Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com (17/12/2009):
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If
we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing
transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 at 12:50:24 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FWIW, here are some FTBFSes I've reported lately, which look due to
this transition:
[...]
... and for those who care about FTBFSs, the binNMUs of pygtk are also all
failing (either due to #548211 or not waiting for python2.6-gobject
Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com (17/12/2009):
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If
we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing
transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload
On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Scott Kittermandeb...@kitterman.com (17/12/2009):
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If
we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Scott Kittermandeb...@kitterman.com (17/12/2009):
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If
we finish preparations in the next week, are
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Elliot Murphy ell...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Dear mentors and python-module-packagers,
I joined the team recently, injected my package into svn, and have now
uploaded it to mentors. The package looks lintian-clean, and my test
installations have worked OK. I'll
Hi!
Zooko (the upstream developer) filed #567145 asking for
python-foolscap to be updated to the new 0.5.0 release.
I have committed a new changelog entry for this, test built and
installed a package using svn-buildpackage after running
get-orig-source to obtain a correctly modified tarball, and
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
Today I have switched python-whisper to use python-support instead of
python-central
[…]
Be aware that, for an package that was *already* in Debian, you would
need to modify your maintainer scripts to clean up after the mess left
by ‘python-central’
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
I've added foolscap to the /topic in #debian-python
That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
for the whole channel, rather than just communicating as an individual
asking for assistance?
but I didn't know where to say
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
for the whole channel, rather than just communicating as an individual
asking for assistance?
It's rather obnoxious to assume I didn't
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
I've added foolscap to the /topic in #debian-python
That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
for the whole channel, rather than just
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.0+dfsg-1
of my package foolscap.
It builds these binary packages:
python-foolscap - object-capability-based RPC system for Twisted Python
The upload would fix these bugs: 567145
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
-
Tristan Seligmann mithra...@mithrandi.net writes:
Are you even in the channel?
Often, yes.
The topic of the channel seems like a perfectly reasonable place for
this kind of list, too, so I'm not sure why you object to it so
strongly.
I would think a separate task tracker would be more
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
It's rather obnoxious to assume I didn't communicate as an individual
asking for assistance. When I did that, jwilk told me to add the
package to the list of packages in the topic waiting to be reviewed,
as is the standard operating procedure for the
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I would think a separate task tracker would be more appropriate; the
channel topic should remain primarily descriptive of the topic of the
channel, after all.
I'd strongly suggest the use of PET (package entropy
Thanks for that pointer. I have a couple packages that I need to convert
which were already published in other archives, so this is very handy.
(Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).
--
Elliot Murphy | https://launchad.net/~statik/
On Jan 28, 2010 6:48 PM, Ben
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
(Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).
I wonder why people who use Android keep on doing this an apologising
for it, instead of the far superior options:
* don't use Android, and/or
* agitate for this Android bug to be
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:
(Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).
I wonder why people who use Android keep on doing this an apologising
for it, instead of the far superior options:
* don't use Android, and/or
* agitate for this Android bug to
18 matches
Mail list logo
