Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Adam Hupp wrote...
> > - disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
> > anything by default unless you run python with the warning enabled
> > (-Wd), but until there's a clear plan for the future of this package
> > it
Adam Hupp wrote...
> Whew, I was worried for a moment :) I've pushed an update to the
> branch
Great to see.
> Changes:
> - disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
> anything by default unless you run python with the warning enabled
> (-Wd), but until there's a clear plan
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> I found
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends python-magic
(...)
Yeah, I already had checked a few of them where possible with little
efforts. These were the test I had been talking of (actually, including
python3-magic rdeps as well).
> May be we should signal them explicitely to
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Hence, here is a preliminary packaging of python-magic for Debian:
>
>
> https://www.in-ulm.de/~cbiedl/debian/python-magic/python-magic_0.4.15-1~exp1.dsc
>
> Debianites, please give it a try.
No reaction of any kind, so just uploaded to experimen
From the popular series "Leaving fatal mistakes in spite of
proof-reading three times":
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Doing a first round of tests showed
no
> regressions so far.
You may st
t in Debian, I expect this transition to take two years anyway.
Cheers,
Christoph
Subject: Make the deprecation warning switchable
Author: Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Date: 2018-01-08
Forwarded: soon
--- a/magic/__init__.py
+++ b/magic/__init__.py
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
impo
[
It's getting rather Debian specific, so trimming recipicient list.
I'd prefer to discuss this on debian-python but keep me in Cc:,
thanks.
]
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> while approaching the test for relatorio I got aware, that the result won't be
> very significant, because
[ I'm not lost, just way too occupied with other issues, sorry ]
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
> 08:34:04 +0200):
>
> > In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to
>
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
+1
In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to
package) for Adam's python-magic as https://bugs.debian.org/877849
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
* Package name: python-magic
Version : 0.4.13
Upstream Author : Adam Hupp <a...@hupp.org>
* URL : https://github.com/ahupp/python-magic/
* License : MIT
Prog
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual release
> of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next release of Tryton).
> For
> now there is only one usage of python-magic[6], so probably best to patch
> relatorio for now to use
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017
> 19:38:56 +0200):
> > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both upstreams together and
> > ask them to reconcile the APIs and eventually make one of
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
(...)
> OTOH the package providing python-magic on PyPi[3] is provided by another
> Upstream[4].
... and I assume the APIs are not identical?
> The cleanest solution for me would look like
> -
13 matches
Mail list logo
