On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:31:44PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> OK, great, but I'm not sure precisely now what patch I should send -
> ie, what ought to be in the page footer. Since you know the answers,
> would you mind arranging that the popcon web pages contain the right
> references ?
>
>
ugs against, or a repository for the server
> > side to file merge requests against.
>
> I looked here:
> https://popcon.debian.org/
> and then at the page footer.
>
> It has
> [Popularity-contest project] by Avery Pennarun, Bill Allombert and
> Petter Reinholdtsen.
> w
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I might have overlooked better contact information, but couldn't find a
> popcon.debian.org to report bugs against, or a repository for the server
> side to file merge requests against.
>
> I'm not sure how that
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I might have overlooked better contact information, but couldn't find a
> popcon.debian.org to report bugs against, or a repository for the server
> side to file merge requests against.
There are a popularity-contest
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:14:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
Unfortunately I have a problem with the renaming of my pet service
Buildd.Net on https://wiki.debian.org/Services. I added my service as
BuilddNet and it got renamed to
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:32:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Nevertheless your opinion is interesting to me [...]
[explanations]
Thanks for that.
If you find clarification of the license that are grounded in the actual
text and written by B. Kuhn or the FSF, please forward them.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
* Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception).
(The main program I'm
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:45:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Bill Allombert writes (Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project):
I am fine with the stated purpose of the AGPLv3, however I do not think the
actual implementation is compatible with free software.
Perhaps I haven't looked
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
day
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:06:56PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I would greatly appreciate it if people would help the process by
supporting the efforts of the DSA team consistently rather than heaping
praise on them when they fix compromises and scorn on them the rest of
the time. It would
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061221 15:12]:
As I suggested in my DPL platform, having someone reading debian-admin
who has no DSA priviledge but handle communication issues could help
(by providing status and ETA
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:22:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
really responsive.
So apparently this
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:02:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment
people to say we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it, and make
up their own target date for etch, and demonstrate how much energy and
effort can be
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:57:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10860 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
So, if you want a machine from the following list, send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and give a rough description what you plan to do with
it.
Hihi, Update: Please notice that the
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:21:59AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Steve McIntyre said:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:08:54PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:00:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
The best thing that can be done to reconcile
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:00:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Baz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I prefer to see etch released in a timely manner - I prefer to see the
DWN released weekly in the same excellent degree. An organization such
as The Debian Project can certainly do both. Anthony
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:03:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
- Experimental Linux kernel build server (Bastian Blank)
- GCC 4.2 tests on SPARC (Martin Michlmayr)
If you would like to have access, please get in contact with Bastian at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The specification of the
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 06:46:43PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:49:37PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
I propose to set up a lintian.debian.org-equivalent for sparc on this
machine, but this requires 10GB of diskspace and a local mirror. Tell me
if you think
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:37:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:53:27AM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:14:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.11.1002 +0200]:
This is quite
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:09:06AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Person A gets mad becuase he is afraid that person B will will
get pay for something that both had originally agreed to do for free.
Now there's a key part of the problem: this
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:14:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.11.1002 +0200]:
This is quite frustrating, since most of the applicants are surely
doing already the normal work every Developer has to do, but are
not able to upload or
[mostly reposting what I sent to debian-private]
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I also explained that Dunc-Tank's initial experiment of funding release
manager is not a long term model for us. And as a board member, I said
that I don't intend to fund other
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The set of projects that can be funded are projects proposed by Debian
developers. I expect Debian developers to propose only projects that are
improving Debian.
If some of those projects also serve the private interest of
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:54:09PM -0700, Michael Wheatley wrote:
The fundamental problem is that a newbie lacks the understanding of
the system or the patience that is needed to submit a bug
report.
I hate to break it to you, but becoming an advanced user does not make
you more patient :)
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:21:44PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
We have a strong suspicion of who the author is.
This mail has been sent to harm Debian. We should not make the task
easier by using it as a pretext to harm ourself by throwing random
accusations, so please let us exerce some
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:24:18AM +0200, Michael Gro?er wrote:
Someone gave me an answer that was rather useless to me:
He gave me a URL that was a dead link.
But: I found out that (nearly) all other people in this
forum and in my circle of friends could resolve that link,
but I could
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 09:47:18AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
How much longer do you want to continue this idiotic one-up-manship
before you're willing to try a different approach of working with people?
Hello Anthony,
Please assume the DPL asked you that exact same question.
What would you
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:44:48AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It is important, in particular, to account for the fact that Ubuntu is not
the only Debian derivative, and that proposals like yours would amount to
Debian derivatives being obliged to fork *every source package in Debian*
for the
I have argued previously (on debian-legal and elsewhere) that for some types
of works, such as icons, fonts, and documentation, source code is not
important to the modifiability of a work in the same way that it is to
programs. There are many cases in which the original source form used by
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:08:25PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
maintainer didn't really test the package after installing it because
it was too much trouble. If it can be standardised and automated, and
if a way can be found for Ubuntu to share tests with Debian, then
everyone wins.
piuparts
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:35:25PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Bill Allombert writes (Re: Automated testing - design and interfaces):
piuparts is a first answer to that: it allows maintainer to check that
their package will install, remove and upgrade in a clean environnement.
Yes
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:43:32PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
So, what do you think ?
Currently Debian packages are tested through a lot of channel:
-- At build-time, if the package run a test-suite in debian/rules,
which is strongly encouraged.
-- By the maintainer before uploading them.
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 06:02:54PM +0200, R. Armiento wrote:
Result: users of KDE with the 'random screensaver' setting
eventually find their screens filled with sexually explicit
content. And even if that should be fixed, users flipping
through the screensavers risk being presented with
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:15:14PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being
de-listed
as a Debian consultant because he hasn't
34 matches
Mail list logo
