Re: Launchpad: Merge of Accounts Requested

2024-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 18, 2024 9:19:21 AM UTC, Dominik George wrote: >Hi, > >>FYI: This message got delivered at the public mailing list >>debian-python@lists.debian.org. To me it looks like someone if trying to find >>a loophole in launchpad and plans to abuse the system. > >Thanks for reaching out to

Re: Launchpad: Merge of Accounts Requested

2024-03-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 17, 2024 8:49:02 PM UTC, Gregor Riepl wrote: >> Someone has asked us to merge one of your Launchpad >> accounts with another. >> >> If you go ahead, this will merge the account called >> 'Debian Python Modules Team (debian-python)' into the account >> 'johnfrandes12'. >> >> To

Re: Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 11:11:21 PM UTC, Bo YU wrote: >Hi! > >On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 1:18 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> On Friday, March 15, 2024 10:55:34 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: >> > Hi Scott (2024.03.15_13:31:40_+) >> > >> > > I origi

Re: Maintenance of python-tomlkit

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
gt; ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ eam...@debian.org > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 > ⠈⠳⣄ > > >On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:50 PM Scott Kitterman >wrote: > >> This is another one I don't use anymore where I'm the sole uploader. >> >> It's got a fair number of rdepends, most notably poetry. Any takers >> before I >> orphan it? >> >> Scott K

Maintenance of python-tomlkit

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is another one I don't use anymore where I'm the sole uploader. It's got a fair number of rdepends, most notably poetry. Any takers before I orphan it? Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 15, 2024 10:55:34 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Scott (2024.03.15_13:31:40_+) > > > I originally packaged python-resolvelib for pip and python-commentjson so > > we could run python-resolvelib's tests. Pip is no longer using the > > packaged version. It's currently used

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 3:47:25 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 3/15/24 13:52, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On March 15, 2024 7:19:16 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 3/14/24 08:52, Andreas Tille wrote: >>>> I would have prefered to >>

Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
I originally packaged python-resolvelib for pip and python-commentjson so we could run python-resolvelib's tests. Pip is no longer using the packaged version. It's currently used by pdm and ansible-core. I am the sole uploader for both these packages and intend to orphan them, but if someone

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 7:19:16 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 3/13/24 18:34, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 >> >> Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for Uploaders/ >> Maintainer in the t

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 1:34:14 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 > > Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for > Uploaders/ Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this > package.

Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for Uploaders/ Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this package. It really needs updated to the new upstream release (blocking both aioquic and dnspythong

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-03-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 3, 2024 6:12:09 AM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Christian, > >Am Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 11:48:57PM +0100 schrieb Christian Kastner: >> On 2024-03-02 23:11, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > I'm curious why you believe I didn't care. I likely would have reverted >> > my change if I didn't have

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 2, 2024 8:29:47 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Jeroen, > >Am Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:48:33PM +0100 schrieb Jeroen Ploemen: >> ... > >Julian had sensibly commented on this and had added interesting >questions I'm keen on hearing your answers. > >> As for the inclusion of codes of

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
iotr Ożarowski |23 > Sandro Tosi |82 > Scott Kitterman | 7 > Vincent Bernat |15 > (6 rows) > > Debian PaN is another team which might need extra discussion but

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 28, 2024 9:54:55 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 2/28/24 00:54, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out >> that you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve that all by yourself >> by follow

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 28, 2024 7:08:14 AM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Scott, > >Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54:01PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out >> that you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 27, 2024 11:42:33 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result >> though and I think that's a bad idea. > >If a package isn't in the team, any DD can as

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 27, 2024 2:27:35 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of >>> the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science

Re: Packages Up For Grabs

2024-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 5:22:38 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, September 23, 2023 3:26:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer > > intend to maintain. Please let me know if you are intere

Bug#1063348: O: pdfkit

2024-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:pdfkit I am no longer interested in this package and no else in the Debian Python Team expressed interest it taking it over, so orphaning. The package itself is in reasonable shape. Upstream

Bug#1063317: O: django-anymail

2024-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-anymail I'm no longer interested in the package and no one from the Debian Python Team expressed interest in it, so orphaning. I've updated the package to the current upstream and updated

Bug#1063171: O: python-sparkpost

2024-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:python-sparkpost I'm no longer interested in the package (it was only packaged to support django-anymail, which is also about to be orphaned). This is an interface to a proprietary mail service.

