On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:40:02AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote:
If people really need 2.2, then it doesn't need to be the default anyway...
just use the python2.2-foo packages...
Except that a lot of packages only exist as pythonfoo. python-gtk and
pygame come to mind for example.
Just
fre 2002-07-26 klockan 03.31 skrev Donovan Baarda:
If people are using the simple wrapper approach to supporting the default
Python, then switching to 2.2 would just consist of releasing empty wrapper
packages with changed dependancies... pretty easy NMU stuff.
If people are screaming for
Sorry, I've not checked for existing threads on this topic... will Sarge
use Python2.2 by any chance? Once this is decided, the sooner it is made
official, the sooner packages will start updating, and the faster we
will get a stable Sarge...
Specifically, I am wondering if I should go
Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Il gio, 2002-07-25 alle 16:04, Hugo van der Merwe ha scritto:
Sorry, I've not checked for existing threads on this topic... will Sarge
use Python2.2 by any chance? Once this is decided, the sooner it is made
official, the sooner packages will start
On Jul 25, Matthias Klose wrote:
My current plan is:
- upload python2.3 packages soon (when 2.3alpha1 is released)
- remove python1.5 from unstable
- adopt python-central for 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, hopefully with the
help of the author, hint, hint
- upload python2.3 beta to unstable
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 03:28:59PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Jul 25, Matthias Klose wrote:
My current plan is:
- upload python2.3 packages soon (when 2.3alpha1 is released)
- remove python1.5 from unstable
- adopt python-central for 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, hopefully with the
6 matches
Mail list logo
