❦ 2 avril 2017 09:45 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant :
>>> it's just a few lines down in the changelog:
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829744 (it is kinda
>>> sad that there was no discussion with the python team from the lintian
>>> maintainer before accepting and merging it, e
❦ 2 avril 2017 10:21 +0100, Chris Lamb :
>> > On the current subject, I also agree we should not drop prematurely
>> > packages targeted to Python 2.
>
> The Lintian tag in question does not suggest maintainers should be
> removing existing Python 2 support from packages.
>
> It merely suggests
Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > On the current subject, I also agree we should not drop prematurely
> > packages targeted to Python 2.
The Lintian tag in question does not suggest maintainers should be
removing existing Python 2 support from packages.
It merely suggests that you should think twice
On 02/04/17 08:39, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 1 avril 2017 19:42 -0400, Sandro Tosi :
It's not at all clear where [1] came from. The lintian changelog [3] does not
give a bug reference and I couldn't find a bug.
it's just a few lines down in the changelog:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
❦ 1 avril 2017 19:42 -0400, Sandro Tosi :
>> It's not at all clear where [1] came from. The lintian changelog [3] does
>> not
>> give a bug reference and I couldn't find a bug.
>
> it's just a few lines down in the changelog:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829744 (it is k
5 matches
Mail list logo