Bug#1063033: O: django-wkhtmltopdf

2024-02-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-wkhtmltopdf I no longer use this package and no one in the Debian Python Team expressed any interest in it, so orphaning. At this time, the package is in reasonably good shape and does not

Bug#1061447: O: django-maintenancemode

2024-01-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-maintenancemode Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package).

Bug#1060463: O: django-impersonate -- Django module for superusers to impersonate accounts

2024-01-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-impersonate Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package).

Bug#1060406: O: django-organizations -- Django groups and multi-user account management module

2024-01-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-organizations Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package).

Re: Packages Up For Grabs

2024-01-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 3:26:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer intend > to maintain. Please let me know if you are interesting in taking over the > package. If no one steps up, if a package has rdepends I'

Packages Up For Grabs

2023-09-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer intend to maintain. Please let me know if you are interesting in taking over the package. If no one steps up, if a package has rdepends I'll orphan it (since a human uploader is required) and if it doesn't, i'll ask to have

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 17, 2023 9:48:38 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >Scott & everyone, > >On 9/16/23 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It's pretty relevant to your question. If you had instead updated the >> existing packages from the new upstream, no transition would be ne

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 16, 2023 4:48:46 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 9/15/23 14:03, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Why did you hijack this from the Python team instead of just working with the >> existing maintainers to update the existing packages from the new upstream >> loc

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, September 15, 2023 3:38:05 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > As you may know, the upstream author for pysnmp passed away last year. > As a result, the whole suite was forked by "lextudio". I packaged it, > and the result is this list of source packages: > > python-pyasn1-lextudio

Re: DebConf 23: Python BoF

2023-09-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 1:23:12 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > We have scheduled a Python BoF at DebConf23: > https://debconf23.debconf.org/talks/27-python-bof/ > It will be on Sep 16 (Sat): at 10:30 local time (05:00 - 05:45 UTC) > > I started getting together an agenda in: >

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, August 18, 2023 9:33:48 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:15:18PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > On August 18, 2023 1:04:26 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: > > >> In Debian terms, it's not the preferred for

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 18, 2023 1:04:26 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Scott, > >Am Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 02:18:35PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> >They are zip files containing python source code. It is possible to include >> >compiled C extensions in wheels, but I check

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 15, 2023 1:51:54 PM UTC, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: >On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:08:11 +0200, >Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 3:53:07 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: >> > Hi Scott, >> > >> > Am Mon, Aug 14, 202

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 3:53:07 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:06:42PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > >Before I upload I'd like to ask for reviewing this patch and opinions > > >about the test suite errors. While these

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 14, 2023 12:28:30 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending > >Hi, > >I've fixed the issue reported in this bug[1]. > >In addition I've took the chance to upload pdm to its latest upstream >version. When doing so I realised that build time tests are basically >ignored.

Re: Naming of python binary packages

2023-08-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, August 11, 2023 10:49:00 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > My vote would be strongly towards maintaining the status quo of the > policy-defined names. > > I don't see any strong argument for changing this. Fully agreed. In addition to the reasons you listed, renaming a lot of packages

Bug#1043255: RM: pep517 -- ROM; Obsolete, replaced by python-pyproject-hooks

2023-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Python-pyproject-hooks has replaced pep517, so it should be removed once there are no more reverse Build-Depends. Most packages have been updated and bugs have been filed for the three remaining. Scott K

Re: Maintenance of gtts (python3-gtts)

2023-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
, 2023 9:27:05 AM EDT Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hello Scott, > > I don't use it, but seems an interested project. I can work on it, but > it would be great if you have a maintainer that already know the project. > > Cheers, > Emmanuel > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:23:

Maintenance of gtts (python3-gtts)

2023-08-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
The gtts package is, at least nominally, maintained by the Debian Python Team, but has no human uploader. As a practical matter, I think someone should either adopt it (add themselves to uploaders) or we should formally orphan the package so we aren't pretending. It has two rdepends:

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 2, 2023 1:23:15 PM UTC, "Éric Araujo" wrote: >Le 02/08/2023 à 00:09, Scott Kitterman a écrit : >> * pdm (update to new version, needs pyproject-hooks) >>[pdm-pep517 can probably go away too] > >pdm-pep517 was renamed to pdm-backend, which will still

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 2, 2023 1:34:32 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 7:36:38 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 7:36:38 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: > >>> > >>> https://githu

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 6:22:26 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: > > > > https://github.com/pypa/pyproject-hooks > > > > It looks like we need this to

Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: https://github.com/pypa/pyproject-hooks It looks like we need this to update python-build to the latest version (which we should definitely do sooner rather than later). Is anyone up for packaging this? Once it's in the archive we

Bug#1040556: ITP: aioquic -- Library for the QUIC network protocol in Python

2023-07-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: aioquic Version : 0.9.21 Upstream Author : Jeremy Lainé * URL : https://github.com/aiortc/aioquic * License

Bug#1040553: ITP: pylsqpack -- Python wrapper around the ls-qpack library

2023-07-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: pylsqpack Version : 0.3.17 Upstream Author : Jeremy Lainé * URL : https://github.com/aiortc/pylsqpack * License

Moving from appdirs to platformdirs

2023-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
It would be nice if we could reduce/eliminate use of appdirs during the Trixie development cycle. It's unmaintained and superseded by platformdirs. As far as I can tell, platformdirs is API compatible with appdirs, except the import path is different. As a result, switching does need some

Future of django-redis-sessions and django-simple-redis-admin

2023-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
I recently removed myself from the django-reids package uploaders because I no longer have an interest in it. It's still actively maintained by Michael Fladischer (thanks). There are also django-redis-sessions and django-simple-redis-admin. I packaged these for reasons that are no longer

Re: Python pybuild system & setup.cfg

2023-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 5:07:56 PM EDT Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Hilmar, > > Preuße, Hilmar, on 2023-03-23: > > I'm a little bit lost, by building the pssh package. The upstream author > > released a new version, which changed the build system. Before I had a > > setup.py in the root

Re: Joining the team! Again with policy acceptance.

2023-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, March 5, 2023 12:51:59 PM EST Scarlett Moore wrote: > Hi! > My name is Scarlett Moore, I have been working on https://salsa.debian.org/ > mycroftai-team which consists of many python packages relating to voice AI. > Mycroft is no more, but forked. I would like to move these packages to

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 5, 2023 5:22:33 PM UTC, Julian Gilbey wrote: >On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+) >> >> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in >> > bookworm? >> >> Because we aim to have a single

Re: Bug#791635 python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2023-01-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
Do we really have to have this argument again? Let's not. Please wontfix and let's move on. Personally, I maintain 25 packages in the team that would need renaming. I'm not sure how many total there are, but they'd all have to go through New again. It'd be much simpler just to drop DPT or

Re: Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

2023-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 17, 2023 11:01:45 PM UTC, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 09:20 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >> > Hello. >> > After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- >> > psycopg" >> > (I

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 7:51:47 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Scott (2023.01.14_19:34:59_+) >> >dh_python3 would have been able to generate >> >python3-tomli | python3-min-version (>= 3.11) >> > >> >instead of >> >python3-tomli | python3 (>> 3.11) >> > >> >Then, once python3.10 was dropped

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 7:12:33 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Scott (2023.01.14_17:22:42_+) >> Take the example in #1027947. If this proposal had been in place >> already, what would he have been the generated dependency and how >> would it have worked? > >dh_python3 would have been able

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 5:08:17 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >I have proposed a policy change that would permit dh_python3 to generate >dependencies that apply to all currently-supported Python 3 versions: > >https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python3-defaults/-/merge_requests/13 > >Please

Re: python-avro: FTBFS: AssertionError: 'reader type: null not compatible with writer type: int' not found in {'reader type: SchemaType.NULL not compatible with writer type: SchemaType.INT'}

2022-12-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 4:13:20 PM EST Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I wonder whether someone might suggest a fix for > > > == > FAIL: test_schema_compatibility_type_mismatch >

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 19, 2022 6:27:55 AM UTC, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: >Dear Scott, > >thanks for the reply. > >Am 19.12.2022 06:25 schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> Pybuild using the pyproject plugin will build a wheel and >> then install the necessary files in the package us

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 19, 2022 5:13:27 AM UTC, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: >Am 18.12.2022 23:03 schrieb Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: >> AFAIK Debian helper for Python handles this > >;) Yes, but how? > >Does it ignore the pip-default-entry-point-scripts? Does it create its own >script? >Do you have to

Re: python-tesserocr: flaky autopkgtest

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 18, 2022 4:47:39 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Sun, 18 Dec 2022, Malik Mlitat wrote: > >> >> Hello DPT, >> >> I have updated the package python-tesserocr [1] to skip the flaky test to >> fix the issue below. >> >>  I need a maintainer please to upload the new release version

Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages

2022-12-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
e, I don't feel having "python-supysonic" would be a >> good naming scheme... > >please note that would be just for source packages, the user-facing >ones can still be `supysonic` as that's what you expect to install > >On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 8:53 PM Scott Kitterman

Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages

2022-12-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 12, 2022 1:24:35 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Proposal: the DPT will start adding a `python-` prefix to NEW source >packages names, unless the upstream project already contains it > >AFAICT all other major languages ecosystems packaging teams use a >(semi?)mandatory tag to identify

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

2022-12-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 4, 2022 3:42:15 PM UTC, Ole Streicher wrote: >Hi Scott, > >thanks for the hint. > >Scott Kitterman writes: >> My first guess is that in some circumstances setuptools is doing the >> installing >> and in others it's the dh-python pyproject plugi

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

2022-12-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 11:19:06 AM EST Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > I need some help with a package that switched to using pyproject.toml > only. The package is asdf-astropy, and the problem I have that it does > not package all Python files recursively: for example astropy_asdf.io >

Re: Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too

2022-11-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:38:30 PM EST Stuart Prescott wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On 01/12/2022 02:16, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Package: lintian > > Version: 2.115.3 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org > > >

Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too

2022-11-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep,

Re: How to deal with cross-dependant packages

2022-11-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 28, 2022 4:51:23 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to update python-thinc for the Debian Science team. The new >version needs srsly which needs catalogue[1] which in turn needs >srsly[2]. Do you see any means to solve this cross-dependency? > >Kind regards >

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

2022-11-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 21, 2022 12:25:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: > >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: > >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

2022-11-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should >> proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default >> Python version!! > >This is a

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 5:26:35 AM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On November 2, 2022 8:35:35 AM UTC, Gordon Ball wrote: > >On 19/10/2022 22:30, Gordon Ball wrote: > >> On 09/10/2022 21:39, Gordon Ball wrote: > >>> On 07/10/2022 01:13, Timo R

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 2, 2022 8:35:35 AM UTC, Gordon Ball wrote: >On 19/10/2022 22:30, Gordon Ball wrote: >> On 09/10/2022 21:39, Gordon Ball wrote: >>> On 07/10/2022 01:13, Timo Röhling wrote: Hi Gordon, * Gordon Ball [2022-10-07 00:10]: > * Upload to unstable and see what breaks?

Bug#1023299: ganeti-testsuite: yaml.load in testsuite needs to specify loader

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: ganeti-testsuite Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Previously yaml.load did not require a loader to be specified: load(stream, Loader=None) Now it does (starting in pyyaml 6.0):

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:31:47 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > I dont think it should do that, so we need to investigate. Where > > can I find the updated packaging? > > I did not push the change right now, I will push once I solve this issue :). > > my opinion is that I should

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:02:00 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > >It looks to me like the current pyproject.toml file for pyfai is not > >sufficient> > > to build the package, so I would tempted to keep what you have now. > > Due to the presence of this file, pybuild try to build

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:48:12 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > > As far as I can see, the package doesnt ship any files in > > > /usr/bin. > > > Why do you need to build man

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > As far as I can see, the package doesnt ship any files in /usr/bin. > > Why do you need to build man pages (Im assuming thats what > > thats for? More generically, what problem did that step in the > > process solve

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 11:15:59 AM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > thanks for your help. > > I have one more question > > I have this command from the previous build > > {interpreter} setup.py build_man > > how can I translate this with the new build systeme ? As far as I can see,

Bug#1023211: RM: dirtbike -- ROM; Obsolete, no longer used for any Debian Python packages

2022-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org We used to use this back when we debundled pip's embedded dependencies. We don't do that anymore (no longer supported upstream), so dirtbike is not needed. It is unmaintained upstream and likely to be a problem

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, October 31, 2022 1:26:03 PM EDT Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Frederic, > > Am 31.10.22 um 08:57 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: > >> I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by > >> adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let > >>

Re: wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On October 29, 2022 10:07:13 PM UTC, picca wrote: >Hello, I try to fix an FTBFS in the python-xrayutilities package. >When I try to build it, I get this error message., I do not understand why I >need to add a build dependency to python3-wheel.Is it something missing in the >dependency of

Bug#1021964: ITP: python-noseofyeti -- Module to create Python codec for tests using RSpec inspired DSL

2022-10-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-noseofyeti Version : 2.3.1 Upstream Author : Stephen Moore * URL : https://github.com/delfick/nose-of-yeti

Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF)

2022-07-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 26, 2022 2:50:19 PM UTC, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: >> > == pybuild improvements == >> > >> > getting the autopkgtest MR in would be great >> > >>

Re: Help for python-subby needed

2022-02-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:01:22 AM EST Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 01:50:22AM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:48:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I need python-subby as a new dependency for some Debian Med package. > >

Re: Reaching team consensus on usage of py3versions -r and X-Python3-Version in Lintian

2022-01-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:17:31 AM EST Neil Williams wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:47:44 -0500 > > Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > I'm following up on bug #1001677 [1] on the DPT's list to try to reach > > consensus, as I think the Lintian tags that were created to

Re: Cleaning up the Salsa DPT landing page

2022-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 17, 2022 12:59:53 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-01-17 12 h 31, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Monday, January 17, 2022 12:20:59 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> The merger between the DPMT a

Re: Cleaning up the Salsa DPT landing page

2022-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 17, 2022 12:59:53 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-01-17 12 h 31, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Monday, January 17, 2022 12:20:59 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> The merger between the DPMT a

Re: Cleaning up the Salsa DPT landing page

2022-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 17, 2022 12:20:59 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Hey folks, > > The merger between the DPMT and the PAPT into a single entity has been > pretty successful IMO and I think it's time to cleanup the Salsa DPT > landing page. > > Looking at

New python-nacl

2022-01-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've just uploaded the new (version 1.5.0) python-nacl to experimental to give rdepends a chance to test. Being a python extension there's not a formal transition for this, but I wanted to do some testing first, so I thought I'd put it in experimental so others can too. Scott K signature.asc

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2022-01-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 3, 2022 3:13:23 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-01-03 01 h 30, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Since this is all about team Git repositories, someone should just fix > > them (modulo the one about using pypi, which I think we mostly agree &

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2022-01-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 7:50:02 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2021-12-12 01 h 23, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >> I think there's still one point we need to figure out: how to make > >> these remarks known to the packages maintainers, instead of all of > >> them just being in a text

Re: New pybuild plugin for PEP-517 pyproject.toml projects

2021-12-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 29, 2021 11:33:26 PM UTC, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >Hi Stefano, > >On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:17:57PM +, stefa...@debian.org wrote: >> Hi debian-python (2021.12.17_23:52:14_+) >> > - Build-depend on `dh-python-pep517` as well as any build tools >> > specified by

Re: Packaging request for pygrib

2021-12-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
Not a fool, just learning. Debian is complicated and the best way to learn is to dive in and try things. As long as you learn along the way, it's all good. Scott K On December 28, 2021 11:46:49 PM UTC, Kyle Lawlor-Bagcal wrote: >Oh, I see. That is indeed the same package. I don't think

Re: Packaging request for pygrib

2021-12-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 28, 2021 11:34:01 PM UTC, Kyle Lawlor-Bagcal wrote: >On 12/28/21 6:18 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> For The Debian Python team, if the team is listed as the maintainer for an >> existing package, then you can go ahead. If an individual is listed at >> Ma

Re: Packaging request for pygrib

2021-12-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, December 28, 2021 6:14:20 PM EST Kyle Lawlor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:59 PM, Geert Stappers > wrote: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging > > > Geert Stappers > Could not resist to ignore the "tell me how to do it", settled for a short > reply. Thank you for the link, I

Use of flit as a build-backend in pybuild

2021-11-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
The versions of pybuild in stable, testing, and unstable all support flit as a build-backend for packages built upstream using flit. You can tell if your package is built using flit if it has a pyproject.toml file and it contains a paragraph like: [build-system] requires = ["flit_core

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2021-11-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 27, 2021 6:01:08 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Hello, >while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the >repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: > >* missing branches >* changes not pushed to salsa >* general misalignment in

Re: Downgrading dnspython back to 1.16.0 to fix Eventlet

2021-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:49:21 AM EST Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 2/2/21 7:46 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Both Eventlet and DNSPython are monkey patching the standard SSL library > > in potentially conflicting ways > > After checking, that's *NOT* the case. Though Eventlet is doing >

Re: How to watch pypi.org

2020-10-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 10:24:22 PM EDT Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:29 PM Fioddor Superconcentrado wrote: > > I've packaged a project provided via https://pipi.org and I wanted to > > create a debian/watch file but pipi.org publishes the tarball behind a > > strange url like > I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >