a particular VCS URL, it means it is where he
wishes to have pull/
On 9/13/19 8:14 AM, Ansgar wrote:
> So assume I want to avoid using non-free DNS and CDN services, but still
> contribute to Debian. How should that work as long as Debian uses these
> services?
If you have in mind the CDN used for security updates, well it'd be a
nice idea if DSAs were thinking
❦ 4 octobre 2019 16:57 +02, Thomas Goirand :
>>> That would just lead to packages using these to no longer including the
>>> Vcs-* fields... There are some valid reasons to host packages on
>>> services such as GitLab or GitHub such as when they are hosted there as
>>> part of the upstream proj
On 9/16/19 6:53 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 9/12/19 7:49 PM, Ansgar wrote:
>
>> That would just lead to packages using these to no longer including the
>> Vcs-* fields... There are some valid reasons to host packages on
>> services such as GitLab or GitHub such as when they are hosted there as
13 matches
Mail list logo
