Re: Application libraries private, Distutils metadata available for console scripts and introspection

[Ben Finney, 2015-11-26] > * Patch upstream's ‘setup.py’ to rename the command file to something > like ‘execute-lorem’, so that it can be installed alongside the > ‘lorem’ package directory. instead of patching I usually let it install into /usr/bin and mv it to /usr/share/foo/ under a differ

Re: Application libraries private, Distutils metadata available for console scripts and introspection

Piotr Ożarowski writes: > As I already suggested in my previous mail, installing scripts into > private directory and symlinking them in /usr/bin is the cleanest > solution IMHO Thank you. I have come to a compromise solution on this which builds on that suggestion. Ben Finney writes: > * Th

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

[Vincent Cheng, 2015-11-26] > > that's why I don't believe you built it in jessie. python-sphinx is not > > backported > > and you didn't mention any patches > > > > solutions: > > 1) backport python-sphinx, or > > 2) use patch from Ubuntu: > > https://patches.ubuntu.com/r/routes/routes_2.2-1ubun

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

[Vincent Cheng, 2015-11-26] > >> solution: pass -sa to dpkg-source ("--force-orig-source" in sbuild or > >> "--debbuildopts -sa" in pbuilder) > > No, that's not necessary as long as the orig tarball is already > present in the archive in another suite (which would be true for > backports, since t

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

Hi Piotr, On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> I've uploaded all what I prepared to this URL: >> http://sid.gplhost.com/bpo/ > > THANK YOU! > [build log snipped] > that's why I don't believe you built it in jessie. python-sphinx is not > backported > and you didn't mention

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

Hi Piotr, On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-11-26] >> that's the first mistake most backporters do, they forgot to include orig >> tarball >> (ftp masters would detect that and reject your package, additional work for >> them) >> >> solution: pass

Re: How to manually install python scripts and needed modules (Was: How to tweak homebrew install target for Gubbins)

[Andreas Tille, 2015-11-26] > since nobody seems to have any experience with brew in my last > commit to the gubbins packaging git[1] I tried to install the > included python files manually. Unfortunately for the python > module I installed to > >/usr/share/pyshared/gubbins pyshared is an im

How to manually install python scripts and needed modules (Was: How to tweak homebrew install target for Gubbins)

Hi, since nobody seems to have any experience with brew in my last commit to the gubbins packaging git[1] I tried to install the included python files manually. Unfortunately for the python module I installed to /usr/share/pyshared/gubbins the processing to /usr/lib/python3.4/gubbins does no

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

[Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-11-26] > that's the first mistake most backporters do, they forgot to include orig > tarball > (ftp masters would detect that and reject your package, additional work for > them) > > solution: pass -sa to dpkg-source ("--force-orig-source" in sbuild or > "--debbuildopts -

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

ost Architecture: amd64 | Install-Time: 0 | Job: /tmp/build/routes_2.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc | Machine Architecture: amd64 | Package: routes | Package-Time: 0 | Source-Version: 2.2-1~bpo8+1 | Space: 0 | Status: failed | Version: 2.2-1~bpo8+1 | ───

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

On 11/25/2015 12:07 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >>> debdiff of what you want to upload + time for me to check it (a week, I >>> will respond most probably in 24h, though) >> >> I'll have to repeat myself then: there's no change but an entry in > > I will not repeat myself. I already wrote why I thi

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

On 11/26/2015 09:32 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > I hope he > will realize one package will FTBFS in jessie Instead of playing such a game, would you mind telling which package you're talking about? Or is it more fun that you just keep the issue for yourself, and then use it as a mockery, just to

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

> Note that regarding bug reports, the backports website states: > > "Please report bugs that you found in the packages to the backports > mailinglist and *NOT* to the > Debian BTS!" so why do I get them? DAK sends emails to me too and it doesn't mentio

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 at 10:32 Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > This is not the policy for backports. Amend the policy if you > > disagree. It's not fair to kick Zigo because he didn't follow the rules > > and consider oneself above them when he respects them. > > fix it yourself, I'm getting all the bug

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

[IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU), 2015-11-26] > i think the kick in question is not your disapproval of the current > affair, but referring to past action <560c3acd.9000...@debian.org>. then I'm glad I did that. There's a change already (we had a mail! a mail BEFORE an upload!). I'm still not happ

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

On 2015-11-26 09:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > PS I didn't "kick" him, i think the kick in question is not your disapproval of the current affair, but referring to past action <560c3acd.9000...@debian.org>. fgmasdr IOhannes

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

> This is not the policy for backports. Amend the policy if you > disagree. It's not fair to kick Zigo because he didn't follow the rules > and consider oneself above them when he respects them. fix it yourself, I'm getting all the bugs and emails so there's nothing that suggest I should use backp

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

❦ 25 novembre 2015 00:00 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski  : >> > PS I'm getting all the emails from backports even if I wasn't the one >> > who uploaded so this is official after all. >> >> This isn't new, and it's been discussed at large. Basically, we would >> all like the BTS to have the feature to se