Re: Upload of python-mock 1.0.1 to Debian unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-05-07 22:32, Simon Chopin wrote: > I'd like to know if/when you plan to upload python-mock 1.0.1 in > unstable (it sits at the moment in experimental). I'm preparing it right now in SVN. @Stefanor: Could you sponsor me again? Cheers, - -- Michael Fladischer Fladi.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRiearAAoJEGlMre9Rx7W2tYoQAI34OOw+3omI2hNOTOOsbCM0 c8eMwnbbtO2dufAMouTXA9vfWNzZDECf9TolJSdgwcutXPSe1D2JGLJSUnqEXo1+ pP3inguW2T4o3bK3789pTIsYH/J5lgSno4/vWgIR1xD1nfPzb5G+LxESROnB8HpN KroR8i4nIhiAOKgBJx4KW5kUlITu4D+h9ekj3oIGV1E9uTUpAnDdv4CEjs0KTOmw brKsVH8lGUW+ln5BSI5v4CHl5Y+GoroDXWIKe9xM+WpQxqFpEnis1kZm5kr4zGaJ 1Y09OyJbSCwqHdGC5kG0t76ToZ6egCy2PsZT4QsmdIwrnpoKNZBrkCH1vBAN+Wwi k6OctFpT9XWMg00bm+kVHZ8lZ1bJHKHBl25fGmY1UWDC8LLeg+To9jbBsQDug6AN IgZphSX+KN3A3Rh96eottR9WOGVQ21nU68i2Syf/DTqhZvqeLVY4oah2SwWeoIh5 jMAPQqYrLWHCoamE8Xnrz2V5EEyuiQDKJz6B4NT2KNqu4fIggzar+a+5Z9twL8Nj SaVchpjwpj3JNSeXNQUwcPKNEQQVi5FGXG6hoVA4AgCjC8wtJp9ZPrbT4qIrDLXw nWFpQCywWhiJMf05MyiUv7qWJEPcSVimseB6AfwIioOe4NOXFf6KyQeWVdvyVznM xFGkQt4zGf29DhPpqaa3 =aRFw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5189e6ab.6020...@fladi.at
Re: python3.3 status
* Jakub Wilk , 2013-05-07, 14:01: Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: I should have said that I initially tested only packages build-depending on python3-all(-dev). There are also these, that build-depended only on the default version: pyinotify #692385 python-pip #692384 (and presumably more...) boost1.49 FTBFS TODO boost1.50 FTBFS TODO Cloned #691378 into #707114 and #707114 dbus-python FTBFS due to a bug in python3.3 #707084 Filed #707139. distribute FTBFS TODO #707140 (not related to Python 3.3) libguestfs FTBFS TODO 707141 nuitka FTBFS TODO No bug yet; doesn't look related to Python 3.3. py3cairo FTBFS TODO #707145 pykde4 FTBFS TODO #707148 pymarkups FTBFS TODO This one needs fixed docutils. pyside FTBFS TODO #707150 pytest FTBFS TODO #707151 python-cffi FTBFS TODO #707164 python-csb FTBFS TODO No bug yet; doesn't look related to Python 3.3. python-numpy FTBFS TODO #707156 python-qt4 FTBFS TODO #707157 python-stem FTBFS TODO #707160 shiboken FTBFS TODO #707161 yapsy FTBFS TODO #707162 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130507204947.ga5...@jwilk.net
Upload of python-mock 1.0.1 to Debian unstable
Hi, I'd like to know if/when you plan to upload python-mock 1.0.1 in unstable (it sits at the moment in experimental). One of my packages, pytest, currently FTBFS in unstable due to the recent Python 3.3 changes and the new upstream version build-depends on python-mock >= 1.0.1, so I guess you'd understand my desire to get this fixed quickly. Cc-ed Sebastian as he was my last sponsor for pytest Cheers, Simon signature.asc Description: signature
Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)
On 7 May 2013 18:46, Sandro Tosi wrote: > debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare > thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just > a bunch of puppets waiting for orders by the ultimate master - well > done. > Selectively quoting the tech committee resolution: "These breakdowns appear to be rooted in an unfortunate feedback loop, of which all parties involved share some blame. On multiple occasions, inflammatory comments regarding the employment and/or motives of individuals involved in python have been made. ... The committee expresses its disappointment in the communication problems which have lead to this issue, and strongly suggests that all involved parties be as awesome to each other as possible." Please everyone, make an effort to be polite. I don't know the origin of all the problems in debian-python (and frankly I don't want to), but it's pretty clear that writing snarky messages isn't going to resolve them. If you want to make a point, do so politely and people will be more inclined to listen. Thanks, Thomas
RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub
(or RFR, for Jakub :P) Hello, I'm looking for sponsors for all the packages above, all dependencies of fedmsg in a way or another. bunch, kitchen and grapefruit (I think) have all been already reviewed by Jakub Wilk, all the remarks being adressed TTBMK. From the ITPs: bunch: Dot-accessible Python dictionary (a la JavaScript objects) kitchen: Cornucopia of useful Python code grapefruit: Python module to manipulate color information easily fabulous: Makes your terminal output totally fabulous stomper: Python client implementation of the STOMP protocol txws: Twisted WebSockets wrapper txzmq: ZeroMQ bindings for Twisted moksha.common: Common components for Moksha moksha.hub: Hub components for Moksha Moksha is a combination of Web framework and messaging hub that is written on top of widely-used and tested components such as Twisted, 0mq or TurboGears. All packages are available in the DPMT repository. For those wondering, I'm left with m2ext, python-fedora and fedmsg itself to package, and I might actually drop python-fedora from the list :-) Cheers, Simon signature.asc Description: signature
Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/05/msg5.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/05/msg00020.html debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just a bunch of puppets waiting for orders by the ultimate master - well done. > I would suggest > moving on to more constructive topics. sure let's ignore the problem, it's so much easier, isn't it? that's how the whole story was handled, so I can see your point here. well done, again. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxxrgsaoyzbyzixyf2mkq+31bhrb4bicesxcmjzfdr2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: python3.3 status
Thanks Jakub, FWIW: > cython produces broken code #681697 update WiP (for some reason did not build using python-dbg at all thus dh_install failed... will troubleshoot shortly) > nuitka FTBFS TODO I believe fixed upstream -- if not -- will be, i.e. nothing to worry for the team -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130507124212.ge9...@onerussian.com
python3.3 status
python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: boost1.49 FTBFS TODO boost1.50 FTBFS TODO cairosvg FTBFS, needs fixed py3cairo cracklib2 FTBFS #681749 cssutils FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetests, then FTBFS #686340 cython produces broken code #681697 dbus-python FTBFS due to a bug in python3.3 #707084 distribute FTBFS TODO flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086 germinate FTBFS, needs fixed python-apt hivex FTBFS #692387 libguestfs FTBFS TODO mdp FTBFS, needs fixed python-numpy mod-wsgi, FTBFS #692390 mpi4py needs fixed cython nuitka FTBFS TODO objgraph FTBFS #686331 py3cairo FTBFS TODO pyepr needs fixed cython pyfits FTBFS, needs fixed python-numpy pykde4 FTBFS TODO pymarkups FTBFS TODO pyopencl FTBFS, needs fixed boost1.49 pyside FTBFS TODO pystemmer needs fixed cython pytest FTBFS TODO python-apt FTBFS #681744 python-astropy needs fixed cython python-cffi FTBFS TODO python-csb FTBFS TODO python-distutils-extra FTBFS needs rebuilt pygobject python-docutils FTBFS #681723 python-flexmock FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetests python-llfuse needs fixed cython python-notify2 FTBFS, needs fixed dbus-python python-numpy FTBFS TODO python-qt4 FTBFS TODO python-scipy needs fixed cython, then likely FTBFS #691254 python-stem FTBFS TODO python-wadllib FTBFS #686332 pyyaml needs fixed cython pyzmq needs fixed cython shiboken FTBFS TODO urwid FTBFS #692383 yafaray FTBFS #692381 yapsy FTBFS TODO yp-svipc FTBFS, needs fixed python-numpy "FTBFS TODO" means that a package fails to build, but there's no bug filed yet. I plan to file bugs today or tomorrow, unless there are other volunteers to do it. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130507120126.ga6...@jwilk.net