Re: Wonderful OS

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 20:09, Richard Bostrom wrote: > > Your Operating System is Wonderful. > Thank you for providing Nvidia Drivers. > Dear Mr. Richardh Bostrom You are right! Imagine for a moment what would happen if the Linux kernel community and the Debian community decide to not support

Wonderful OS

Your Operating System is Wonderful. Thank you for providing Nvidia Drivers. Best regards Richardh Bostrom Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

RE: [Confirmation request] Regarding EOS/EOL of Debian OS (as of October 2023)

: [Confirmation request] Regarding EOS/EOL of Debian OS (as of October 2023) On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:00:00PM +, endo.hirofumi wrote: > This is the main topic, but please check the EOS and EOL of the following > products provided by your project. > Could you please give me some guidance? >

Re: [Confirmation request] Regarding EOS/EOL of Debian OS (as of October 2023)

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:00:00PM +, endo.hirofumi wrote: > This is the main topic, but please check the EOS and EOL of the following > products provided by your project. > Could you please give me some guidance? > *If it has not been published, please reply to that effect. > > > Debian

[Confirmation request] Regarding EOS/EOL of Debian OS (as of October 2023)

PM To: webad...@debian.or.jp Cc: svop Subject: RE: 【ご確認依頼】Debian OSのEOS/EOLについて（2023/09時点） Debian Project ご担当者様 いつもお世話になっております。 日商エレクトロニクス 遠藤でございます。 本件、ご確認の状況は如何でしょうか。 お手数とは存じますが、今後とも貴社製品を有効的に利用させていただく為にも ご教示いただきたく存じます。 以上、宜しくお願い致します。 遠藤 -Original Message- From: endo.hirofumi Sent

Re: Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 1:46 PM Ravi Dwivedi wrote: > Since the below mentioned analysis of Debian's security, and that too > compared to other distros, is not very well-known outside of Debian > project honestly i don't believe it's even widely known *in* the debian project [quite how damn

Re:Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

Since the below mentioned analysis of Debian's security, and that too compared to other distros, is not very well-known outside of Debian project(it didn't come up in any internet searches, the web of trust gets mentioned but there is not much explanation on it), I suggest writing in somewhere

Re: OS

On Sat, 2022-06-25 at 19:45 +, SHIN LING wrote: > I can't get pass the debian login screen. Please ask for help using Debian on our support channels: https://www.debian.org/support -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

> they get one and only one chance to do something that stupid. So the answer is that we have no way of preventing a developer from intentionally sabotaging a package in any / as many ways as they choose and the only risk to them is losing their uploader access after the fact? >the response is

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 7:59 PM Adam McKenna wrote: > You are talking about a deterrent though. I think the question is, > what if someone cares more about their political cause than > retaining their uploader access? they get one and only one chance to do something that stupid. > What if

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

> anyone stupid enough to abuse their position may only do so once, at which point their GPG key is revoked. You are talking about a deterrent though. I think the question is, what if someone cares more about their political cause than retaining their uploader access? What if someone's keys are

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

> i believe the answer is in the question. debian is based on distributed trust. i did the analysis (took 3 weeks): it is literally the only distro in the world with an inviolate chain of trust from a large keyring dating back 20 years that is itself GPG-signed as a package, with a package

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

> i did the analysis (took 3 weeks) Do you have a publication of that analysis? I was thinking the same about the organization of Debian for some time but never did analysis or compared it to other distros. Also I like to add that reproducible builds are an excellent addition to the mechanisms

Re: Using Debian OS to bundle and sell our product

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:37 PM Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > > I'm Kamalakannan from Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd. We build cloud > > apps and we have a plan to bundle our application in a laptop with debian > > OS and sell it to custmers with our product bundle over debi

Re: Using Debian OS to bundle and sell our product

Hello Kamal, > I'm Kamalakannan from Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd. We build cloud apps > and we have a plan to bundle our application in a laptop with debian OS and > sell it to custmers with our product bundle over debian OS. > We want to know whether it is allowed as per debi

Using Debian OS to bundle and sell our product

Hi Debian Team,          I'm Kamalakannan from Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd. We build cloud apps and we have a plan to bundle our application in a laptop with debian OS and sell it to custmers with our product bundle over debian OS.  We want to know whether it is allowed as per debian's license

Re: Using Debian OS on a custom commercial device

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:31 AM Sam Hartman wrote: > License compliance is a complex field and for any mass-produced > commercial product you're going to need to retain the services of a > professional qualified in that field to succeed. Nevertheless, there are resources available to help you

Re: Using Debian OS on a custom commercial device

You are of course welcome to download Debian and use it under the conditions of the licenses for the various components of Debian. License compliance is a complex field and for any mass-produced commercial product you're going to need to retain the services of a professional qualified in that

Using Debian OS on a custom commercial device

Greetings, I am currently working on my design of an electronic device and I like Debian because of its security and other things, and I wanted to use it on my device, how do I get a copy of it? Is it free? The electronic will be for sale and of course it will be massively produced. Or Open

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

Wysłano z mojego smartfona Samsung Galaxy.

