Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Mikael Hedin
Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: python_2.1.1 python1.5_1.5.2 zope2.3.3 Why not python-1.5_1.5.2, zope-2.3.3 and similar binary packages? I think this namenumber scheme is ugly and it looks strange. name-version is more clear IMO. These create the following binary

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Carey Evans
Gregor Hoffleit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have you looked at my experimental Python packages, at http://people.debian.org/~flight/python/snapshot/ ? I've had a look at these packages myself. Can you tell us what stage they're at, i.e. what still needs to be done, what problems you know about

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Gregor Hoffleit wrote: Have you looked at my experimental Python packages, at http://people.debian.org/~flight/python/snapshot/ ? I haven't yet tried your packages, but it sounds like you started from scratch ? No, I based them on your python and python2 packages. I've made quite a few bug

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
* Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010906 16:27]: Gregor Hoffleit wrote: Have you looked at my experimental Python packages, at http://people.debian.org/~flight/python/snapshot/ ? I haven't yet tried your packages, but it sounds like you started from scratch ? No, I based them on your

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Bruce Sass wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Neil Schemenauer wrote: Again the package is python-base, not python2.2-base. pydoc depends on python-base_2.1.1 and uses #!/usr/bin/python. I don't see a problem with that. Except you don't know which Python /usr/bin/python is. Please think a

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread dman
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:38:42PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: | Bruce Sass wrote: | On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Neil Schemenauer wrote: | Again the package is python-base, not python2.2-base. pydoc depends on | python-base_2.1.1 and uses #!/usr/bin/python. I don't see a problem | with that. |

Re: Experimental Python packages

2001-09-06 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Neil Schemenauer wrote: Bruce Sass wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Neil Schemenauer wrote: Again the package is python-base, not python2.2-base. pydoc depends on python-base_2.1.1 and uses #!/usr/bin/python. I don't see a problem with that. Except you don't know

Experimental Python packages

2001-09-05 Thread Neil Schemenauer
See here: http://people.debian.org/~nas/woody/ The source packages I have are: python_2.1.1 python1.5_1.5.2 zope2.3.3 These create the following binary packages: python-base python-dev python-elisp python-examples python-gdbm python-mpz