Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't think the new packages were using alternatives?
This is the first thing I checked:
chinon:~$ ls -al /usr/bin/python
lrwxr-xr-x1 root root 24 oct 16 12:14 /usr/bin/python -
/etc/alternatives/python
I discovered that
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/python-doc$ dpkg -L python-doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/python-doc
/usr/share/doc/python-doc/copyright
/usr/share/doc/python-doc/changelog.Debian.gz
--
Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix
Danie Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/python-doc$ dpkg -L python-doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/python-doc
/usr/share/doc/python-doc/copyright
/usr/share/doc/python-doc/changelog.Debian.gz
It seems that you've never followed the list.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:43:21AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
It seems that you've never followed the list.
$ dpkg -L python1.5-doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/python1.5
/usr/share/doc/python1.5/html
/usr/share/doc/python1.5/html/index.html
At some point, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++),
I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this:
assuming there aren't any critical bugs.
is one of the questions I want an anwser to here.
Personally I've never even
On Oct 17, Matthias Klose wrote:
With the last python-1.5.2-18.2 NMU we have non-conflicting python1.5,
2.0 and 2.1 packages in unstable, not more not less.
Here two proposals, how to go further on. The first proposal is a
safer proposal (but needs more uploads and needs loong). The second
6 matches
Mail list logo