Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to remove the remaining warnings from the gdcm/python
package. They can be seen here:
That is pretty normal for plugins on Linux; the symbols are
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to remove the annoying 'todo' section of the gdcm package page:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
If this was a lintian false positive, one would use
*.lintian-overrides file. However in this case I did not know
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
So, ~10 days later this call, we've two volunteers: Sandro and Barry. If
no one else show
Il 03 aprile 2012 10:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org ha scritto:
If you volunteered in #573745 already, and you're still available,
please reiterate your availability here.
I'm willing to help too, but I would limit by doing grunt work such as
bug triaging and cleanup.
I know this kind
* Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-11, 17:43:
[CC me please]
[done]
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/python-gdcm/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/_gdcmswig.so
contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyObject_IsTrue: it's
probably a plugin.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: 86 other
* Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-12, 09:04:
I am trying to remove the annoying 'todo' section of the gdcm package
page:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
If this was a lintian false positive, one would use *.lintian-overrides
file. However in this case I did not know
Jakub,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-11, 17:43:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/python-gdcm/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/_gdcmswig.so
contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyObject_IsTrue: it's
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-12, 09:04:
I am trying to remove the annoying 'todo' section of the gdcm package
page:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
If this was a lintian false positive, one
Hi Paul,
On Apr 12, 2012, at 02:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
A recent review of my package asked me to consider making a python3 version.
Excellent! One more down the road to Python 3 world domination. :)
But the response below says that is difficult. It is several months old, has
this
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:25:07 AM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
So, ~10 days later
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:13:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I will be direct.
Thanks! I really appreciate.
So far, the solicitation has been for co-maintainers with morph. I think it
would only be fair to make a similar call for co-maintainers with doko.
... but hold right there :-)
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 08:30:41 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
Hi Paul,
I'm not sure what you mean by no python3 program to test it. You can and
should create the Python 3 extension modules. `apt-get install python3`
should do the trick, right?
I mean that I have python 2 programs that use
On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 08:30:41 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
Hi Paul,
I'm not sure what you mean by no python3 program to test it. You can and
should create the Python 3 extension modules. `apt-get install python3`
should do the trick,
package.
$ find /usr/lib/pyshared/python2.6/ -name \*.so -exec readelf -d {} \;
| grep SONAME | wc
73 3655333
After all this is a great that it was added to PTS :)
The latest lintian4python (0+20120412) will emit a pedantic tag for
such packages.
BTW, does anybody know how to stop
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:13, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
I don't think that the *-defaults packages and the interpreter packages
fundamentally require the same maintainer, but I expect it to be problematic
to have different teams maintain them if each team has the other as a
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 09:12:23 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:13, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
I don't think that the *-defaults packages and the interpreter packages
fundamentally require the same maintainer, but I expect it to be
problematic to have
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
clarifying what the incompatibilities among the (potential) volunteers
are.
From my side, I don't think i'll have problems working with Barry, but
I honestly have to say we had few occasions to work together (that I
can
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question: Why Ubuntu has Python 2.7.3 since
more than 2 days (even before it was publicly announced) while Debian
is still stuck with a RC,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:50, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question: Why Ubuntu has Python 2.7.3 since
more than 2 days (even
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:04:33 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:50, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question:
20 matches
Mail list logo
