On 2020-08-14 at 20:27 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Seems we are talking about several things here:
>
> a) trusting an identity _without_ relying on governmental proof
>
> b) proving an identity using fake governmental proof
>
> It is my understanding that a) is illegal and punishable in
o other countries through ePassport.
Probably "fun" to make it work (both the client and the verification
part), but a PGP key cryptographically linked to the Government PKI
would be more than a DD looking at a passport.
Best regards
Ángel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2020-08-13 at 17:57 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 02:59:59AM +0200, Ángel wrote:
> > as there would be an external motivation to do that which is financing
> > such activity. Please note that by 'company' I am not meaning just
> > business entities,
ameter, he should do exactly the same as if he signed Eve key while
intending to sing Alice's: revoke the wrong signature and create a new
one.
Regards
Ángel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Dominik
On 2023-08-30 at 11:04 +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > On 2023-08-21 at 17:00 +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > > But, I want to go one step further and think about who is invited
> > > to do what. If *some* people are invited to contribute through
> > > the
> > > VCS, and others are
On 2023-08-21 at 16:37 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2023-08-21 17:00:04 +0200 (+0200), Dominik George wrote:
> [...]
> > A concrete implementation for GitHub repositories would be to
> > disable issues and PRs
> [...]
>
> As an aside, unless something has changed very recently, GH does not
>
Hi Dominik
You proposal looked reasonable, yet at the same time something seemed
to be off.
After some pondering, I think it may be going for the wrong problem.
On 2023-08-21 at 17:00 +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> But, I want to go one step further and think about who is invited to
> do
7 matches
Mail list logo
