Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Tobias Frost
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Is there some way right now for me to say "any Debian contributor with > upload rights should feel free to merge changes and upload this package > without needing to consult me at all, and I will subscribe to the packages > feed for

Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes: > I really think it's not the matter, to me the matter is package > ownership. While new contributors should feel that it's mandatory to > discuss with maintainers, having people clamped so tightly to their > packages that you don't know if these are actually

Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Didier Raboud (2022-10-07 15:24:23) > (This is the continuation of an unspecified thread in the debian-private list > that generated enough positive content that I deemed it smart enough to jump > off from it, to a public mailing list. I'm not quoting anything from anyone, > but

Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > Looking at how Ubuntu is structured (with topic teams) made me wonder if some > variation of that couldn't reasonably be applied to Debian, by dividing our > giant set in subsets (topic teams, baskets, ...), under clearer team's >

Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Didier Raboud wrote on 07/10/2022 at 15:24:23+0200: > (This is the continuation of an unspecified thread in the debian-private list > that generated enough positive content that I deemed it smart enough to jump > off from it, to a public mailing list. I'm not quoting anything from anyone, >