Re: Updating the Python Modules *Team* policy

Hi, My merge request already incorporates what Nicolas proposed, So, I think that would mean both "replacing" and "in addition to" since my changeset is a superset to the previous one. The other changes are listed in my previous email. On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:45:15AM -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:

Re: Updating the Python Modules *Team* policy

Yao Wei, > I am proposing another merge request: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/2 Another in the sense of "replacing" or "in addition to" the one Nicolas already proposed we merge? (If the former, how is it superior?) Regards, -- ,''`.

Re: Updating the Python Modules *Team* policy

Hi, I am proposing another merge request: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/2 Prominent changes are follows: * Change git repo from Alioth to Salsa * Suggests to use git-buildpackage and quilt format instead of git-dpm - Some unrelevant paragraphs

Re: Updating the Python Modules *Team* policy

Hi Nicolas, > I feel the consensus is that that PR should just get merged and that the DPMT > policy can just be updated by team consensus on this list. Consider this a > heads up that I'll merge this in the next few days, unless there's any issue > people can come up with. Great idea. Indeed,

Re: Allow installation on buster of a package not supporting 3.7 (async/await syntax error when generating bytecode)

Hi! * Adam Cécile [2018-11-08 09:15:59 +0100]: > Hello list, > > > I have a package working perfectly fine on Pyrhon 3.6 but using async/await > methods so it cannot work on python 3.7 at the moment. > During package compilation, I popd 3.7 from supported version returned by > py3version and

Updating the Python Modules *Team* policy

[ I'm *not* talking about the Python "packaging" Policy[0], which is under the prerogative of the python{,3}-defaults maintainers. [0] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ ] Dear all, The DPMT policy[1] is still talking about Alioth and git-dpm, which is ever so slightly

Re: [Salsa] DPMT Join Request from @mwei

Hi Yao Wei, > 1. We are now using Salsa but the policy remains in Alioth. > > 2. We are probably not preferring using git-dpm but gbp + quilt right > now. (not sure about this though: I was doing git-dpm in a Python > package maintained outside Python teams but another DD told me that I >

Re: pytest 3.9.3 in experimental

Roger That El jue., 8 de nov. de 2018 a la(s) 06:09, Ondrej Novy (n...@ondrej.org) escribió: > Hi, > > I uploaded pytest version 3.9.3 into experimental. Please test it with > your packages and report me any issues. If there will be no issues I will > upload it into unstable after ~2 weeks from

Re: [Salsa] DPMT Join Request from @mwei

Hi, I read the policy, but I found several questions about it. 1. We are now using Salsa but the policy remains in Alioth. 2. We are probably not preferring using git-dpm but gbp + quilt right now. (not sure about this though: I was doing git-dpm in a Python package maintained outside Python

Re: [Salsa] DPMT Join Request from @mwei

Hi, so 3. 11. 2018 v 1:37 odesílatel Yao Wei napsal: > As stated in the bug #912656 (which the first email is also CC'd to this > mailing list), I would like to join the DPMT team, for uploading > python-fs package for py2 and py3. > did you read our policy (

Re: [salsa] please add me as member of DMPT

Hi, st 7. 11. 2018 v 6:54 odesílatel Samuel Henrique napsal: > Sorry, I switched groups, I need access to the PAPT group, I'm already > part of the DPMT one. > added. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

Re: DPMT: join request

Hi, st 31. 10. 2018 v 14:51 odesílatel Stewart Ferguson napsal: > I'd like to join the DPMT team. > welcome. :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

pytest 3.9.3 in experimental

Hi, I uploaded pytest version 3.9.3 into experimental. Please test it with your packages and report me any issues. If there will be no issues I will upload it into unstable after ~2 weeks from now. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090

Allow installation on buster of a package not supporting 3.7 (async/await syntax error when generating bytecode)

Hello list, I have a package working perfectly fine on Pyrhon 3.6 but using async/await methods so it cannot work on python 3.7 at the moment. During package compilation, I popd 3.7 from supported version returned by py3version and it allows me to build the package just fine: Problem: I