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

> "Thomas" == Thomas Goirand writes: Thomas> On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote: >> The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to >> explicitly require keeping bugs open because they exist in >> practice -- but common sense and decades of precedent

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:08:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing spells things out nicely > right at the start. I can understand tolerating hard cases with difficult > packages, but we should not advocate a degradation of the golden standard > because of

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:49:57PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote: > > The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly > > require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense > > and decades of precedent

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I very much don't agree with the above. It is useless to keep bugs open > if they are not actionable. Bugs are reminders for the maintainers of > what they should do. If they can't do anything, then it goes on the way > to do useful things, and it is

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote: > The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly > require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense > and decades of precedent do. I very much don't agree with the above. It is useless to keep bugs

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 23:19 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Yet, this isn't one, as I've long given up on expecting that upgrade path to > be fixed - I've reverted to arguing simply that if there's a piece of > functionality (Unix extensions) in the software, the documentation for the > software

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:39:34PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > We simply don't have the resources to manage the tasks you suggest I'm saying one shouldn't send a message to n-close@bugs.d.o and instead just keep an existing bug open. That change alone actually conserves resources. Sending

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote: > The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly > require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense > and decades of precedent do. > > Or is this some new thing that we're now doing, am I

Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:41:39AM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > How does that make sense? If the option is called "do X", and fails to > > do X in some opaque circumstances, how is that not a bug? At the very > > very least, it needs to be explained somewhere. Last I checked, there > > was

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > The use of a live-cd wouldn't work, simply because we also may want to > certify heterogeneous hardware (think about your USB missile launcher > example). Therefore, a general case live-cd will not cover all cases. In > such cases,

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

ould have to ask our TOs if they can do this on our behalf. The legal entity granting the use of the log would be SPI. Therefore, SPI could have this role. > Debian > itself doesn't get improved when $giantserver is tested and shown to > run perfectly. The OS / project probably not. Though

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

ept it will not have wi-fi. If all those blobs (that don't stop Debian main being perfectly usable) are the issue here than Debian is not good enough for anything and I think on contrary. Talking more about all the blobs is very helpful of course, but its not something Debian will go and

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > A trustworthy certification report that said "this machine would have > passed the certification, except that the wifi card requires a > separately supplied firmware blob from Debian non-free" would be > extremely useful to many users and

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:32:20PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > A trustworthy certification report that said "this machine would have > passed the certification, except that the wifi card requires a > separately supplied firmware blob from Debian non-free" would be > extremely useful to many users

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > I would be in favour of asking for payment. I think only optional donations are acceptable, I've written a few mails upthread about that. > The work of actually doing the testing is tedious. If we think people > should be doing that, they

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

Paul Wise writes ("Re: If Debian support OS certification?"): > For Debian I expect your proposal "do not require loading externally > supplied non-free firmware" is something that most of Debian can agree > is a reasonable endorsement target for now. Yes. I thi

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

Paul Wise writes ("Re: If Debian support OS certification?"): > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > If we made such a decision, I'd be very supportive of it. We could make > > it in a "soft" way, ie tell that we accept some kind

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I wonder what you call "everything". In the majority of the servers on > which I have installed Debian, no non-free firmware were required. That would be surprising to me, I imagine every one of those servers was running non-free

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > If we made such a decision, I'd be very supportive of it. We could make > it in a "soft" way, ie tell that we accept some kind of (re-occurring?) > sponsorship, and providing a range of acceptable payment. We could make > such payment not

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On 05/04/2017 01:56 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> No, they should not, otherwise this certification becomes meaningless. > > I see these certifications primarily as a service to Debian users and > not as endorsements of vendors, but as

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On 05/06/2017 03:54 AM, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:40:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 16:54 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 05/02/2017 02:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: With my DSA hat on, we don't like being guinea pigs for development

