* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 23:16:
I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
Fix it? :)
the problem is: it looks like I introduced it¹ in the first place :-)
(it was hardcoded to 2.4 before)
Why is that a problem? :)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-py
[Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-15]
> * Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 22:54:
> >I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
>
> Fix it? :)
the problem is: it looks like I introduced it¹ in the first place :-)
(it was hardcoded to 2.4 before)
[¹] in revision 2063
--
Piotr Ożarowski
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 22:54:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-python@lists.debian.org;tag=python:Versions
Thanks!
I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
Fix it? :)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@list
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2012-05-14]
> [Julien Cristau, 2012-05-14]
> > > is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> > > should?)
> >
> > Some grepping in the lintian lab should be able to answer that.
>
> it's not that bad actually, I will report bugs/patches later this
[Julien Cristau, 2012-05-14]
> > is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> > should?)
>
> Some grepping in the lintian lab should be able to answer that.
it's not that bad actually, I will report bugs/patches later this week
apparmor_2.7.103-2_source/debfiles/con
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-14, 12:57:
I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
still generate *:Version substitution variables.
is it safe to drop it?
I wouldn't do that at this point of the release cycle. But after the
wheezy release, it should be harmless.
(i.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:57:17 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-14]
> > I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
> > still generate *:Version substitution variables.
>
> is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> sho
[Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-14]
> I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
> still generate *:Version substitution variables.
is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
should?)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-05-14, 12:22:
Hi there,
I am starring at the following warning:
warning: package python-gdcm: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions}
Ignore the warning.
In the old days you would add "XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}" to
binary package
[CC me pls]
Hi there,
I am starring at the following warning:
warning: package python-gdcm: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions}
My package reads as:
$ cat d/control
Source: gdcm
...
X-Python-Version: 2.7
...
Package: python-gdcm
Section: python
Architecture: any
Depends
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
> Could you please point me to an existing python package that uses dh
> that I can use as an example starting point?
> An example package that handles a pure python modules and an extension
> module would be great.
For properly bundled pure Python one
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mercredi 14 juillet 2010, vers 17:17,
Bernd Zeimetz disait :
I'm working on package that uses CDBS
>>
>>> That's not a very good choice.
>>
>> Why?
> Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of Makefiles. I'm not sure who is
> willing to keep the Python
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:17:37PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet
> > 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk disait :
> >
> >>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS
> >
> >> That's n
Le mercredi 14 juillet 2010 à 17:17 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet
> > 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk disait :
> >
> >>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS
> >
> >> That
On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet
> 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk disait :
>
>>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS
>
>> That's not a very good choice.
>
> Why?
Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet
2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk disait :
>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS
> That's not a very good choice.
Why?
--
printk("VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. "
"Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...\n
l: warning: package python-presage: unused substitution
variable ${python:Versions}
It's safe to ignore this warning.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I'm working on package that uses CDBS and python-support to build a
python extension module.
The package builds fine and works correctly. However, the build reports
the following warning:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package python-presage: unused substitution
variable ${python:Ver
18 matches
Mail list logo
