Hi,
I'd like to simple package python-eta module[0].
Having a look at policy, I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module
using a git repo ?
Thanks
Olivier
[0] https://github.com/mbreese/eta/
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam
On Aug 19, 2015, at 07:41 PM, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
As I am not a regular contributor to the python-modules (only made a few),
would you want to review the package once in git (when ready) before I upload
? Or should I go when ready ? after reading again Python Policy of course
;-)
On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 19, 2015, at 04:11 PM, olivier sallou wrote:
I'd like to simple package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy,
I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a git repo ?
We are very close to switching to git. I'm hoping
On 07/09/2015 12:25 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 3 July 2015 at 08:29, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
I think dropping these duplicates is the only thing that makes sense. For
reference, I dropped python3-ipaddr once python3.2 was gone (because 3.3 has
ipaddress, which does the
On 08/19/2015 06:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 19, 2015, at 04:11 PM, olivier sallou wrote:
I'd like to simple package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy,
I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a git repo ?
Hi,
I checked¹ logs from gcc rebuild² and it looks like almost 500 packages
are still missing dh-python build dependency even thought the warning is
there since a while.
(and I'd really love to remove old dh_python2 from python package)
Does someone want to prepare a patch for lintian to detect
6 matches
Mail list logo
