Re: Python upgrade path (draft/proposal)

2001-10-18 Thread Donovan Baarda
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: With the last python-1.5.2-18.2 NMU we have non-conflicting python1.5, 2.0 and 2.1 packages in unstable, not more not less. Here two proposals, how to go further on. The first proposal is a safer proposal (but needs more uploads and needs loong).

Re: Python upgrade path (draft/proposal)

2001-10-18 Thread Matthias Klose
May I suggest a simpler alternative for (b) (or maybe an alternative c): Make package python-XXX containing support for both python 1.5 and python 2.1. For each python {1.5,2.1} that is installed, bytecompile the package's .py files on install. Since we use

Debian Python policy Upgrade Path (draft/proposal)

2001-10-18 Thread Matthias Klose
[Please CC me on replies] I made a new version of the Debian Python Policy, based on Neil's Python Policy (0.1), the new Python packages in unstable and Donovan's comments on the upgrade procedure. It's appended and available from http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/ (including the sgml source).

Re: Debian Python policy Upgrade Path (draft/proposal)

2001-10-18 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Matthias Klose wrote: At any given time, the package `python-base' should represent the current stable upstream version of Python. XXX: Should we have an exception for the case, when a new upstream version is released during a Debian freeze? It should probably be reworded