of disciplinary process, please
just go ahead and do it, don't beat about the bush.
Anyone who wants to put their name to explicitly racist, sexist and
pro-nazi material in Debian is free to re-upload it.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am
uot;maintainers team"
which I take to mean any package maintainer.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:36:34AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Other early steps should include establishing a sub-project/group to
coordinate discussion and actions around the issue.
I still think this. Perhaps starting with a dedicated mailing list;
debian-sustainability or debian-climate
.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
s yourself, pop up from time to time, so we
can know that you are still around. I hope life is treating you well.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
is committed to
making this happen.
Makes sense to me.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
delegated responsibility to
do this?
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
hat in the wake of the init system decision. And in my opinion, your
more recent mailing lists contributions to Debian have not been as
valuable as ones from the past: case in point, this thread. We're raking
over old coals here, and it's not helping you, or Debian.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ J
verloading it a bit too much.
I'm not sure that would necessarily be helpful. The URI (being
externally managed) would not be guaranteed to continue to serve the
same content at a later date.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am
arrassment team.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
s. Having said that,
I appreciate the robust discussion in this thread and there's definitely more
refinement to do.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
, if we so wish?
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
The former can be inferred from the wiki page history.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:16:21AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> To that end I sat down just now to create it. Unfortunately wiki.d.o appears
> to have died whilst I was doing so.
Here's the wiki page : https://wiki.debian.org/RegisterOfInterests
ian.
>
> || '''User''' || '''Interest''' || '''From''' || '''Until''' ||
> || JonDowland || Red Hat || 2015 || - ||
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
ing your own planet. Such a thing
could even be linked to from p.d.o or elsewhere in the Debian-web. So far nobody
has opted to do so.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:08:04AM -0300, Daniel Lucena wrote:
I would like know if between download images of Debian 8 (after
became stable) the Mate Desktop Environment will be available or i
need install Debian NetInstall and after install Mate packages with
aptitude?
This type of
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:49:28PM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 14/10/2014 11:58 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Isn't the point of posting on debian-devel-announce to increase the
visibility and liklihood of seconds in the first place?
Not if you want to help avoid the GR having a chance
document it as a should in policy, although there may
not yet be an appropriate section to do so.
Does anyone have strong feelings on this?
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 05:03:07PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Why do you believe repacking upstream tarball should be the default
behavior (especially when, as already pointed before, “You *should*
upload packages with a pristine source tarball if possible”)?
I don't suppose I'll have much
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:27:58AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
On the other hand, it defeats the principle of least surprise.
Distributing a different upstream tarball in Debian than upstream, just
because, seems plain wrong. Even the dev-ref agrees: “You *should*
upload packages with a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:51:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just for the sake of interest: Is there any reason not to use uscan?
(I hope the answer will not be since I need to remove files from
upstream source.)
This wouldn't help those not using uscan, of which I am one, but what about
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:27:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Nothing says a pure blend couldn't have its own public identity, and if they
were a pure blend, I would have no concern about the expenditure. But since
it's a derivative rather than a pure blend, how do we know that in /this/
On 5 Apr 2014, at 00:18, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
Well, please enlighten me here: Without fully auditing the Javascript
code you are using to do the crypto client-side, can you *really* be
certain your private half has not travelled to Keybase?
The client side crypto stuff can't
keybase.io is a thing. This thing lets you, amongst other things, upload a copy
of your PGP private key to their servers. This is client-side encrypted.
Discuss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:07:17PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Consequently, any GR about init-related issues would now need to
explicity state that it upholds the CTTE's decision for the default
init system. Lacking that, passing of the GR would, as a *side-effect*
nullify the CT decision
://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/03/msg00064.html
Some are of no use without the context of the crap. Some are of no use
anyway. Others are less clear.
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:28:39PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Personally I think it would bring some much needed transparency to
what is becoming one of the more essential Debian communication
channels to be on. Just like we archive mailing lists and record
DebConf talks/BoFs, we should publicly
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op dinsdag 25 februari 2014 19:02:49 schreef Lars Wirzenius:
I would prefer a culture where IRC discussions are ephemeral, and any
useful information should end up in debian/changelog, mailing lists,
git commit messages,
On 10/02/2014 17:26, Daniel Pocock wrote:
http://www.itwire.com
snip
Not really objective journalism
The byline alone is enough to deduce this. Let's not feed the trolls.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
This is a great email, Wouter.
Thanks for your perseverance!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1045392-ec03-41ee-b50f-f43b57282...@debian.org
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:56:37PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Seems as though Joey is already taking the lead on this:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debmirror.git;a=commitdiff;h=fcd972395b0201fcde4915d282982926f0d04c56;hp=7fcdf0d225c480b386c5a1f487e68dc39b57e771
Urgh,
Joking aside, we do occasionally have high visibility, low severity
bugs in this ballpark, like #666869 (which is thankfully resolved
and hopefully will be backported to a stable point release) as
a result of personalisation in Ubuntu leaking back downstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:07:33PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Can we produce a minimal netinst which does just this
for a default install and adds desktop selection
for an expert install.
How does the current netinst not qualify? You have to select
Desktop Environment on the tasksel
My feeling before reading this thread was that bans should be accessible
to DDs somewhere but this thread has convinced me that they should be
made public. I think bans should be time-limited in almost all cases,
with perma-bans being very rare indeed. I don't think that ban durations
should be
Thanks for your hard work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131103140708.gd9...@bryant.redmars.org
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:38:31AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Please don't switch bugs.debian.org away from debbugs. I don't want to
have to leave the Debian project but some misguided folks doing that
would be one of the triggers for that.
Please don't threaten/ransom your labour to push one or
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:21:50PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I assume Asheesh generated
the newer key to have the same ID as the older – not nice…
Yes, http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/short-key-ids-are-bad-news.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:37:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ah, I hadn't ever thought about it from that angle. Basically, the
argument is that if there's no original creative addition, it can't be a
derivative work? On first glance, 17 U.S.C. § 101 appears to support
that:
Eek. What
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The most annoying reply behaviour I see is people replying to one list
rather than the multiple lists I sent the original message to. We
should encourage use of Reply-to-all instead, as erring on the side of
inclusion is safer
Thanks, Wouter.
First: would it be appropriate for there to be a point about context-quoting,
or inline quoting, or more precicely not either top-posting nor bottom posting
with no trimming? (my phrasing is bad.)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:52:42AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
6. You should
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:04:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I wonder if just using the same forum is a good idea, or if it would be
better to create a separate contributor-focused platform.
One thing I find attractive about using the platform for both is to perhaps
help encourage/promote the
44 matches
Mail list logo