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I am not sure if this got a page added. I didn't add one, so I think yours is the first. > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Certification I've renamed the page into the Hardware/ namespace and made minor fixes:

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 08:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > What they are interested about, is having *us*, Debian, to certify that > > > their hardware work on our system, so that their customer trust they > can > > >

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

]] Thomas Goirand > I do believe it'd be a fair way to get free (as in free beer) hardware > for the DSA team. It's up to us to define the terms. It would mean we'd end up with a hodgepodge of different servers from different vendors with no coherent OOB access methods, we'd need to track a lot

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:40:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 16:54 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 05/02/2017 02:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > > With my DSA hat on, we don't like being guinea pigs for development > > > boards and pre-release hardware. This kind of

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 16:54 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/02/2017 02:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > With my DSA hat on, we don't like being guinea pigs for development > > boards and pre-release hardware. This kind of hardware tends to be > > unreliable and require too much hand-holding. That

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On 05/02/2017 02:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > With my DSA hat on, we don't like being guinea pigs for development > boards and pre-release hardware. This kind of hardware tends to be > unreliable and require too much hand-holding. That said, we definitely > welcome hardware sponsorship and partners.

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On 05/02/2017 02:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> While it is nice to answer the way you did, here, Debian is missing yet >> another opportunity that other commercial distro would not. Maybe we >> should have a BoF at debconf Montreal about

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Well I already acknowledged that, didn't I? Yes, I felt like re-stating it. > My concern was that the bar you were setting was so low as to be > useless for distinguishing systems that are well supported by Debian > from those that are not.

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Are you really claiming that systems already shipped with *firmware > included* can't be installed using d-i? That's rather bogus, if so. > Please explain? That was the result of writing mail too early in the morning. -- bye, pabs

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 07:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > No, they should not, otherwise this certification becomes meaningless. > > I see these certifications primarily as a service to Debian users and > not as endorsements of vendors, but

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:56:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> No, they should not, otherwise this certification becomes meaningless. > >I see these certifications primarily as a service to Debian users and >not as endorsements of vendors,

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > No, they should not, otherwise this certification becomes meaningless. I see these certifications primarily as a service to Debian users and not as endorsements of vendors, but as statements of fact. The consequences to users should stated

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

Hello, We developed a very detailed sequence of compatibility and disk and storage stress tests , including nfsv4, to homologate disk and storage systems for government profile and scale IMAP loads on Debian systems. Fio tests carefully modeled Cyrus IMAP real world behaviour at such scale,

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:55 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 23:29 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: [...] > > Like most other Enterprise Linux Distributions, Debian too picks a > > particular kernel (stable- lts) and to some extent also backports > > fixes into it. That makes it a

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 23:29 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > As members, we should come up with a "Certification Policy" guide. Which > should > define what constitutes a particular machine being marked certified. Then a > testsuite could be built accordingly. Sounds good to me, would you mind

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 08:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > What they are interested about, is having *us*, Debian, to certify that > > their hardware work on our system, so that their customer trust they can > > buy it to run Debian. It'd be a bit weird if they were certifying > > themselves. > > I

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:35:07AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > While it is nice to answer the way you did, here, Debian is missing yet > > another opportunity that other commercial distro would not. Maybe we > > should have a BoF at

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> At this time, Debian does not have a formal hardware certification program. > > I forgot to mention that we have experimental service called LAVA for > automated hardware testing using

RE: If Debian support OS certification?

, 2017 8:36 AM To: Eric Lai (賴裕文) Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: If Debian support OS certification? On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > At this time, Debian does not have a formal hardware certification program. I forgot to mention that we have experimental serv

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > At this time, Debian does not have a formal hardware certification program. I forgot to mention that we have experimental service called LAVA for automated hardware testing using Debian. Quanta could create a local hardware lab that would

Re: If Debian support OS certification?

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Eric Lai (賴裕文) wrote: > This is Eric from Quanta Cloud Technology, Taiwan. > I am in charge of server hardware certification. > We would like to know if Debian can perform hardware certification as well. > If support, please advise the process and any document we

If Debian support OS certification?

