. in enchant/_enchant.py
and would try libenchant.so.1 and fall back to libenchant.so.0).
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
the module name doens't allow so (underscores for instance).
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009, Jakub Wilk wrote:
+ versions explicitely.
You could fix that typo if you are at it.
Thanks; I've spell checked the whole document and came up with the
attached patch, Spell check fixes.
--
Loïc Minier
From ee2c89e0b24b2deff74ad35d59a8ca4a9f936ecf Mon Sep 17 00:00
via deps.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the
consequences of the change...
How about the new attached patch, Require the python- prefix for
public modules?
--
Loïc Minier
From 95d0258fb8513078ccb3eb496a7867c16de4f747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lo=C3=AFc=20Minier?= l...@dooz.org
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:00:24 +0100
Subject
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Looks fine to me, but 3.1 needs to be updated too since it currently says
that a
package that needs `foo' must depend on `python-foo', which may not be correct
anymore with this patch.
Ack
--
Loïc Minier
From
attached
--
Loïc Minier
From b4764801ece55036695e6d380ee5732986a0bf56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lo=C3=AFc=20Minier?= l...@dooz.org
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:13:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 26/30] Clarify which files are provided
Clarify that pythonX.Y provides a /usr/bin/pythonX.Y
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/12/9 Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Where is this git repository hosted? Or where can I get the current
version of the policy as seen on the debian.org website?
Concerning the Python Policy
of the python-defaults
package (which I found in the morgue) and committed the proposed
changes on top of that. I can provide a copy of the repo to you, but
it's not in any way an official repo for the python-defaults package or
the policy.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Precisely. TTBOMK no other VCS is as smooth to operate as subversion
*for Debian packages*. Only svn-buildpackage can handle correctly the
versioning of the debian/ directory alone.
bzr bd works fine in this mode; did you try it out?
--
Loïc
, fwiw, is to stay with svn until we have a documented, accessible
workflow with tool support.
Fair point.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the changes in /unstable and
upload the 0.5 tree in experimental for now? Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maintainer: are
usually better maintained than team maintained ones; this might be
because the team is underpowered, but then having individual
Maintainers: didn't prevent any pkg-gnome-wide changes to happen...
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
simply rely
on them being installed on your machine and run the testsuite but
ignore failures:
run_testsuite || true
but generally packages have the bdeps for the testsuite they run.
Also, make sure you honor nocheck in DEB_BUILD_OPTS.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-rc4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Loïc Minier
'
get_rgba_colormap was added in pygtk 2.9.0. You might want to request
the exact requirements of your script to his provider.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a backport or build it yourself.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like debian ;)
It's in python-gnome2-desktop.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: meaningful in the case of inter-module
dependencies, as discussed at Debconf;
* fixes to the erroneous python-support section.
Looks good; this obviously implies that python-central will need to
match the new dependency functionalities.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, python2.5-gtk2.
This will fail to bring a python2.5-gobject implementation.
Sure, I do see the problem in this case, but I think it's not very
common. The problem didn't turn up very often with python2.4 for
example.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
not build the 2.5 flavor. Either patch pygtk's debian/rules or
patch pyversions and rebuild pygtk.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
done
(There are also pre- and post-rtupdate hooks, but these are mostly
useful when the default runtime changes.)
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by python-defaults upload to
experimental to list python2.5 as supported as well?
I agree python2.5 is not very useful in itself as is.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if not an absolute
pathname.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006, Ian Ward wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/urwid/urwid_0.9.6-1.dsc
Uploaded. Would be nice to have an upstream ChangeLog.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
and
build it multiple times, solution b) could be to only build for one
version of python.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which has private modules which
are compiled in place (in /usr/lib/flumotion) for the current version
of python on install, and are recompiled on upgrades.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
think the only solution I have is to build for all versions now.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? And why does it conflict with a
python 2.4?
The extension would certainly still work when used from python2.3 after
the switch, and this seems to make upgrades harder.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
/, and its maintainer scripts
didn't seem to have the feature either.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: python-defaults
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
As explained on debian-python@ in the attached message...
Here's a patch.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Python Policy 3.2 states:
3.2 Programs Using a Particular Python Version
of pygtk-2.0-pythonVER.pc?
Perhaps we should introduce a /usr/lib/python/site-packages dir which
always points to /usr/lib/pythonCURRENT/site-packages and make .pc
files reference that?
Or should pyexecdir be dropped from .pc files?
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
It's also possible to influence the PKG_CONFIG_PATH, eg.
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkg-config/python2.3:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH in
debian/rules.
I tried this, and it wasn't too hard except it needed a rtupdate
script to update the symlinks after a default
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers, and following the
discussions in debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the
status of GNOME 1, I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
34 matches
Mail list logo
