On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
>Cool. Thanks everyone for your help. I'm going to ask upstream if
>they'll consider moving to oauthlib then instead of python-oauth2.
Thanks for that. I've ported a number of libraries and apps to oauthlib, and
had a chance to speak with th
Hi Piotr,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:53:50PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> good that you ask, I will use this opportunity to dispel a myth:
> dh_python* tools (or any other dh_* tool which doesn't have "install" in
> its name AFAIK) do not install files.
>
> dh_python* is not supposed to ins
[Olivier Berger, 2014-02-09]
> Piotr Ożarowski writes:
>
> > [Andreas Tille, 2014-02-07]
> >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:41:10PM +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
> >> > I assume this is a python application and not a library?
> >>
> >> It is an application including some private modules which I like
On 10/02/14 05:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 02:41 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> [...]
>
> python-oauth2 is indeed not maintained anymore upstream, and has
> security problems. As a consequence, I worked out a patch for keystone
> so that it uses oauthlib instead. I would recommend th
Hi.
I'm looking for advice on how to package the Online Python Tutor's
backend server which can execute arbitrary Python scripts submitted by
the user.
The CGI's code is supposed to be safeguarding against abuse, but I think
some sandboxing would be better at the CGI invocation for additional
sec
5 matches
Mail list logo