Hello, This is Eric from Quanta Cloud Technology, Taiwan. I am in charge of server hardware certification. Currently, we have capability of Windows, RHEL, SLES, Ubuntu cert, etc… We would like to know if Debian can perform hardware certification as well. If support, please advise the process

Como Depreciar e Reavaliar os Bens Móveis e Imóveis do Patrimônio Público

APRIMORA TREINAMENTOS Como Depreciar e Reavaliar os Bens Móveis e Imóveis do Patrimônio Público

ECCN for OS

We have a Silicon Mechanics Server with Debian OS that we are shipping to Brazil for a climate experiment. Do you have an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) for your OS so we can get export documents issued by our company. Thanks-John

Re: ECCN for OS

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Archuleta, John A j...@lanl.gov wrote: ECCN https://wiki.debian.org/USExportControl might be your best bet Cheers, Paul -- :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: ECCN for OS

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:51:06PM +, Archuleta, John A wrote: We have a Silicon Mechanics Server with Debian OS that we are shipping to Brazil for a climate experiment. Do you have an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) for your OS so we can get export documents issued by our

Curso Leilões de Imóveis, Desvendando os Segredos e Obtendo Lucros - Nova Turma

Caso não esteja visualizando este e-mail, clique aqui (http://uinewsletter.com.br/lt.php?c=720m=717nl=7s=c40d39b2bb1b6f3d6fbf75156f5b117clid=27857l=-http--www.investeducar.com.br/) Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se cadastrou em nosso site com o email debian-project@lists.debian.org.

development of Debian OS

Dear Sir, I am the user of Debian for the past one year. I feel great for using the Debian OS and i have so many doubts on these GNU/Linux Operating Systems. Why it was unable to compete with Microsoft and that's not a big deal for you to popularise the linux to the outside world

Re: development of Debian OS

Hello, On 11/25/2011 03:04 PM, Bhaskar Rao Santa Dimili wrote: I am the user of Debian for the past one year. I feel great for using the Debian OS and i have so many doubts on these GNU/Linux Operating Systems. Why it was unable to compete with Microsoft and that's not a big deal

Re: Thanks for a great OS!

Alek Mosingiewicz dijo [Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:00:54PM +0100]: Hello, I just want to say thanks for Debian. I've decided to switch systems after my Windows 7 distribution, shipped with the Lenovo laptop, suddenly stopped responding to my input (and persisted in this behavior even

Thanks for a great OS!

Hello, I just want to say thanks for Debian. I've decided to switch systems after my Windows 7 distribution, shipped with the Lenovo laptop, suddenly stopped responding to my input (and persisted in this behavior even though I've restarted the system several times), and decided it's the

RE: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

imagination at work -Original Message- From: Yves-Alexis Perez [mailto:cor...@debian.org] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:04 PM To: debian-project@lists.debian.org Cc: Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare, consultant) Subject: Re: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent On mar., 2011-01-11 at 15:58 +0100, Yves

Re: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

On mar., 2011-01-11 at 15:58 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: (with my ANSSI hat on) On mar., 2011-01-11 at 10:32 +0100, Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote: Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I work for GEHC buys the software containing the following encryption mean :

Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I work for GEHC buys the software containing the following encryption mean : Debian Linux. I would like to check with you if this encryption mean have already been declared to the French authorities (ANSSI). If yes, could you please provide me with the ANSSI

Re: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

Bonjour, Debian Linux est un système d'exploitation au même titre que Windows XP ou Vista, pas un moyen de cryptage comme je crois le comprendre dans votre message. Cordialement Le 11/01/2011 10:32, Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare, consultant) a écrit : Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I

Re: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

(with my ANSSI hat on) On mar., 2011-01-11 at 10:32 +0100, Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote: Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I work for GEHC buys the software containing the following encryption mean : Debian Linux. I would like to check with you if this encryption mean

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

without reading or saving. Thank you. Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote on 2009/09/04 21:29:23: Hi Nakayama-san, On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:10:36PM +0900, Fumiharu Nakayama wrote: Dear Debian Project, My name is Harry Nakayama worked w/ TOSHIBA TEC Corporation in Japan. Now we

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:00:13PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:29:23PM +0900, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: PS: It will be nice to have some page for these issues on our web so these FAQ can be addressed properly without making us liable. Translated

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

Hi, In light of recent event http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/08/msg00359.html I have created wiki page to address FAQ on U.S. Export Control. http://wiki.debian.org/USExportControl Please help improve this page. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

Hi Nakayama-san, On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:10:36PM +0900, Fumiharu Nakayama wrote: Dear Debian Project, My name is Harry Nakayama worked w/ TOSHIBA TEC Corporation in Japan. Now we are researching Debian OS Export control policy from Debian project FAQ or others. But we cannot made

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:29:23PM +0900, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: PS: It will be nice to have some page for these issues on our web so these FAQ can be addressed properly without making us liable. Translated in various languages would be a nice addition. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Export Control of Debian OS

Dear Debian Project, My name is Harry Nakayama worked w/ TOSHIBA TEC Corporation in Japan. Now we are researching Debian OS Export control policy from Debian project FAQ or others. But we cannot made it so far. So, we need your support/help in this regards. Would you please tell me if you have

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

[Please post follow-ups to the list, I am subscribed] 2009/9/3 Fumiharu Nakayama fumiharu_nakay...@toshibatec.co.jp: Dear Debian Project, My name is Harry Nakayama worked w/ TOSHIBA TEC Corporation in Japan. Now we are researching Debian OS Export control policy from Debian project FAQ

Re: Debian OS webmaster feedback

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:36 +0100, Chris Reynolds wrote: Would it be possible for us to make the sponsorship payments in exchange for an appreciation sentence/link back to us? If so then how much do you think is a fair price for our support? We can consider doing this as installments for 6

Re: Debian OS webmaster feedback

. Thanks, Chris R. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Chris Reynolds ch...@webhostingsearch.com wrote: Would it be possible for us to become official sponsors for your Debian OS? We are currently trying to promote websites within our niche to support them during the global recession and hence

Re: Debian OS webmaster feedback

Well you sure got a very wrong idea of who I am. No, I am not a spammer and had no intentions of sounding like spam. I did go through the links but unfortunately we did not intend to become a mirror for your software or a developer. Never mind, I am sorry for causing noise to Debian-project.

Debian OS webmaster feedback

Hello Guys, Would it be possible for us to become official sponsors for your Debian OS? We are currently trying to promote websites within our niche to support them during the global recession and hence I thought it might be an interesting opportunity for us to partner up and support your work

Re: Debian OS webmaster feedback

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Chris Reynolds ch...@webhostingsearch.com wrote: Would it be possible for us to become official sponsors for your Debian OS? We are currently trying to promote websites within our niche to support them during the global recession and hence I thought it might

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

Henning Makholm wrote: As a random data point, take DSA-1116 (a buffer overrun with no known exploit, in a quite popular piece of desktop software), where I happen to have a timeline: July 1 - reported privately to security team, with patch July 6 - bug goes public through upstream's BTS,

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:17:39PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I am holding in my hands the 09/06 copy of the German Linux Magazin, and on page 76, opensourcefactory.com has advertised Open/OS Corporate Linux [0], which apparently makes Debian mature. While I applaud their efforts and I

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.29.2310 +0200]: July 6 - bug goes public through upstream's BTS, Debian bug filed July 21 - fixed in sarge, DSA released I know this is a ridiculous time span, but

Reduce security release latency - Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.29.2310 +0200]: We also shouldn't fool ourselves into thinking that a commercial repackager with a real dedication to security support (say, by hiring a handful of

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

also sprach Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.30.0236 +0100]: Perhaps ask them kindly to either contribute their work back to Debian, or stop using Debian in their advertising and packaging. This is what I was thinking about. However, is it what we want? After all, I think we *want* them

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

martin f krafft wrote: and since their ad is entitled Debian of full age, it kind of suggests that Debian per se is immature, a child, an assertion I'd strongly oppose. I can't see the 'Debian of full age' thing, I am not very fluent in German but I can't see any reference to this statement.

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

also sprach Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.30.1048 +0100]: I can't see the 'Debian of full age' thing, I am not very fluent in German but I can't see any reference to this statement. The title: Debian volljährig! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!

Re: Reduce security release latency - Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Alexander Sack wrote: Of course, we don't want to have 2nd class architectures, but waiting for architectures to finish that are used only by a minority looks flawed either. Especially if there is a buildd breakage involved. Zero tolerance for buildd breakage should be a

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am holding in my hands the 09/06 copy of the German Linux Magazin, and on page 76, opensourcefactory.com has advertised Open/OS Corporate Linux [0], which apparently makes Debian mature. [...] I'd be interested in what people think. Am I just

Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

martin f krafft wrote: and that they add support and maintenance, which adds the features - reliable release cycle - newest packages - security team - security administration Their latest security update is from February... Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?

Hi, I am holding in my hands the 09/06 copy of the German Linux Magazin, and on page 76, opensourcefactory.com has advertised Open/OS Corporate Linux [0], which apparently makes Debian mature. 0. http://www.open-os.com/cms/index.php?page=Home It calls our distro reliable and secure and states

  1   2   >